THE RT-PCR TESTS ARE ARE A HUGE FRAUD
Positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests have been used as the justification for keeping large portions of the world locked down since March, 2020. Not reliable hospitalization or death rates; just positive PCR test numbers--a large portion of which are from people who have no symptoms of actual illness--are the triggers behind the shutdowns.
Experts are now coming forward in growing numbers denouncing mass PCR testing as foolhardy and nonsensical, if not outright criminal. Why? Because we're now finding that PCR tests rarely tell us anything truly useful, at least not when they're used as they have been so far.
You know that when the Globalist-controlled propaganda outlets like the Toilet Paper of Record, the New York Times is forced to admit that 90% of all "positive" COVID-19 tests are actually false positives, and that it's a waste of time to test asymptomatic people anyway, the gig is up. [38]
We now know that PCR tests:
1. Cannot distinguish between "live" viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles and therefore cannot be used as a diagnostic tool--For this reason, it is grossly misleading to refer to a positive test as a "COVID-19 case."
As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness lecture, featured in "How Medical Technocracy Made the PLANdemic Possible," media and public health officials appear to have purposefully conflated "cases" or positive tests with the actual illness. [1]
Medically speaking, a "case" refers to a sick person. It never ever referred to someone who had no symptoms of illness. Now all of a sudden, this well-established medical term, "case," has been arbitrarily redefined to mean someone who tested positive for the presence of noninfectious viral RNA. As noted by Merritt, "That is not epidemiology. That's fraud."
2. Cannot confirm that SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.
3. Have not been established for monitoring the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
4. Have exceptionally high false result rates--The higher the cycle threshold (CT)--i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles--the greater the chance of a false positive.
While any CT over 35 is deemed scientifically unjustifiable, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend running PCR tests at a CT of 40. [2][3][4][5]
Drosten tests and tests recommended by the World Health Organization are set to a CT of 45. These excessively high CTs guarantee the appearance of widespread (pandemic) infection when infection rates are in fact low.
THE CYCLE THRESHOLD IS THE KEY TO THE PANDEMIC
Many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many times, which results in healthy people testing "positive" for SARS-CoV-2 infection and being ordered to take off work and self-isolate for two weeks.
To optimize accuracy and avoid imposing unnecessary hardship on healthy people, PCR tests must be run at far fewer cycles than the 40 to 45 CTs currently recommended.
Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero.
An April 2020 study in the European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases showed that to get 100% confirmed real positives, the PCR test must be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically. [6]
By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy rate is a mere 20%, meaning 80% are false positives. Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero, as illustrated in the following graph from that study. [7]
By running PCR tests at 40 to 45 amplification cycles, you end up with the false appearance of an outbreak, and this grossly flawed testing scheme is what government leaders are basing their mask mandates and lockdown orders on.
Percentage of positive viral culture of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive nasopharyngeal samples from Covid-19 patients, according to Ct value (plain line). The dashed curve indicates the polynomial regression curve.
SCIENTIFIC REVIEW CONFIRMS PCR FLAWS
More recently, a December 3, 2020, systematic review published in the journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases assessed the findings of 29 different studies--all of which were published in 2020--comparing evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection with the CTs used in testing. They also looked at the timing of the test, and how symptom severity relates to PCR test results. [8] As reported by the authors:
"The data suggest a relationship between the time from onset of symptom to the timing of the specimen test, cycle threshold (CT) and symptom severity. Twelve studies reported that CT values were significantly lower and log copies higher in specimens producing live virus culture.
"Two studies reported the odds of live virus culture reduced by approximately 33% for every one unit increase in CT. Six of eight studies reported detectable RNA for longer than 14 days but infectious potential declined after day 8 even among cases with ongoing high viral loads..."
In other words, if you have symptoms of COVID-19, by Day 8 from the onset of symptoms, the chances of you spreading it to others starts to decline, and in the days following, you are unlikely to be infectious even if you still test positive. This is particularly true if the PCR test is using a higher than ideal CT. [9] As noted by the authors:
"Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR. Prospective routine testing of reference and culture specimens and their relationship to symptoms, signs and patient co-factors should be used to define the reliability of PCR for assessing infectious potential. Those with high cycle threshold are unlikely to have infectious potential."
LIVE VIRUS UNLIKELY IN TESTS USING CT ABOVE 24
According to The New York Times, researchers have been "unable to grow the coronavirus out of samples from volunteers whose PCR tests had CT values above 27," and if the virus cannot replicate, you will not get ill and are not infectious, so you cannot spread it to others. [10]
The Clinical Infectious Diseases review confirms this. Under the heading "The Relationship Between RT-PCR Results and Viral Culture of SARS-CoV-2," they point out that "significantly lower" CTs were used in studies that correctly identified infectious patients. [11][12]
Five of the studies included were unable to identify any live viruses in cases where a positive PCR test had used a CT above 24. What's more, in order to produce live virus culture, a patient whose PCR test used a CT at or above 35 had to be symptomatic.
So, to clarify, if you have symptoms of COVID-19 and test positive using a PCR test that was run at 35 amplification cycles or higher, then you are likely to be infected and infectious.
However, if you do not have symptoms, yet test positive using a PCR test run at 35 CTs or higher, then it is likely a false positive and you pose no risk to others as you're unlikely to carry any live virus. In fact, provided you're asymptomatic, you're unlikely to be infectious even if you test positive with a test run at 24 CTs or higher.
TIMING OF PCR TEST ALSO MATTERS
The Clinical Infectious Diseases review also confirmed that the timing of the test matters. [13] According to the authors:
"...there appears to be a time window during which RNA detection is at its highest with low cycle threshold and higher possibility of culturing a live virus, with viral load and probability of growing live virus of SARS-CoV2... We propose that further work should be done on this with the aim of constructing an algorithm for integrating the results of PCR with other variables, to increase the effectiveness of detecting infectious patients."
Another scientific review that looked into how the timing of the test influences results and your risk of being infectious was posted on the preprint server medRxiv September 29, 2020. Fourteen studies were included in this review. [14][15]
The data show that your chances of getting a true positive on the first day of COVID-19 symptom onset is only about 40%. Not until Day 3 from symptom onset do you have an 80% chance of getting an accurate PCR result.
By Day 5 the accuracy shrinks considerably and by Day 8 the accuracy is nil. Now, these are symptomatic people. When you're asymptomatic, your odds of a positive PCR test being accurate is virtually nonexistent.
The graph below, from one of the studies included in the review (Bullard et. al.), illustrates the probability of a patient being infectious (having live virus) based on the CT used and the timing of the test. [16][17] As explained by the review authors:
"The figure... shows how the probability of SARS-CoV-2 infectious virus is greater (the red bars) when the cycle threshold is lower (the blue line) and when symptoms to test time is shorter--beyond 8 days, no live virus was detected."
FLORIDA TO REQUIRE DISCLOSURE OF CT DATA
Even though health authorities know that high CTs result in high rates of false positives, they do not specify the CT used for the PCR tests they're reporting. Fortunately, that's about to change in Florida, which just became the first state to require all labs in the state to report the CT used for their PCR tests. [18]
The Florida Health Department issued the order December 3, 2020, and labs must comply with the new mandatory reporting rule within seven days. [19]
This could prove quite interesting, especially if the state health department decides to invalidate positive results obtained from tests run above a certain amplification threshold. Time will tell exactly how this reporting requirement might influence pandemic response measures such as mask mandates and lockdowns.
PORTUGAL RULES QUARANTINE BASED ON PCR RESULTS IS UNLAWFUL
In related news, an appeals court in Portugal recently ruled that the PCR test is "not a reliable test for SARS-CoV-2" and that "a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection." Therefore, "any enforced quarantine based on the results is unlawful." [20][21][22]
The court also noted that forcing healthy people to self-isolate could be a violation of their fundamental right to liberty. The case was brought by four German tourists who had been forced to self-quarantine after one of them tested positive.
Several scientific studies were brought forth as evidence in this case, including a September 28, 2020, study in Clinical Infectious Diseases, which found that when you run a PCR test at a CT of 35 or higher, the accuracy drops to 3%, resulting in a 97% false positive rate. The court ruled that, based on the science presented, any PCR test using a CT over is unreliable. [23][25]
FATAL ERRORS FOUND IN PAPER ON WHICH PCR TESTING IS BASED
The Portuguese appeals court is not alone in its critique of the PCR test being used as the sole criteria for quarantine. November 30, 2020, the scientific paper describing the work flow of how to use the PCR test to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection--which was quickly accepted as the standard by the WHO and applied across the world--was challenged by 22 international scientists who demand that the paper be retracted due to "fatal errors." [24][25][26]
The paper in question was written by Christian Drosten, Ph.D., a German virologist, and Victor Corman, who heads a German working group on virus diagnostics and clinical virology. According to Reiner Fuellmich, founding member of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss, or ACU), Drosten is a key culprit in the COVID-19 pandemic hoax. [27][28][29][30]
One of the key "fatal errors" in the Corman-Drosten paper is that they wrote it--and developed the PCR test--before there was any viral isolate available. All they used was the genetic sequence published online by Chinese scientists in January 2020.
Interestingly, the supposedly peer-reviewed] paper was published a mere 24 hours after it was submitted, which suggests that it actually wasn't peer-reviewed before being embraced by the whole world. How could it have been in such a short time? Undercover DC interviewed Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of the 22 scientists who are now demanding the paper's retraction, who stated: [31]
"Every scientific rationale for the development of that test has been totally destroyed by this paper. It's like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the COVID test.
"When Drosten developed the test, China hadn't given them a viral isolate. They developed the test from a sequence in a gene bank. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. They had a code, but no body for the code. No viral morphology.
"In the fish market, it's like giving you a few bones and saying 'that's your fish.' It could be any fish... Listen, the Corman-Drosten paper, there's nothing from a patient in it. It's all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren't there they made up.
"They synthetically created them to fill in the blanks. That's what genetics is; it's a code. So, its ABBBCCDDD and you're missing some, what you think is EEE, so you put it in... This is basically a computer virus.
"There are 10 fatal errors in this Drosten test paper... But here is the bottom line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they were doing. The PCR products of the amplification didn't correspond to any viral isolate at that time. I call it 'donut ring science.' There is nothing at the center of it. It's all about code, genetics, nothing to do with reality...
"There have since been papers saying they've produced viral isolates. But there are no controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July... where they said: 'Here's the viral isolate.' Do you know what they did? They swabbed one person. One person, who'd been to China and had cold symptoms. One person. And they assumed he had [COVID-19] to begin with. So, it's all full of holes, the whole thing."
NO VIABLE VIRUS FOUND IN POSITIVE CASES
The critique against PCR testing is further strengthened by a November 20, 2020, study in Nature Communications, which found no viable virus in PCR-positive cases. The study evaluated data from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan, China, who had undergone PCR testing between May 14 and June 1, 2020. [32]
A total of 300 tested positive but had no symptoms. Of the 34,424 people with a history of COVID-19, 107 tested positive a second time. Yet when they did virus cultures on these 407 individuals who had tested positive (either for the first or second time), no live virus was ever found.
EXPOSE THE FRAUD AND END THE MISERY
A number of experts have now come forward, calling out the COVID-19 pandemic as a cruel hoax perpetuated by fatally flawed testing. Aside from this testing data, there's no evidence of a lethal pandemic at all. While there is such a thing as COVID-19, and people have and do die from it, there are no excess deaths due to it. [33][34][35]
In other words, the total Mortality Rate for 2020 is basically normal, not significantly different than it has been over the past decade, in fact, especially when you consider things like population increases. The pandemic has not killed more people than would die in any given year--from something, anything--anyway. So, unless we think we should shut down the world and stop living because people die from heart disease, diabetes, cancer, the flu or anything else, then there's no reason to shut down the world because some people happen to die from COVID-19. [39]
The good news is the hoax is starting to be exposed, and will continue to be exposed as more cases are brought before the courts of the world. As for what you can do, consider:
- Turning off mainstream media news, and turning instead to independent experts. Do the research. Read through the science.
- Continue to counter the censorship by asking questions--The more questions are asked, the more answers will come to light. Arm yourself with mortality statistics and the facts on PCR testing, so you can explain how and why this pandemic simply isn't really a grave one that justifies the sort of Draconian "counter-measures" that are currently being implemented.
- If you are a medical professional, especially if you're a member of a professional society, write an open letter to your government, urging them to speak to and heed recommendations from independent experts. Sign The Great Barrington Declaration, which calls for an end to lockdowns. [36]
REFERENCES
1. https://www.ddponline.org/
2. https://tinyurl.com/yc67yo8e
3. https://tinyurl.com/y494kz2v
4. https://youtu.be/a_Vy6fgaBPE?t=260
5. https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
6, 7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10096-020-03913-9
7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13. https://tinyurl.com/yyyjun95
14, 17. https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/infectious-positive-pcr-test-result-covid-19/
15. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.04.20167932v4
16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32442256/
18. https://tinyurl.com/yc3w3jvk
19. https://tinyurl.com/y56ht8wn
20. https://tinyurl.com/yynsvyw4
21. https://tinyurl.com/yxhxywrb
22. https://tinyurl.com/y46uybaq
23. https://tinyurl.com/yxs6d4gl
24. https://tinyurl.com/rrepus7
25. https://cormandrostenreview.com/
26, 31. https://tinyurl.com/y4xgsck8
27. https://www.fuellmich.com/dr-reiner-fuellmich/
28. https://acu2020.org/
29. https://acu2020.org/english-versions/
30. https://tinyurl.com/yd3cpqpg
32. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
33. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjYvitCeMPc
34. https://tinyurl.com/y9fcl2gl
35. https://tinyurl.com/yyryvj9x
36. https://gbdeclaration.org/
37. https://tinyurl.com/y73j4ruu
38. https://tinyurl.com/yymmcdfr
39. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/provisional-tables.htm
#Medicine #COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #WHO #Society #Freedom #Pandemics #Epidemiology #PCRTests #PCRTesting #Medicine #Virology #COVIDTruth #ScientificFraud
Positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests have been used as the justification for keeping large portions of the world locked down since March, 2020. Not reliable hospitalization or death rates; just positive PCR test numbers--a large portion of which are from people who have no symptoms of actual illness--are the triggers behind the shutdowns.
Experts are now coming forward in growing numbers denouncing mass PCR testing as foolhardy and nonsensical, if not outright criminal. Why? Because we're now finding that PCR tests rarely tell us anything truly useful, at least not when they're used as they have been so far.
You know that when the Globalist-controlled propaganda outlets like the Toilet Paper of Record, the New York Times is forced to admit that 90% of all "positive" COVID-19 tests are actually false positives, and that it's a waste of time to test asymptomatic people anyway, the gig is up. [38]
We now know that PCR tests:
1. Cannot distinguish between "live" viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles and therefore cannot be used as a diagnostic tool--For this reason, it is grossly misleading to refer to a positive test as a "COVID-19 case."
As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness lecture, featured in "How Medical Technocracy Made the PLANdemic Possible," media and public health officials appear to have purposefully conflated "cases" or positive tests with the actual illness. [1]
Medically speaking, a "case" refers to a sick person. It never ever referred to someone who had no symptoms of illness. Now all of a sudden, this well-established medical term, "case," has been arbitrarily redefined to mean someone who tested positive for the presence of noninfectious viral RNA. As noted by Merritt, "That is not epidemiology. That's fraud."
2. Cannot confirm that SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.
3. Have not been established for monitoring the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
4. Have exceptionally high false result rates--The higher the cycle threshold (CT)--i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles--the greater the chance of a false positive.
While any CT over 35 is deemed scientifically unjustifiable, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend running PCR tests at a CT of 40. [2][3][4][5]
Drosten tests and tests recommended by the World Health Organization are set to a CT of 45. These excessively high CTs guarantee the appearance of widespread (pandemic) infection when infection rates are in fact low.
THE CYCLE THRESHOLD IS THE KEY TO THE PANDEMIC
Many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many times, which results in healthy people testing "positive" for SARS-CoV-2 infection and being ordered to take off work and self-isolate for two weeks.
To optimize accuracy and avoid imposing unnecessary hardship on healthy people, PCR tests must be run at far fewer cycles than the 40 to 45 CTs currently recommended.
Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero.
An April 2020 study in the European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases showed that to get 100% confirmed real positives, the PCR test must be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically. [6]
By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy rate is a mere 20%, meaning 80% are false positives. Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero, as illustrated in the following graph from that study. [7]
By running PCR tests at 40 to 45 amplification cycles, you end up with the false appearance of an outbreak, and this grossly flawed testing scheme is what government leaders are basing their mask mandates and lockdown orders on.
Percentage of positive viral culture of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive nasopharyngeal samples from Covid-19 patients, according to Ct value (plain line). The dashed curve indicates the polynomial regression curve.
SCIENTIFIC REVIEW CONFIRMS PCR FLAWS
More recently, a December 3, 2020, systematic review published in the journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases assessed the findings of 29 different studies--all of which were published in 2020--comparing evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection with the CTs used in testing. They also looked at the timing of the test, and how symptom severity relates to PCR test results. [8] As reported by the authors:
"The data suggest a relationship between the time from onset of symptom to the timing of the specimen test, cycle threshold (CT) and symptom severity. Twelve studies reported that CT values were significantly lower and log copies higher in specimens producing live virus culture.
"Two studies reported the odds of live virus culture reduced by approximately 33% for every one unit increase in CT. Six of eight studies reported detectable RNA for longer than 14 days but infectious potential declined after day 8 even among cases with ongoing high viral loads..."
In other words, if you have symptoms of COVID-19, by Day 8 from the onset of symptoms, the chances of you spreading it to others starts to decline, and in the days following, you are unlikely to be infectious even if you still test positive. This is particularly true if the PCR test is using a higher than ideal CT. [9] As noted by the authors:
"Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR. Prospective routine testing of reference and culture specimens and their relationship to symptoms, signs and patient co-factors should be used to define the reliability of PCR for assessing infectious potential. Those with high cycle threshold are unlikely to have infectious potential."
LIVE VIRUS UNLIKELY IN TESTS USING CT ABOVE 24
According to The New York Times, researchers have been "unable to grow the coronavirus out of samples from volunteers whose PCR tests had CT values above 27," and if the virus cannot replicate, you will not get ill and are not infectious, so you cannot spread it to others. [10]
The Clinical Infectious Diseases review confirms this. Under the heading "The Relationship Between RT-PCR Results and Viral Culture of SARS-CoV-2," they point out that "significantly lower" CTs were used in studies that correctly identified infectious patients. [11][12]
Five of the studies included were unable to identify any live viruses in cases where a positive PCR test had used a CT above 24. What's more, in order to produce live virus culture, a patient whose PCR test used a CT at or above 35 had to be symptomatic.
So, to clarify, if you have symptoms of COVID-19 and test positive using a PCR test that was run at 35 amplification cycles or higher, then you are likely to be infected and infectious.
However, if you do not have symptoms, yet test positive using a PCR test run at 35 CTs or higher, then it is likely a false positive and you pose no risk to others as you're unlikely to carry any live virus. In fact, provided you're asymptomatic, you're unlikely to be infectious even if you test positive with a test run at 24 CTs or higher.
TIMING OF PCR TEST ALSO MATTERS
The Clinical Infectious Diseases review also confirmed that the timing of the test matters. [13] According to the authors:
"...there appears to be a time window during which RNA detection is at its highest with low cycle threshold and higher possibility of culturing a live virus, with viral load and probability of growing live virus of SARS-CoV2... We propose that further work should be done on this with the aim of constructing an algorithm for integrating the results of PCR with other variables, to increase the effectiveness of detecting infectious patients."
Another scientific review that looked into how the timing of the test influences results and your risk of being infectious was posted on the preprint server medRxiv September 29, 2020. Fourteen studies were included in this review. [14][15]
The data show that your chances of getting a true positive on the first day of COVID-19 symptom onset is only about 40%. Not until Day 3 from symptom onset do you have an 80% chance of getting an accurate PCR result.
By Day 5 the accuracy shrinks considerably and by Day 8 the accuracy is nil. Now, these are symptomatic people. When you're asymptomatic, your odds of a positive PCR test being accurate is virtually nonexistent.
The graph below, from one of the studies included in the review (Bullard et. al.), illustrates the probability of a patient being infectious (having live virus) based on the CT used and the timing of the test. [16][17] As explained by the review authors:
"The figure... shows how the probability of SARS-CoV-2 infectious virus is greater (the red bars) when the cycle threshold is lower (the blue line) and when symptoms to test time is shorter--beyond 8 days, no live virus was detected."
FLORIDA TO REQUIRE DISCLOSURE OF CT DATA
Even though health authorities know that high CTs result in high rates of false positives, they do not specify the CT used for the PCR tests they're reporting. Fortunately, that's about to change in Florida, which just became the first state to require all labs in the state to report the CT used for their PCR tests. [18]
The Florida Health Department issued the order December 3, 2020, and labs must comply with the new mandatory reporting rule within seven days. [19]
This could prove quite interesting, especially if the state health department decides to invalidate positive results obtained from tests run above a certain amplification threshold. Time will tell exactly how this reporting requirement might influence pandemic response measures such as mask mandates and lockdowns.
PORTUGAL RULES QUARANTINE BASED ON PCR RESULTS IS UNLAWFUL
In related news, an appeals court in Portugal recently ruled that the PCR test is "not a reliable test for SARS-CoV-2" and that "a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection." Therefore, "any enforced quarantine based on the results is unlawful." [20][21][22]
The court also noted that forcing healthy people to self-isolate could be a violation of their fundamental right to liberty. The case was brought by four German tourists who had been forced to self-quarantine after one of them tested positive.
Several scientific studies were brought forth as evidence in this case, including a September 28, 2020, study in Clinical Infectious Diseases, which found that when you run a PCR test at a CT of 35 or higher, the accuracy drops to 3%, resulting in a 97% false positive rate. The court ruled that, based on the science presented, any PCR test using a CT over is unreliable. [23][25]
FATAL ERRORS FOUND IN PAPER ON WHICH PCR TESTING IS BASED
The Portuguese appeals court is not alone in its critique of the PCR test being used as the sole criteria for quarantine. November 30, 2020, the scientific paper describing the work flow of how to use the PCR test to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection--which was quickly accepted as the standard by the WHO and applied across the world--was challenged by 22 international scientists who demand that the paper be retracted due to "fatal errors." [24][25][26]
The paper in question was written by Christian Drosten, Ph.D., a German virologist, and Victor Corman, who heads a German working group on virus diagnostics and clinical virology. According to Reiner Fuellmich, founding member of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss, or ACU), Drosten is a key culprit in the COVID-19 pandemic hoax. [27][28][29][30]
One of the key "fatal errors" in the Corman-Drosten paper is that they wrote it--and developed the PCR test--before there was any viral isolate available. All they used was the genetic sequence published online by Chinese scientists in January 2020.
Interestingly, the supposedly peer-reviewed] paper was published a mere 24 hours after it was submitted, which suggests that it actually wasn't peer-reviewed before being embraced by the whole world. How could it have been in such a short time? Undercover DC interviewed Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of the 22 scientists who are now demanding the paper's retraction, who stated: [31]
"Every scientific rationale for the development of that test has been totally destroyed by this paper. It's like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the COVID test.
"When Drosten developed the test, China hadn't given them a viral isolate. They developed the test from a sequence in a gene bank. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. They had a code, but no body for the code. No viral morphology.
"In the fish market, it's like giving you a few bones and saying 'that's your fish.' It could be any fish... Listen, the Corman-Drosten paper, there's nothing from a patient in it. It's all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren't there they made up.
"They synthetically created them to fill in the blanks. That's what genetics is; it's a code. So, its ABBBCCDDD and you're missing some, what you think is EEE, so you put it in... This is basically a computer virus.
"There are 10 fatal errors in this Drosten test paper... But here is the bottom line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they were doing. The PCR products of the amplification didn't correspond to any viral isolate at that time. I call it 'donut ring science.' There is nothing at the center of it. It's all about code, genetics, nothing to do with reality...
"There have since been papers saying they've produced viral isolates. But there are no controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July... where they said: 'Here's the viral isolate.' Do you know what they did? They swabbed one person. One person, who'd been to China and had cold symptoms. One person. And they assumed he had [COVID-19] to begin with. So, it's all full of holes, the whole thing."
NO VIABLE VIRUS FOUND IN POSITIVE CASES
The critique against PCR testing is further strengthened by a November 20, 2020, study in Nature Communications, which found no viable virus in PCR-positive cases. The study evaluated data from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan, China, who had undergone PCR testing between May 14 and June 1, 2020. [32]
A total of 300 tested positive but had no symptoms. Of the 34,424 people with a history of COVID-19, 107 tested positive a second time. Yet when they did virus cultures on these 407 individuals who had tested positive (either for the first or second time), no live virus was ever found.
EXPOSE THE FRAUD AND END THE MISERY
A number of experts have now come forward, calling out the COVID-19 pandemic as a cruel hoax perpetuated by fatally flawed testing. Aside from this testing data, there's no evidence of a lethal pandemic at all. While there is such a thing as COVID-19, and people have and do die from it, there are no excess deaths due to it. [33][34][35]
In other words, the total Mortality Rate for 2020 is basically normal, not significantly different than it has been over the past decade, in fact, especially when you consider things like population increases. The pandemic has not killed more people than would die in any given year--from something, anything--anyway. So, unless we think we should shut down the world and stop living because people die from heart disease, diabetes, cancer, the flu or anything else, then there's no reason to shut down the world because some people happen to die from COVID-19. [39]
The good news is the hoax is starting to be exposed, and will continue to be exposed as more cases are brought before the courts of the world. As for what you can do, consider:
- Turning off mainstream media news, and turning instead to independent experts. Do the research. Read through the science.
- Continue to counter the censorship by asking questions--The more questions are asked, the more answers will come to light. Arm yourself with mortality statistics and the facts on PCR testing, so you can explain how and why this pandemic simply isn't really a grave one that justifies the sort of Draconian "counter-measures" that are currently being implemented.
- If you are a medical professional, especially if you're a member of a professional society, write an open letter to your government, urging them to speak to and heed recommendations from independent experts. Sign The Great Barrington Declaration, which calls for an end to lockdowns. [36]
REFERENCES
1. https://www.ddponline.org/
2. https://tinyurl.com/yc67yo8e
3. https://tinyurl.com/y494kz2v
4. https://youtu.be/a_Vy6fgaBPE?t=260
5. https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
6, 7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10096-020-03913-9
7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13. https://tinyurl.com/yyyjun95
14, 17. https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/infectious-positive-pcr-test-result-covid-19/
15. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.04.20167932v4
16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32442256/
18. https://tinyurl.com/yc3w3jvk
19. https://tinyurl.com/y56ht8wn
20. https://tinyurl.com/yynsvyw4
21. https://tinyurl.com/yxhxywrb
22. https://tinyurl.com/y46uybaq
23. https://tinyurl.com/yxs6d4gl
24. https://tinyurl.com/rrepus7
25. https://cormandrostenreview.com/
26, 31. https://tinyurl.com/y4xgsck8
27. https://www.fuellmich.com/dr-reiner-fuellmich/
28. https://acu2020.org/
29. https://acu2020.org/english-versions/
30. https://tinyurl.com/yd3cpqpg
32. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
33. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjYvitCeMPc
34. https://tinyurl.com/y9fcl2gl
35. https://tinyurl.com/yyryvj9x
36. https://gbdeclaration.org/
37. https://tinyurl.com/y73j4ruu
38. https://tinyurl.com/yymmcdfr
39. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/provisional-tables.htm
#Medicine #COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #WHO #Society #Freedom #Pandemics #Epidemiology #PCRTests #PCRTesting #Medicine #Virology #COVIDTruth #ScientificFraud
Post
In the not-too-distant future, you will own absolutely nothing, but you'll like it, and you'll "be happy." That is, according to the totalitarians and Deep State globalists pushing what they call the "Great Reset." You will also have no privacy, they say. And yet, somehow, the advocates of this feudalistic vision -- the World Economic Forum (WEF), the United Nations (UN), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and more -- have decreed that "you'll be happy." It's all so over-the-top that even hardcore leftists are beginning to freak out.
This nightmarish description of the future envisioned under the "Great Reset" is no exaggeration. In fact, in a propaganda video posted on the World Economic Forum's social-media accounts, the powerful globalist organization uses exactly those words. In pushing the Great Reset, the video offers what it describes as "8 predictions for the world in 2030." The very first statement declares: "You'll own nothing, and you'll be happy." It claims these predictions are based on "input" from "members of the World Economic Forum's Global Future Councils."
Then comes the first forecast. Instead of owning property and the necessities of life, the WEF video declares, "you'll rent." Apparently "whatever you want" will be magically "delivered by drone." Except meat, apparently, since the video goes on to predict that "you'll eat much less meat" for the benefit of the planet. Incidentally, as part of its "Great Reset" agenda, the WEF has also been peddling the disgusting notion that you must eat bugs, weeds, and seaweed instead of normal food -- all to save the "climate" from the gas of life (CO2).
The bizarre video was hardly a one-time event. In fact, in a post on the WEF website by Danish Parliamentarian Ida Auken, the globalist dream of a world in which none of the plebs own property was once again trumpeted. "Welcome to the year 2030," Auken writes. "I don't own anything. I don't own a car. I don't own a house. I don't own any appliances or any clothes. It might seem odd to you, but it makes perfect sense for us in this city."
Sounding like livestock that can talk, and forgetting that the farm animals will eventually be slaughtered or sheared, Auken gushes about how her generous overlords now give her everything she needs for free. "We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives," the WEF piece continues. "In our city we don't pay any rent, because someone else is using our free space whenever we do not need it. My living room is used for business meetings when I am not there." Privacy will be a thing of the past, too, Auken admits.
Critics blasted the plans. "For those of us who support free markets, the Great Reset is nothing short of terrifying," argued Justin Haskins with the Heartland Institute. "Our current crony capitalist system has many flaws, to be sure, but granting more power to the government agents who created that crony system and eroding property rights is not the best way forward. America is the world's most powerful, prosperous nation precisely because of the very market principles the Great Reset supporters loathe, not in spite of them."
As word spread about the WEF agenda, there was massive public outrage worldwide and intense scrutiny of the radical statements promoting an end to private property, privacy, and even humanity -- yes, a key element of the "Great Reset," according to its backers such as the WEF chief, is the "fusion" of man and machine. And so, the WEF appears to have pulled the English version of its video, though the Spanish one is still up on its YouTube channel. It also put a small disclaimer on the post describing it as a mere "scenario showing where we could be heading" intended to "start a discussion."
Despite the half-hearted efforts at damage control, the vision of the globalist elite is becoming clear. In announcing the Great Reset in June, WEF boss Klaus Schwab hinted several times at the enormous scope of the transformation envisioned. "Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed," he said about it in an article online. "In short, we need a ‘Great Reset' of capitalism."
The UN, which is openly peddling the Great Reset -- UN boss and longtime Socialist bigwig Antonio Guterres was one of the main speakers unveiling the scheme -- has been at the forefront of the war on private-property rights for decades. Sometimes, the UN, its member regimes, and its agencies even come out and express their hostility to private-property rights openly. A prime example came in 1976 when UN Habitat declared war on private land ownership.
"Land … cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market," the UN said in item 10 of its agenda following the UN Habitat I summit. "Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. Public control of land use is therefore indispensable."
Of course, the agenda to strip humanity of even basic God-given rights such as the ability to own property is not new. Over the last century, well over 100 million people were slaughtered by their own communist and socialist overlords as those regimes fiendishly sought to centralize control over all property and resources in the hands of the elites. In the Western world, some of the most powerful individuals of the last century have been working toward that goal on a global scale, too.
In his 1966 book Tragedy and Hope, Georgetown University historian Caroll Quigley describes a shadowy network of individuals behind the scenes and their effort to build a one-world system with themselves in charge. Quigley, a mentor to former President Bill Clinton, said he agreed with most of the goals. He even boasted of being close to the network, which often worked with communists, for decades, and of having the opportunity to examine their secret documents for a period of years. Then he spilled the beans in the explosive book.
"The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole," Quigley explained. "This system was to be controlled in feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent and private meetings and conferences."
Quigley's reference to feudalism is key. Under the feudalist system, only the ruling elites -- kings, lords, barons, and so on -- were permitted to own land and property. The serf class -- everyone else -- merely "rented" land, homes, equipment, capital, and so on from their overlords. Whatever their lords demanded, from military service and crops to children, had to be handed over on demand, otherwise the serf could be forced off the land he was "renting." As government responses to COVID-19 ravage the middle class while boosting crony mega-businesses such as Amazon, the new serf class is quickly emerging in America.
According to Quigley, the "apex" of the global feudalist system was to be the Bank for International Settlements, a scandal-plagued institution that came completely under the control of Adolph Hitler's National Socialists (Nazis) for a time. Quigley described the BIS as "a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations." But even the powerful central bank chiefs are not the true power behind the throne, Quigley revealed.
"It must not be felt that these heads of the world's chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not," the Clinton mentor and wanna-be member of the global elite explained in his book. "Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down." In short, the central bank bosses were mere technocrats serving their own masters.
Quigley's observations -- along with contemporary realities involving global elites stashing all their vast wealth in tax-exempt foundations -- offers powerful evidence that the elites pushing the elimination of private ownership do not intend to surrender their own property. In fact, like the monarchs, barons, and lords of feudal societies past, they intend to centralize control over all property and resources in their own hands. You will own nothing. You will be a serf. They will be your masters.
Accomplishing that goal on a worldwide level will require eliminating or discrediting the American system of God-given rights protected by government. And thus, other WEF predictions include the United States losing its status as the leading superpower, with a new order featuring "a handful of countries" that will "dominate" taking its place. Indeed, the engineered process of displacing America in favor of what globalists and communists call the "multi-polar world order" has been underway for years, with help from American elites. That is accelerating now. Even "Western values" will be "tested to the breaking point," the WEF video says.
Another prediction -- one that has been made repeatedly by UN agencies and climate alarmists for decades, and one that has consistently been proven wrong -- is that massive numbers of people will be displaced by "climate change." In fact, one billion people will be moving from Third World countries into the dying Western world, according to the WEF's "predictions." Many of those will be imported to America if the Deep State gets its way as part of a concerted effort to "fundamentally transform" the United States. "We'll have to do a better job at welcoming and integrating refugees," the WEF video says before mentioning a supposed search for "alien life."
The "Great Reset" agenda pushed by some of the most powerful organizations in the world is a clear and present danger to the life, liberty, and property of almost every person on the planet. In fact, it is practically a declaration of war on America's constitutional republic and the fundamental rights of every American. However, defeating the agenda is not impossible. Exposing its architects and their plan will be crucial. Then, withdrawing from the UN and the IMF, alongside a restoration of sound money and constitutional protections, can help protect America from these totalitarian schemes. But time is short.
It's time for us to get off our knees, throw the stupid masks in the trash, and start saying "NO!" for a change. We need to let the New World Order social engineers who rule over us know that we're not going to let them cram us into their rat maze anymore. So, let's all stand-up together and start challenging this giant, worldwide COVID-19 PSYOP
#WEF #GreatReset #NWO #ElitePlans #UnitedNations #COVID19
This nightmarish description of the future envisioned under the "Great Reset" is no exaggeration. In fact, in a propaganda video posted on the World Economic Forum's social-media accounts, the powerful globalist organization uses exactly those words. In pushing the Great Reset, the video offers what it describes as "8 predictions for the world in 2030." The very first statement declares: "You'll own nothing, and you'll be happy." It claims these predictions are based on "input" from "members of the World Economic Forum's Global Future Councils."
Then comes the first forecast. Instead of owning property and the necessities of life, the WEF video declares, "you'll rent." Apparently "whatever you want" will be magically "delivered by drone." Except meat, apparently, since the video goes on to predict that "you'll eat much less meat" for the benefit of the planet. Incidentally, as part of its "Great Reset" agenda, the WEF has also been peddling the disgusting notion that you must eat bugs, weeds, and seaweed instead of normal food -- all to save the "climate" from the gas of life (CO2).
The bizarre video was hardly a one-time event. In fact, in a post on the WEF website by Danish Parliamentarian Ida Auken, the globalist dream of a world in which none of the plebs own property was once again trumpeted. "Welcome to the year 2030," Auken writes. "I don't own anything. I don't own a car. I don't own a house. I don't own any appliances or any clothes. It might seem odd to you, but it makes perfect sense for us in this city."
Sounding like livestock that can talk, and forgetting that the farm animals will eventually be slaughtered or sheared, Auken gushes about how her generous overlords now give her everything she needs for free. "We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives," the WEF piece continues. "In our city we don't pay any rent, because someone else is using our free space whenever we do not need it. My living room is used for business meetings when I am not there." Privacy will be a thing of the past, too, Auken admits.
Critics blasted the plans. "For those of us who support free markets, the Great Reset is nothing short of terrifying," argued Justin Haskins with the Heartland Institute. "Our current crony capitalist system has many flaws, to be sure, but granting more power to the government agents who created that crony system and eroding property rights is not the best way forward. America is the world's most powerful, prosperous nation precisely because of the very market principles the Great Reset supporters loathe, not in spite of them."
As word spread about the WEF agenda, there was massive public outrage worldwide and intense scrutiny of the radical statements promoting an end to private property, privacy, and even humanity -- yes, a key element of the "Great Reset," according to its backers such as the WEF chief, is the "fusion" of man and machine. And so, the WEF appears to have pulled the English version of its video, though the Spanish one is still up on its YouTube channel. It also put a small disclaimer on the post describing it as a mere "scenario showing where we could be heading" intended to "start a discussion."
Despite the half-hearted efforts at damage control, the vision of the globalist elite is becoming clear. In announcing the Great Reset in June, WEF boss Klaus Schwab hinted several times at the enormous scope of the transformation envisioned. "Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed," he said about it in an article online. "In short, we need a ‘Great Reset' of capitalism."
The UN, which is openly peddling the Great Reset -- UN boss and longtime Socialist bigwig Antonio Guterres was one of the main speakers unveiling the scheme -- has been at the forefront of the war on private-property rights for decades. Sometimes, the UN, its member regimes, and its agencies even come out and express their hostility to private-property rights openly. A prime example came in 1976 when UN Habitat declared war on private land ownership.
"Land … cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market," the UN said in item 10 of its agenda following the UN Habitat I summit. "Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. Public control of land use is therefore indispensable."
Of course, the agenda to strip humanity of even basic God-given rights such as the ability to own property is not new. Over the last century, well over 100 million people were slaughtered by their own communist and socialist overlords as those regimes fiendishly sought to centralize control over all property and resources in the hands of the elites. In the Western world, some of the most powerful individuals of the last century have been working toward that goal on a global scale, too.
In his 1966 book Tragedy and Hope, Georgetown University historian Caroll Quigley describes a shadowy network of individuals behind the scenes and their effort to build a one-world system with themselves in charge. Quigley, a mentor to former President Bill Clinton, said he agreed with most of the goals. He even boasted of being close to the network, which often worked with communists, for decades, and of having the opportunity to examine their secret documents for a period of years. Then he spilled the beans in the explosive book.
"The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole," Quigley explained. "This system was to be controlled in feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent and private meetings and conferences."
Quigley's reference to feudalism is key. Under the feudalist system, only the ruling elites -- kings, lords, barons, and so on -- were permitted to own land and property. The serf class -- everyone else -- merely "rented" land, homes, equipment, capital, and so on from their overlords. Whatever their lords demanded, from military service and crops to children, had to be handed over on demand, otherwise the serf could be forced off the land he was "renting." As government responses to COVID-19 ravage the middle class while boosting crony mega-businesses such as Amazon, the new serf class is quickly emerging in America.
According to Quigley, the "apex" of the global feudalist system was to be the Bank for International Settlements, a scandal-plagued institution that came completely under the control of Adolph Hitler's National Socialists (Nazis) for a time. Quigley described the BIS as "a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations." But even the powerful central bank chiefs are not the true power behind the throne, Quigley revealed.
"It must not be felt that these heads of the world's chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not," the Clinton mentor and wanna-be member of the global elite explained in his book. "Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down." In short, the central bank bosses were mere technocrats serving their own masters.
Quigley's observations -- along with contemporary realities involving global elites stashing all their vast wealth in tax-exempt foundations -- offers powerful evidence that the elites pushing the elimination of private ownership do not intend to surrender their own property. In fact, like the monarchs, barons, and lords of feudal societies past, they intend to centralize control over all property and resources in their own hands. You will own nothing. You will be a serf. They will be your masters.
Accomplishing that goal on a worldwide level will require eliminating or discrediting the American system of God-given rights protected by government. And thus, other WEF predictions include the United States losing its status as the leading superpower, with a new order featuring "a handful of countries" that will "dominate" taking its place. Indeed, the engineered process of displacing America in favor of what globalists and communists call the "multi-polar world order" has been underway for years, with help from American elites. That is accelerating now. Even "Western values" will be "tested to the breaking point," the WEF video says.
Another prediction -- one that has been made repeatedly by UN agencies and climate alarmists for decades, and one that has consistently been proven wrong -- is that massive numbers of people will be displaced by "climate change." In fact, one billion people will be moving from Third World countries into the dying Western world, according to the WEF's "predictions." Many of those will be imported to America if the Deep State gets its way as part of a concerted effort to "fundamentally transform" the United States. "We'll have to do a better job at welcoming and integrating refugees," the WEF video says before mentioning a supposed search for "alien life."
The "Great Reset" agenda pushed by some of the most powerful organizations in the world is a clear and present danger to the life, liberty, and property of almost every person on the planet. In fact, it is practically a declaration of war on America's constitutional republic and the fundamental rights of every American. However, defeating the agenda is not impossible. Exposing its architects and their plan will be crucial. Then, withdrawing from the UN and the IMF, alongside a restoration of sound money and constitutional protections, can help protect America from these totalitarian schemes. But time is short.
It's time for us to get off our knees, throw the stupid masks in the trash, and start saying "NO!" for a change. We need to let the New World Order social engineers who rule over us know that we're not going to let them cram us into their rat maze anymore. So, let's all stand-up together and start challenging this giant, worldwide COVID-19 PSYOP
#WEF #GreatReset #NWO #ElitePlans #UnitedNations #COVID19
International Law Attorney Dr. Francis Boyle, professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law says that the "investigational" (experimental) Moderna and Pfizer mRNA injections are NOT "vaccines" according to any traditional definition of that word, and that SARS-CoV-2 is actually an offensive biological weapons that was developed at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Wuhan, China and at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, NC, and that anyone who wishes to refuse these injections may do so by evoking their Rights under the Nuremburg Accords by making the following declaration to anyone who attempts to either force you or coerce you into taking either one of these injections:
NOTICE: I hereby evoke my Rights under the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation to refuse to submit to any injection[s] by you or anyone else of any Messenger RNA (a.k.a., "mRNA"), or any other substance, into my body without my informed consent, which I hereby deny that I have ever given to you or anyone else, at any time.
Please be advised that the United States Government has prosecuted has convicted and executed Medical Doctors who have violated the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation; and that aiders and abettors of such crimes against humanity will be Nuremberg Crimes will be considered equally as guilty as those who actually commit such criminal acts directly.
Nuremburg Code on Medical Experimentation
https://www.fhi360.org/sites/all/libraries/webpages/fhi-retc2/Resources/nuremburg_code.pdf
Professor Boyle is an expert in International law and biological weapons. In fact, he drafted the US domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention, known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, which was approved unanimously by both Houses of the US Congress, and then and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush. He also prosecuted Slobodan Milosevic for his crimes against humanity at the Hague.
Dr Boyle is only licensed to practice Law in Illinois, but he says that he will assist anyone who pushes back against these injections by providing guidance and resources to your attorney. Simply contact him by email at fboyle@illinois.edu
#COVID19 #COVID19Truth #GeneticEngineering #Genocide #Vaccines #InternationalLaw #NuremburgAccords #MedicalExperimentation #FrancisBoyle
NOTICE: I hereby evoke my Rights under the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation to refuse to submit to any injection[s] by you or anyone else of any Messenger RNA (a.k.a., "mRNA"), or any other substance, into my body without my informed consent, which I hereby deny that I have ever given to you or anyone else, at any time.
Please be advised that the United States Government has prosecuted has convicted and executed Medical Doctors who have violated the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation; and that aiders and abettors of such crimes against humanity will be Nuremberg Crimes will be considered equally as guilty as those who actually commit such criminal acts directly.
Nuremburg Code on Medical Experimentation
https://www.fhi360.org/sites/all/libraries/webpages/fhi-retc2/Resources/nuremburg_code.pdf
Professor Boyle is an expert in International law and biological weapons. In fact, he drafted the US domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention, known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, which was approved unanimously by both Houses of the US Congress, and then and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush. He also prosecuted Slobodan Milosevic for his crimes against humanity at the Hague.
Dr Boyle is only licensed to practice Law in Illinois, but he says that he will assist anyone who pushes back against these injections by providing guidance and resources to your attorney. Simply contact him by email at fboyle@illinois.edu
#COVID19 #COVID19Truth #GeneticEngineering #Genocide #Vaccines #InternationalLaw #NuremburgAccords #MedicalExperimentation #FrancisBoyle
Now we know who REALLY won Michigan--Donald Trump. According to Michigan's official certification, Biden won by 154,000 votes. However, a post-election audit has revealed that 177,000 of the votes were cast by people who did not even live in the state.
So, just like the Epoch Times Newspaper reported in their great documentary, which I posted here in December, 2020, Trump actually won Michigan, if you just look at that one issue alone, and that does not even take into account all of the other fraud that has been revealed there in Michigan, and other states, but was never investigated or reported by the mainstream propaganda media.
Epoch Times Documentary
https://freedommovement.info/social/post/290
TheGatewayPundit Story
https://tinyurl.com/y8vf9vtp
#Election #Fraud #Trump #NWO #Communist #COVID19 #Takeover #Election2020 #StopTheSteal
So, just like the Epoch Times Newspaper reported in their great documentary, which I posted here in December, 2020, Trump actually won Michigan, if you just look at that one issue alone, and that does not even take into account all of the other fraud that has been revealed there in Michigan, and other states, but was never investigated or reported by the mainstream propaganda media.
Epoch Times Documentary
https://freedommovement.info/social/post/290
TheGatewayPundit Story
https://tinyurl.com/y8vf9vtp
#Election #Fraud #Trump #NWO #Communist #COVID19 #Takeover #Election2020 #StopTheSteal
This is an interview with Knut Wittkowski. He's not just some guy eating dinner in a cafe. He's a renowned Epidemiologist. In fact, he's the former Head of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Research Design at Rockefeller University.
He says that we should not have ever been locked-down, forced to wear masks, or social distance ourselves from one another, and that almost every aspect of this COVID-19 event has not only been miss-handled, a huge amount of scientific and statistical fraud has been committed against the American people.
He lives and works in New York City, so his perspective is a valuable one. Therefore, you would be wise to hear what he has to say, and compare that to the [miss]information that you are being force-fed by the mainstream propaganda media, and the Globalist bureaucrats like Anthony Fauci who remain perched on top of this giant PSYOP.
#COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #Pandemics #Epidemiology #Science #Statistics #Lockdowns #Quarantines #ScientificFraud #Health #Medicine #Flu #Fraud
He says that we should not have ever been locked-down, forced to wear masks, or social distance ourselves from one another, and that almost every aspect of this COVID-19 event has not only been miss-handled, a huge amount of scientific and statistical fraud has been committed against the American people.
He lives and works in New York City, so his perspective is a valuable one. Therefore, you would be wise to hear what he has to say, and compare that to the [miss]information that you are being force-fed by the mainstream propaganda media, and the Globalist bureaucrats like Anthony Fauci who remain perched on top of this giant PSYOP.
#COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #Pandemics #Epidemiology #Science #Statistics #Lockdowns #Quarantines #ScientificFraud #Health #Medicine #Flu #Fraud
