When it comes to the idea of the government forcing me to take a vaccination, and especially one where the so-called vaccine is actually an experimental mRNA [genetic] mutagen (not a vaccine at all) that reprograms (encodes) your body's cells, and where the vaccine failed miserably in its animal trials (killed all of the ferrets by Antibody-dependent enhancement), and then was rushed to market at "warp speed," skipping the animal trials altogether, and where the Big Pharma manufactures, unlike manufacturers for any other product, are exempted (indemnified) by law from any liability for any damages that it may cause to the people who it's given to, I not only reject that idea based upon pure logic, I reject that idea based upon principle as well.
Essentially, it all boils down to this with me: either we own our bodies, or the government owns them. There can be no in-between on this. If the government doesn't own our bodies, then it has absolutely no authority to tell us what we shall or shall not put into them. After all, the right of control is a right of ownership. Is it not?
Are we simply chattel slaves whose bodies are owned and controlled by politicians and bureaucrats who call themselves a government? If that's the case, then we have a much bigger issue to deal with as a society than the issue of forced vaccinations. Don't we?
Essentially, it all boils down to this with me: either we own our bodies, or the government owns them. There can be no in-between on this. If the government doesn't own our bodies, then it has absolutely no authority to tell us what we shall or shall not put into them. After all, the right of control is a right of ownership. Is it not?
Are we simply chattel slaves whose bodies are owned and controlled by politicians and bureaucrats who call themselves a government? If that's the case, then we have a much bigger issue to deal with as a society than the issue of forced vaccinations. Don't we?
Post
International Socialists ("Globalists") are always working hard to destroy the independence for which our Founding Fathers fought the American Revolution. After all, Thomas Jefferson did not write some declaration of diversity in 1776, but a Declaration of Independence for a new, unique and separate people. Globalists dream of a one world government, a New World Order, and doing away with America's borders, language, and culture. If they are successful, does that mean that Middle America--those of us who still cling to our bibles and our guns; the "bitter clingers" as Obama calls us, or the basket of "deplorables" who Hitlery Clinton describes as being "racist, sexist, xenophobic, and homophobic"--will we accept their new Technocratic paradigm? Do they really think that we will ever come to accept their New World Order without a fight? I don't think so.
Of course, we Americans celebrate Independence Day every year with a great deal of passion. However, we are not a truly Independent nation any longer. We don't even issue our own credit and currency from our own treasury any longer. Instead, corrupt U.S. politicians handed over that power in 1913 to a small group of foreign banking families who now issue [unbacked] credit to our nation at interest.
Meanwhile, we import 40% of the food we eat, and 90% of the clothes we wear. Therefore, we can't even feed or clothe ourselves, much less manufacture the consumer products that we Americans need everyday to live in the modern world. Wow! All that can now be said about a country that once was called the "Breadbasket of The World," and which at one time was the most productive manufacturer of high quality products that ever existed in human history.
"Independent," you say? We Americans don't even make our own laws anymore. Since 1992, when George H..W. Bush unconstitutionally signed America onto UN Agenda 21, and Obama signed us onto UN Agenda 2030 during his term, all American laws (even our local laws and zoning regulations) have been governed by foreign bureaucrats at the UN, not by Americans. Our country has essentially been taken over without a shot ever being fired by the same banking families who issue fraudulent credit to our nation--the same demons who used their ill-gotten fortunes to create the UN in the first place.
We must remember that American national sovereignty and independence is under threat like it's never been before. The implications of this threat are enormous. As long as the United States retains its independence and the U.S. Constitution is preserved, the American people will still possess the means to chart our own destiny. But if the United States is UN-democratically submerged into an "interdependent" New World Order, under the control of the United Nations, which is what is currently happening, all of that will be lost forever.
When I think about Communist-run organizations like the UN's World Health Organization (WHO) telling us Americans--a Free and Independent People (Right?), what to do about anything, as they have since March 13, 2020. I can't help but think about what the Father of Our Nation, George Washington, once said, which was "If we are to be told by a foreign Power what we shall do, and what we shall not do, we have Independence yet to seek, and have contended hitherto for very little." If he had known in 1776 that the nation he and our other ancestors were braving those blood soaked battles in order to form during our War for Independence would one day be taking it's marching orders from a bunch of foreign, unelected bureaucrats at the UN, he wouldn't have bothered doing so.
Thank God that a Bill has finally been introduced to Congress, which would restore our nation's independence, and withdraw America from the United Nations. The Bill is called the H.R. 193. The legislation would "terminate all membership by the United States in the United Nations, and in any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations." It would also end all U.S. involvement in all UN conventions and agreements, as well. Think about it. Why should Americans bankroll an unelected body of foreign agents who continuously work against America's national interests? Why should we bind our citizens to decisions made by communist dictatorships like China, when our Constitution is the Supreme Law of The Land?
"Countries are entitled to national sovereignty and independence. They want to run their own affairs." - John F. Kennedy
"My desire is to see us independent of all other countries, and under the influence of none." - George Washington
"The way to be respected abroad and happy at home is to remain free from foreign political connections." - George Washington
"Foreign influence upon our nation ought to be particularly alarming to the truly enlightened patriot." - George Washington
"Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government." - George Washington
"Every true friend to this country must see and feel that the policy of it is not to embroil ourselves with any nation whatever, but to avoid their disputes and their politics, and if they harass one another, to avail ourselves of the neutral conduct we have adopted." - George Washington
"My ardent desire is, and my aim has been to comply strictly with all our engagements foreign and domestic; but to keep the United States free from political connections with every other country. To see that the People may be independent of all, and under the influence of none. In a word, I want an American character, that the powers of the world may be convinced we act for ourselves and not for others; this, in my judgment, is the only way to be respected abroad and happy at home." - George Washington
"My desire is to see us independent of all other countries, and under the influence of none." - George Washington
"Not only the wealth, but the independence and security of a country, appear to be materially connected with the prosperity of manufactures. Every nation ought to endeavor to posses within itself all the essentials of a national supply. These comprise the means of subsistence, habitation, clothing and defense. " - Alexander Hamilton
Of course, we Americans celebrate Independence Day every year with a great deal of passion. However, we are not a truly Independent nation any longer. We don't even issue our own credit and currency from our own treasury any longer. Instead, corrupt U.S. politicians handed over that power in 1913 to a small group of foreign banking families who now issue [unbacked] credit to our nation at interest.
Meanwhile, we import 40% of the food we eat, and 90% of the clothes we wear. Therefore, we can't even feed or clothe ourselves, much less manufacture the consumer products that we Americans need everyday to live in the modern world. Wow! All that can now be said about a country that once was called the "Breadbasket of The World," and which at one time was the most productive manufacturer of high quality products that ever existed in human history.
"Independent," you say? We Americans don't even make our own laws anymore. Since 1992, when George H..W. Bush unconstitutionally signed America onto UN Agenda 21, and Obama signed us onto UN Agenda 2030 during his term, all American laws (even our local laws and zoning regulations) have been governed by foreign bureaucrats at the UN, not by Americans. Our country has essentially been taken over without a shot ever being fired by the same banking families who issue fraudulent credit to our nation--the same demons who used their ill-gotten fortunes to create the UN in the first place.
We must remember that American national sovereignty and independence is under threat like it's never been before. The implications of this threat are enormous. As long as the United States retains its independence and the U.S. Constitution is preserved, the American people will still possess the means to chart our own destiny. But if the United States is UN-democratically submerged into an "interdependent" New World Order, under the control of the United Nations, which is what is currently happening, all of that will be lost forever.
When I think about Communist-run organizations like the UN's World Health Organization (WHO) telling us Americans--a Free and Independent People (Right?), what to do about anything, as they have since March 13, 2020. I can't help but think about what the Father of Our Nation, George Washington, once said, which was "If we are to be told by a foreign Power what we shall do, and what we shall not do, we have Independence yet to seek, and have contended hitherto for very little." If he had known in 1776 that the nation he and our other ancestors were braving those blood soaked battles in order to form during our War for Independence would one day be taking it's marching orders from a bunch of foreign, unelected bureaucrats at the UN, he wouldn't have bothered doing so.
Thank God that a Bill has finally been introduced to Congress, which would restore our nation's independence, and withdraw America from the United Nations. The Bill is called the H.R. 193. The legislation would "terminate all membership by the United States in the United Nations, and in any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations." It would also end all U.S. involvement in all UN conventions and agreements, as well. Think about it. Why should Americans bankroll an unelected body of foreign agents who continuously work against America's national interests? Why should we bind our citizens to decisions made by communist dictatorships like China, when our Constitution is the Supreme Law of The Land?
"Countries are entitled to national sovereignty and independence. They want to run their own affairs." - John F. Kennedy
"My desire is to see us independent of all other countries, and under the influence of none." - George Washington
"The way to be respected abroad and happy at home is to remain free from foreign political connections." - George Washington
"Foreign influence upon our nation ought to be particularly alarming to the truly enlightened patriot." - George Washington
"Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government." - George Washington
"Every true friend to this country must see and feel that the policy of it is not to embroil ourselves with any nation whatever, but to avoid their disputes and their politics, and if they harass one another, to avail ourselves of the neutral conduct we have adopted." - George Washington
"My ardent desire is, and my aim has been to comply strictly with all our engagements foreign and domestic; but to keep the United States free from political connections with every other country. To see that the People may be independent of all, and under the influence of none. In a word, I want an American character, that the powers of the world may be convinced we act for ourselves and not for others; this, in my judgment, is the only way to be respected abroad and happy at home." - George Washington
"My desire is to see us independent of all other countries, and under the influence of none." - George Washington
"Not only the wealth, but the independence and security of a country, appear to be materially connected with the prosperity of manufactures. Every nation ought to endeavor to posses within itself all the essentials of a national supply. These comprise the means of subsistence, habitation, clothing and defense. " - Alexander Hamilton
The words "racism" and "racist" was coined in 1917 by the Communist revolutionary, Leon Trotsky [a Freemason who's original name was Lev Davidovich Bronstein], as a term to be used by him and his comrades to intimidate and silence anyone who was not marching in lock step with their Bolshevik takeover of Russia.
He also used this term in his book "History of the Russian Revolution" in order to give the impression that the Eastern Slavs (Ukrainians) were being selfish for wanting to preserve their unique cultural and ethnic identity in the face of the ethnic cleansing policies of the Communist revolutionaries.
In spite if the propaganda and the browbeating, the Ukrainians stood fast in their efforts to preserve their cultural heritage and identity. However, the price they paid for that resistance was high. Up to 12 million Ukrainians were starved to death by the Communists during a year long confiscation of their food production. The genocide of the Ukrainians is one of the greatest in world history, and that Communist crime against humanity known as the "Holodomor."
In fact, neither the word "racism" nor "racist" can be found anywhere in the literature of any language before 1917. It appears that these words were simply made up and used by Trotsky and Vladimir Lenin [another Freemason whose original name was Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov] and their comrades in the place the word "tribalism" (ethnic cultural unity), which is a completely natural human phenomena, because it wasn't seen as malevolent enough for use in Communist propaganda.
Commies are currently using the word "racist" and now the term "White Supremist" here in America, in exactly the same way that they used it in Russia, and for exactly the same purposes. It's simply a propaganda meme aimed at atomization and the eventual genocide of a particular ethnic group (European-Americans), which would otherwise be predisposed to resist the intentional destruction of their society by Marxist revolutionaries.
#Marxist #Masonic #Freemason #Propaganda #Memes #Trotsky #Russia #takeover #WhiteGenocide #Lenin #Bolshevik
He also used this term in his book "History of the Russian Revolution" in order to give the impression that the Eastern Slavs (Ukrainians) were being selfish for wanting to preserve their unique cultural and ethnic identity in the face of the ethnic cleansing policies of the Communist revolutionaries.
In spite if the propaganda and the browbeating, the Ukrainians stood fast in their efforts to preserve their cultural heritage and identity. However, the price they paid for that resistance was high. Up to 12 million Ukrainians were starved to death by the Communists during a year long confiscation of their food production. The genocide of the Ukrainians is one of the greatest in world history, and that Communist crime against humanity known as the "Holodomor."
In fact, neither the word "racism" nor "racist" can be found anywhere in the literature of any language before 1917. It appears that these words were simply made up and used by Trotsky and Vladimir Lenin [another Freemason whose original name was Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov] and their comrades in the place the word "tribalism" (ethnic cultural unity), which is a completely natural human phenomena, because it wasn't seen as malevolent enough for use in Communist propaganda.
Commies are currently using the word "racist" and now the term "White Supremist" here in America, in exactly the same way that they used it in Russia, and for exactly the same purposes. It's simply a propaganda meme aimed at atomization and the eventual genocide of a particular ethnic group (European-Americans), which would otherwise be predisposed to resist the intentional destruction of their society by Marxist revolutionaries.
#Marxist #Masonic #Freemason #Propaganda #Memes #Trotsky #Russia #takeover #WhiteGenocide #Lenin #Bolshevik
A struggle session was a form of public humiliation and torture that was used by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) during the Revolution of 1949, and then again later during Mao's Great Leap Forward.
The aim of a Struggle Session was to shape public opinion and humiliate, persecute, or execute political rivals and those who were deemed political enemies. In general, the victim of a Struggle Session was forced to admit various crimes (i.e., resisting Communism) before a crowd of people who would verbally and physically abuse the victim until he or she confessed to their apostasy. It's like "taking a knee" is here today.
Since their society was racially homogeneous, and still very much is, by the way, the Commies pitted the people, most of whom were peasants, against the land owners (the "Landlords").
The same thing happened before that in 1917, during the Bolshevik Revolution. The Soviet Commies just pitted the have-nots (the "Serfs") against the haves (the "Bourgeoisie").
Here in America, where there is no peasant class really, they are simply pitting the people of color against the "white" majority population. Same Commie, divide-and-conquer strategy. Just a different implementation.
Considering what I see happening last Summer with the BLM/Antifa operations, which were being funded by Soros, Bezos, Gates, and the Chinese Communist Party, America has currently in the middle of a giant Struggle Session of sorts ever since March 13, 2020.
Will We The People continue to tolerate such things, or will we learn to say "NO!" for a change? Come on, folks. Do we really want to end up like the 90-100 million Chinese Nationalists who were eventually murdered by the Communists there during their complete overthrow of that society?
That could very well happen here too, unless we get off our knees, throw the stupid masks in the trash, and start saying "NO!" for a change. Otherwise, we will soon be living in a dystopic, one-world slave state, which is what these demons have been building for us to live in since the end of WWII.
#History #Communism #China #CCP #StruggleSession #Indocrination #SocialEngineering #Psychology
The aim of a Struggle Session was to shape public opinion and humiliate, persecute, or execute political rivals and those who were deemed political enemies. In general, the victim of a Struggle Session was forced to admit various crimes (i.e., resisting Communism) before a crowd of people who would verbally and physically abuse the victim until he or she confessed to their apostasy. It's like "taking a knee" is here today.
Since their society was racially homogeneous, and still very much is, by the way, the Commies pitted the people, most of whom were peasants, against the land owners (the "Landlords").
The same thing happened before that in 1917, during the Bolshevik Revolution. The Soviet Commies just pitted the have-nots (the "Serfs") against the haves (the "Bourgeoisie").
Here in America, where there is no peasant class really, they are simply pitting the people of color against the "white" majority population. Same Commie, divide-and-conquer strategy. Just a different implementation.
Considering what I see happening last Summer with the BLM/Antifa operations, which were being funded by Soros, Bezos, Gates, and the Chinese Communist Party, America has currently in the middle of a giant Struggle Session of sorts ever since March 13, 2020.
Will We The People continue to tolerate such things, or will we learn to say "NO!" for a change? Come on, folks. Do we really want to end up like the 90-100 million Chinese Nationalists who were eventually murdered by the Communists there during their complete overthrow of that society?
That could very well happen here too, unless we get off our knees, throw the stupid masks in the trash, and start saying "NO!" for a change. Otherwise, we will soon be living in a dystopic, one-world slave state, which is what these demons have been building for us to live in since the end of WWII.
#History #Communism #China #CCP #StruggleSession #Indocrination #SocialEngineering #Psychology
All events
Meals
Games
Places
Music
Pictures
Shared
Videos
Support Freedom
