In a stunning rebuke of Leftist politicians and bureaucrats in the US and across much of The West, on October 8, 2020, the World Health Organization's special envoy on COVID-19 is urged world leaders to stop using lockdowns as the primary control method against the spread of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) virus, SARS-CoV-2, which causes the disease diagnosis that the WHO named COVID-19. "We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus," David Nabarro said. "The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we'd rather not do it."
Nabarro pointed to the collateral damage that lockdowns are having worldwide, especially among poorer populations.
"Just look at what's happened to the tourism industry, for example in the Caribbean or in the Pacific, because people aren't taking their holidays. Look what's happened to smallholder farmers all over the world because their markets have got dented. Look what's happening to poverty levels. It seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. Seems that we may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition because children are not getting meals at school and their parents, in poor families, are not able to afford it," Nabarro said.
"This is a terrible, ghastly global catastrophe actually," he added. "And so we really do appeal to all world leaders: Stop using lockdown as your primary control method, develop better systems for doing it, work together and learn from each other, but remember -- lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer."
Nabarro isn't the only scientist opposing lockdowns. A number of medical or public health scientists and medical practitioners have signed the Great Barrington Declaration, which states that "current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health."
https://gbdeclaration.org/
The signatories include: "Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University and a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring of infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations, Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases, and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations."
"The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk," the declaration states.
#UnitedNations #Virus #COVIDTruth #Pandemics #Epidemiology #Science #Statistics #Lockdowns #Quarantines #ScientificFraud #Health #Medicine #Fraud
Nabarro pointed to the collateral damage that lockdowns are having worldwide, especially among poorer populations.
"Just look at what's happened to the tourism industry, for example in the Caribbean or in the Pacific, because people aren't taking their holidays. Look what's happened to smallholder farmers all over the world because their markets have got dented. Look what's happening to poverty levels. It seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. Seems that we may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition because children are not getting meals at school and their parents, in poor families, are not able to afford it," Nabarro said.
"This is a terrible, ghastly global catastrophe actually," he added. "And so we really do appeal to all world leaders: Stop using lockdown as your primary control method, develop better systems for doing it, work together and learn from each other, but remember -- lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer."
Nabarro isn't the only scientist opposing lockdowns. A number of medical or public health scientists and medical practitioners have signed the Great Barrington Declaration, which states that "current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health."
https://gbdeclaration.org/
The signatories include: "Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University and a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring of infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations, Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases, and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations."
"The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk," the declaration states.
#UnitedNations #Virus #COVIDTruth #Pandemics #Epidemiology #Science #Statistics #Lockdowns #Quarantines #ScientificFraud #Health #Medicine #Fraud
Post
In Michigan, the Electoral College Electors were prevented by police from entering the State Capitol in order to vote for Trump. All caught on video by Right Side Broadcasting. Also in this video you will see the Electors in Nevada who voted for Trump on camera, but the mainstream propaganda media reported that they all voted for Biden. Wow! This is the next level of fraud.
#Election #Fraud #StopTheSteal #Michigan #Electors #ElectionFraud
#Election #Fraud #StopTheSteal #Michigan #Electors #ElectionFraud
When they finally got around to looking at blood samples from people who donated blood to the Red Cross in 2019, what they found was that the SARS-CoV-2 virus, even tough it's not nearly as dangerous of a virus as the Communist, Sinophile usurpers of our nation would have you believe, was actually already spreading throughout our country WAY before December 31, 2019, when the Chinese officially notified us of that fact.
As I said back in February, when I first dove headlong into research of this situation. the virus was released from the Wuhan lab in early October of 2020 during the World Military Games which were being held there, about one month before the infamous Event 201 exercise took place in New York City.
The Event 201 exercise was an exercise where the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic forum uncannily predicted and simulated the spread of a novel coronavirus that would emanate from a "wet market" in Wuhan.
Hmm. What a coincidence! Those guys were prophets. How could they possibly know?
It's also important to note that China, the country where this virus originated, has not been locked down, nor have they been imposing any Draconian masking or social distancing mandates on their citizens for over 7 months now, and their economy is literally BOOMING.
In fact, China has only suffered about 4,000 deaths to the virus, even though almost 1.8 billion people live there. Hmmm. Was this a race-specific bio-weapon, meant only to affect Europeans? Makes you wonder. Doesn't it?
#COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #Pandemics #Epidemiology #Science #Statistics #Lockdowns #Quarantines #ScientificFraud #Health #Medicine #Fraud
As I said back in February, when I first dove headlong into research of this situation. the virus was released from the Wuhan lab in early October of 2020 during the World Military Games which were being held there, about one month before the infamous Event 201 exercise took place in New York City.
The Event 201 exercise was an exercise where the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic forum uncannily predicted and simulated the spread of a novel coronavirus that would emanate from a "wet market" in Wuhan.
Hmm. What a coincidence! Those guys were prophets. How could they possibly know?
It's also important to note that China, the country where this virus originated, has not been locked down, nor have they been imposing any Draconian masking or social distancing mandates on their citizens for over 7 months now, and their economy is literally BOOMING.
In fact, China has only suffered about 4,000 deaths to the virus, even though almost 1.8 billion people live there. Hmmm. Was this a race-specific bio-weapon, meant only to affect Europeans? Makes you wonder. Doesn't it?
#COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #Pandemics #Epidemiology #Science #Statistics #Lockdowns #Quarantines #ScientificFraud #Health #Medicine #Fraud
As I've been telling everyone for over 10 months now, neither the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), nor any of its sub-agencies such as the NIH or the CDC, nor ANYONE ELSE in the world has EVER actually isolated (disaggregated) the SARS-CoV-2 virus in a laboratory from a tissue sample taken from ANY COVID-19 patient anywhere in the world. Nor has China ever provided anyone in the world with an physical sample of the SARS-CoV-2, or even a [complete] genome of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is the name of the [alleged] virus which the Communist Chinese/Bill Gates-controlled World Health Organization (WHO) says causes the disease that they named "COVID-19." [1]
That's right, folks. Notwithstanding the fact that millions of people are said to be infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and notwithstanding the fact that more than 200,000 Americans are alleged to have died from this virus, our so-called "health authorities" here in the U.S. and Canada, nor anyone else in the world, have never even bothered to take a biological sample from ANY COVID-19 patient in order to confirm the existence of that virus in that patient, or any other COVID-19 patient, in any scientifically-verifiable way
Let that sink in for a moment.
Wouldn't you think that would be necessary to develop reliable diagnostic tests and vaccines for any novel (new) pandemic level virus, especially for a virus that said "health authorities" are claiming is so deadly to humanity that it necessitates completely overturning civilization and redesigning it, coincidentally, into the shape the ruling elite have been actively planning to for over 10 years now, all in order to protect ourselves from that virus. [2] Of course, you would. Then, I ask, why is it that they have not done so already? After all, the NIH calls modern cell culture diagnosis "the gold standard" for the diagnosis of any virus. So, why on Earth not this one? [3]
Yet, these PCR Tests that are currently being used to diagnose patients with COVID-19, and the vaccines that are currently being developed at "warp speed," are all being manufactured based upon nothing but a computer-generated model of a virus.--a theoretical virus, not a "real" virus which has been properly isolated (scientifically proven to exist) in a laboratory, in accordance with NIH guidelines, so that its genome can be fully mapped, and physically examined under an electron microscope in order to confirm its true properties, and thereby be "quantified."
Not only that, folks. It gets worse.
The PCR tests that are currently being used are diagnosing people "positive" for COVID-19 whenever their tests match the genetic markers, which they have derived from their [theoretical] computer model of SARS-CoV-2. However, the problem with that is there are about 30,000 genes in a viral genome, and your average person on the street [without any SARS-CoV-2 infection, or any other viral infection] might match any number of these, or even all of the tiny subset of ONLY 37 markers that they are currently using in the PCR test to claim that people are positive for COVID-19. [4]
Don't just believe me, here's what a renowned physician, Dr. Tom Cowan has to tell you about this. He calls what's going on right now "scientific fraud." Indeed. Nope. It's actually worse than that. It's the Mother of All Frauds.
"This week, my colleague and friend Sally Fallon Morell brought to my attention an amazing article put out by the CDC. It was published in June, 2020. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.
"First, in the section titled Whole Genome Sequencing, we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, that the CDC 'designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512). [5]
"To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud.
"Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.
"The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by “consensus,” sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary “unicorn,” so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn." [6]
Footnotes
1. https://AlaskasList.com/freedom/open_letter.php
2. https://alaskaslist.com/extra/lock_step.php
3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850366/
4. https://www.nytimes.com/.../health/coronavirus-testing.html
5. http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article
6. https://tinyurl.com/4kw4htkp
#COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #Pandemics #Epidemiology #Science #Virology #Lockdowns #Quarantines #ScientificFraud #Health #Medicine #Flu #Fraud #Unicorns
That's right, folks. Notwithstanding the fact that millions of people are said to be infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and notwithstanding the fact that more than 200,000 Americans are alleged to have died from this virus, our so-called "health authorities" here in the U.S. and Canada, nor anyone else in the world, have never even bothered to take a biological sample from ANY COVID-19 patient in order to confirm the existence of that virus in that patient, or any other COVID-19 patient, in any scientifically-verifiable way
Let that sink in for a moment.
Wouldn't you think that would be necessary to develop reliable diagnostic tests and vaccines for any novel (new) pandemic level virus, especially for a virus that said "health authorities" are claiming is so deadly to humanity that it necessitates completely overturning civilization and redesigning it, coincidentally, into the shape the ruling elite have been actively planning to for over 10 years now, all in order to protect ourselves from that virus. [2] Of course, you would. Then, I ask, why is it that they have not done so already? After all, the NIH calls modern cell culture diagnosis "the gold standard" for the diagnosis of any virus. So, why on Earth not this one? [3]
Yet, these PCR Tests that are currently being used to diagnose patients with COVID-19, and the vaccines that are currently being developed at "warp speed," are all being manufactured based upon nothing but a computer-generated model of a virus.--a theoretical virus, not a "real" virus which has been properly isolated (scientifically proven to exist) in a laboratory, in accordance with NIH guidelines, so that its genome can be fully mapped, and physically examined under an electron microscope in order to confirm its true properties, and thereby be "quantified."
Not only that, folks. It gets worse.
The PCR tests that are currently being used are diagnosing people "positive" for COVID-19 whenever their tests match the genetic markers, which they have derived from their [theoretical] computer model of SARS-CoV-2. However, the problem with that is there are about 30,000 genes in a viral genome, and your average person on the street [without any SARS-CoV-2 infection, or any other viral infection] might match any number of these, or even all of the tiny subset of ONLY 37 markers that they are currently using in the PCR test to claim that people are positive for COVID-19. [4]
Don't just believe me, here's what a renowned physician, Dr. Tom Cowan has to tell you about this. He calls what's going on right now "scientific fraud." Indeed. Nope. It's actually worse than that. It's the Mother of All Frauds.
"This week, my colleague and friend Sally Fallon Morell brought to my attention an amazing article put out by the CDC. It was published in June, 2020. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.
"First, in the section titled Whole Genome Sequencing, we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, that the CDC 'designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512). [5]
"To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud.
"Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.
"The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by “consensus,” sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary “unicorn,” so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn." [6]
Footnotes
1. https://AlaskasList.com/freedom/open_letter.php
2. https://alaskaslist.com/extra/lock_step.php
3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850366/
4. https://www.nytimes.com/.../health/coronavirus-testing.html
5. http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article
6. https://tinyurl.com/4kw4htkp
#COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #Pandemics #Epidemiology #Science #Virology #Lockdowns #Quarantines #ScientificFraud #Health #Medicine #Flu #Fraud #Unicorns