We are living in an ocean of viruses. We always have been, and we always will be. There is no way to hide from viruses in our environment, which are everywhere in every cubic meter of air, soil, and water. In fact, being forced to wear masks, and unsocially distance ourselves from one another actually diminishes our body's natural ability to fight off viruses by weakening our immune systems.
Everybody, and I do mean everybody, has already been infected with viruses that, if they had a weak immune system, or if the "viral load" was high enough, might kill them, and the SARS-CoV-2 virus is no different.
If you are a reasonably healthy person under the age of 70, you have no more to fear from that coronavirus than you do any other type of RNA virus that you have very likely already been "infected" with but didn't even realize it.
To prove my point, I point you to a peer-reviewed study entitled "The blood DNA virome in 8,000 humans." This study was performed on 8,000 people who had absolutely no history of infectious disease. The blood of these people was screened in a lab, and what the researchers found was that 42% of the study's participants had as many as 94 different viruses in their bodies, including, but not limited to human DNA viruses, proviruses and RNA viruses [like SARS-CoV-2] such as herpesviruses, anelloviruses, papillomaviruses, three polyomaviruses, adenovirus, HIV, HTLV, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, parvovirus B19, and influenza virus and many many more.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28328962/
However, none of these people ever became sick from any of these antigens, because their healthy immune systems prevented that from happening, just like it's supposed to.
Such is the case with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that the [Communist] WHO says causes the disease that they named COVID-19. Millions upon millions of people will almost certainly test positive for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, especially using the terribly-flawed RT-PCR test, but only a tiny fraction of those people will ever become sickened by it, nor will they ever be able to transmit the virus to others unless they do become sick.
Viruses have been chasing men since before we climbed down from the trees. Our bodies fight them off. and then learn how to fight them off in the process. It's called Evolutionary Biology, stupid. We get sick. It's horrible, sometimes even fatal. But viruses recede, our body's defenses learn and strengthen. The process has been happening for millions of years, which is why more than 40 per cent of our genome is made of incorporated viral genetic material. The spread of viruses like SARS-CoV-2 is not new. What's new is the response of our so-called "leaders" to the pandemic, which amounts to nothing less than the greatest crime ever committed against humanity.
You're being lied to, folks. What's happening right now is not a justifiable, medically sound response to a grave viral pandemic. It's a giant, worldwide political PSYOP and Globalist takeover operation that's being led by the Chinese Communist Party and the millions of Leftist collaborators that they have both here in America and throughout the world.
Watch and learn...
#COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #Pandemics #Epidemiology #Science #Statistics #Lockdowns #Quarantines #ScientificFraud #Health #Medicine #Vaccines #Virology #MicroBiome #Environment #Study
Everybody, and I do mean everybody, has already been infected with viruses that, if they had a weak immune system, or if the "viral load" was high enough, might kill them, and the SARS-CoV-2 virus is no different.
If you are a reasonably healthy person under the age of 70, you have no more to fear from that coronavirus than you do any other type of RNA virus that you have very likely already been "infected" with but didn't even realize it.
To prove my point, I point you to a peer-reviewed study entitled "The blood DNA virome in 8,000 humans." This study was performed on 8,000 people who had absolutely no history of infectious disease. The blood of these people was screened in a lab, and what the researchers found was that 42% of the study's participants had as many as 94 different viruses in their bodies, including, but not limited to human DNA viruses, proviruses and RNA viruses [like SARS-CoV-2] such as herpesviruses, anelloviruses, papillomaviruses, three polyomaviruses, adenovirus, HIV, HTLV, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, parvovirus B19, and influenza virus and many many more.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28328962/
However, none of these people ever became sick from any of these antigens, because their healthy immune systems prevented that from happening, just like it's supposed to.
Such is the case with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that the [Communist] WHO says causes the disease that they named COVID-19. Millions upon millions of people will almost certainly test positive for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, especially using the terribly-flawed RT-PCR test, but only a tiny fraction of those people will ever become sickened by it, nor will they ever be able to transmit the virus to others unless they do become sick.
Viruses have been chasing men since before we climbed down from the trees. Our bodies fight them off. and then learn how to fight them off in the process. It's called Evolutionary Biology, stupid. We get sick. It's horrible, sometimes even fatal. But viruses recede, our body's defenses learn and strengthen. The process has been happening for millions of years, which is why more than 40 per cent of our genome is made of incorporated viral genetic material. The spread of viruses like SARS-CoV-2 is not new. What's new is the response of our so-called "leaders" to the pandemic, which amounts to nothing less than the greatest crime ever committed against humanity.
You're being lied to, folks. What's happening right now is not a justifiable, medically sound response to a grave viral pandemic. It's a giant, worldwide political PSYOP and Globalist takeover operation that's being led by the Chinese Communist Party and the millions of Leftist collaborators that they have both here in America and throughout the world.
Watch and learn...
#COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #Pandemics #Epidemiology #Science #Statistics #Lockdowns #Quarantines #ScientificFraud #Health #Medicine #Vaccines #Virology #MicroBiome #Environment #Study
Post
A new study on asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 not only proves it doesn't actually happen, it proves the panic promoted by the mainstream propaganda media and the masters, the ruling political class, regarding the possibility of asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 (spread by people who are not sick) was meant to control the populations, not to eradicate any disease.
In complete contradiction to the popular narrative used by Globalist politicians and governors across the United States, a new study of 10 million people in Wuhan, China, which was ground zero for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, showed that asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 does not occur, nullifying all reasoning for business closures, mandatory masking, social distancing, and lockdowns.
The study, published in the November issue of the peer-reviewed scientific journal Nature Communications, studied 9,899,828 residents of Wuhan, screening them between May 14, 2020 and June 1, 2020. The results provided clear evidence that there is no possibility of asymptomatic transmission of the virus from one person to another.
The study was compiled by 19 scientists from the Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, and highly respected scientific institutions in the UK and Australia.
Titled Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly 10 million residents of Wuhan, China, the study thoroughly debunked the concept of asymptomatic transmission.
"A total of 1,174 close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the COVID-19," the study concluded.
Both the asymptomatic patients and their contacts were placed in isolation for a period of no less than two weeks and the results remained the same. "None of detected positive cases or their close contacts became symptomatic or newly confirmed with COVID-19 during the isolation period," the study found.
Out of the nearly 10 million people in the study, results revealed "300 asymptomatic cases" were found. Utilizing contact tracing, of those 300, not a single case of COVID-19 was ever detected in any of them.
Asymptomatic spread of COVID not something that we should be afraid of. Wearing masks in public and social distancing makes no more sense that it would have made at any other time to fight any other contagious disease.
So, have some well considered hugs.
See "Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China" by Nature Communications.
#Medicine #COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #China #Society #Freedom #Pandemics #Epidemiology #PCRTests #PCRTesting #Science #Studies #Medicine #Virology #Study
In complete contradiction to the popular narrative used by Globalist politicians and governors across the United States, a new study of 10 million people in Wuhan, China, which was ground zero for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, showed that asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 does not occur, nullifying all reasoning for business closures, mandatory masking, social distancing, and lockdowns.
The study, published in the November issue of the peer-reviewed scientific journal Nature Communications, studied 9,899,828 residents of Wuhan, screening them between May 14, 2020 and June 1, 2020. The results provided clear evidence that there is no possibility of asymptomatic transmission of the virus from one person to another.
The study was compiled by 19 scientists from the Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, and highly respected scientific institutions in the UK and Australia.
Titled Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly 10 million residents of Wuhan, China, the study thoroughly debunked the concept of asymptomatic transmission.
"A total of 1,174 close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the COVID-19," the study concluded.
Both the asymptomatic patients and their contacts were placed in isolation for a period of no less than two weeks and the results remained the same. "None of detected positive cases or their close contacts became symptomatic or newly confirmed with COVID-19 during the isolation period," the study found.
Out of the nearly 10 million people in the study, results revealed "300 asymptomatic cases" were found. Utilizing contact tracing, of those 300, not a single case of COVID-19 was ever detected in any of them.
Asymptomatic spread of COVID not something that we should be afraid of. Wearing masks in public and social distancing makes no more sense that it would have made at any other time to fight any other contagious disease.
So, have some well considered hugs.
See "Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China" by Nature Communications.
#Medicine #COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #China #Society #Freedom #Pandemics #Epidemiology #PCRTests #PCRTesting #Science #Studies #Medicine #Virology #Study
Stringent COVID-19 control measures were imposed in Wuhan between January 23 and April 8, 2020. Estimates of the prevalence of infection following the release of restrictions could inform post-lockdown pandemic management. Here, we describe a city-wide SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening programme between May 14 and June 1, 2020 in Wuhan. All city re...
www.nature.com
Here you will see a screenshot of a Freedom of Information Act Request that was submitted to the Public Health Agency of Canada almost 6 months ago, requesting evidence that is absolutely essential (but not entirely sufficient on its own) for establishing the existence of the alleged "SARS-COV-2" virus.
Without this step having been performed (followed by controlled experiments), there is no way to claim scientifically that the alleged "novel coronavirus", (SARS-CoV-2), which is blamed for the disease diagnosis known as COVID-19, actually exists.
Without this step having been performed, and being followed by the necessary controlled experiments, all claims of this alleged virus are nothing but wild, unscientific, fraud-based speculation backed only by fraudulent science, fraudulent tests, and fraudulent RT-PCR diagnoses.
See all such requests...
https://tinyurl.com/ybw8ey8q
#Medicine #COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #WHO #Society #Freedom #Pandemics #Epidemiology #RT-PCRTests #RT-PCRTesting #Virology
Without this step having been performed (followed by controlled experiments), there is no way to claim scientifically that the alleged "novel coronavirus", (SARS-CoV-2), which is blamed for the disease diagnosis known as COVID-19, actually exists.
Without this step having been performed, and being followed by the necessary controlled experiments, all claims of this alleged virus are nothing but wild, unscientific, fraud-based speculation backed only by fraudulent science, fraudulent tests, and fraudulent RT-PCR diagnoses.
See all such requests...
https://tinyurl.com/ybw8ey8q
#Medicine #COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #WHO #Society #Freedom #Pandemics #Epidemiology #RT-PCRTests #RT-PCRTesting #Virology
THE RT-PCR TESTS ARE ARE A HUGE FRAUD
Positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests have been used as the justification for keeping large portions of the world locked down since March, 2020. Not reliable hospitalization or death rates; just positive PCR test numbers--a large portion of which are from people who have no symptoms of actual illness--are the triggers behind the shutdowns.
Experts are now coming forward in growing numbers denouncing mass PCR testing as foolhardy and nonsensical, if not outright criminal. Why? Because we're now finding that PCR tests rarely tell us anything truly useful, at least not when they're used as they have been so far.
You know that when the Globalist-controlled propaganda outlets like the Toilet Paper of Record, the New York Times is forced to admit that 90% of all "positive" COVID-19 tests are actually false positives, and that it's a waste of time to test asymptomatic people anyway, the gig is up. [38]
We now know that PCR tests:
1. Cannot distinguish between "live" viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles and therefore cannot be used as a diagnostic tool--For this reason, it is grossly misleading to refer to a positive test as a "COVID-19 case."
As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness lecture, featured in "How Medical Technocracy Made the PLANdemic Possible," media and public health officials appear to have purposefully conflated "cases" or positive tests with the actual illness. [1]
Medically speaking, a "case" refers to a sick person. It never ever referred to someone who had no symptoms of illness. Now all of a sudden, this well-established medical term, "case," has been arbitrarily redefined to mean someone who tested positive for the presence of noninfectious viral RNA. As noted by Merritt, "That is not epidemiology. That's fraud."
2. Cannot confirm that SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.
3. Have not been established for monitoring the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
4. Have exceptionally high false result rates--The higher the cycle threshold (CT)--i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles--the greater the chance of a false positive.
While any CT over 35 is deemed scientifically unjustifiable, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend running PCR tests at a CT of 40. [2][3][4][5]
Drosten tests and tests recommended by the World Health Organization are set to a CT of 45. These excessively high CTs guarantee the appearance of widespread (pandemic) infection when infection rates are in fact low.
THE CYCLE THRESHOLD IS THE KEY TO THE PANDEMIC
Many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many times, which results in healthy people testing "positive" for SARS-CoV-2 infection and being ordered to take off work and self-isolate for two weeks.
To optimize accuracy and avoid imposing unnecessary hardship on healthy people, PCR tests must be run at far fewer cycles than the 40 to 45 CTs currently recommended.
Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero.
An April 2020 study in the European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases showed that to get 100% confirmed real positives, the PCR test must be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically. [6]
By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy rate is a mere 20%, meaning 80% are false positives. Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero, as illustrated in the following graph from that study. [7]
By running PCR tests at 40 to 45 amplification cycles, you end up with the false appearance of an outbreak, and this grossly flawed testing scheme is what government leaders are basing their mask mandates and lockdown orders on.
Percentage of positive viral culture of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive nasopharyngeal samples from Covid-19 patients, according to Ct value (plain line). The dashed curve indicates the polynomial regression curve.
SCIENTIFIC REVIEW CONFIRMS PCR FLAWS
More recently, a December 3, 2020, systematic review published in the journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases assessed the findings of 29 different studies--all of which were published in 2020--comparing evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection with the CTs used in testing. They also looked at the timing of the test, and how symptom severity relates to PCR test results. [8] As reported by the authors:
"The data suggest a relationship between the time from onset of symptom to the timing of the specimen test, cycle threshold (CT) and symptom severity. Twelve studies reported that CT values were significantly lower and log copies higher in specimens producing live virus culture.
"Two studies reported the odds of live virus culture reduced by approximately 33% for every one unit increase in CT. Six of eight studies reported detectable RNA for longer than 14 days but infectious potential declined after day 8 even among cases with ongoing high viral loads..."
In other words, if you have symptoms of COVID-19, by Day 8 from the onset of symptoms, the chances of you spreading it to others starts to decline, and in the days following, you are unlikely to be infectious even if you still test positive. This is particularly true if the PCR test is using a higher than ideal CT. [9] As noted by the authors:
"Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR. Prospective routine testing of reference and culture specimens and their relationship to symptoms, signs and patient co-factors should be used to define the reliability of PCR for assessing infectious potential. Those with high cycle threshold are unlikely to have infectious potential."
LIVE VIRUS UNLIKELY IN TESTS USING CT ABOVE 24
According to The New York Times, researchers have been "unable to grow the coronavirus out of samples from volunteers whose PCR tests had CT values above 27," and if the virus cannot replicate, you will not get ill and are not infectious, so you cannot spread it to others. [10]
The Clinical Infectious Diseases review confirms this. Under the heading "The Relationship Between RT-PCR Results and Viral Culture of SARS-CoV-2," they point out that "significantly lower" CTs were used in studies that correctly identified infectious patients. [11][12]
Five of the studies included were unable to identify any live viruses in cases where a positive PCR test had used a CT above 24. What's more, in order to produce live virus culture, a patient whose PCR test used a CT at or above 35 had to be symptomatic.
So, to clarify, if you have symptoms of COVID-19 and test positive using a PCR test that was run at 35 amplification cycles or higher, then you are likely to be infected and infectious.
However, if you do not have symptoms, yet test positive using a PCR test run at 35 CTs or higher, then it is likely a false positive and you pose no risk to others as you're unlikely to carry any live virus. In fact, provided you're asymptomatic, you're unlikely to be infectious even if you test positive with a test run at 24 CTs or higher.
TIMING OF PCR TEST ALSO MATTERS
The Clinical Infectious Diseases review also confirmed that the timing of the test matters. [13] According to the authors:
"...there appears to be a time window during which RNA detection is at its highest with low cycle threshold and higher possibility of culturing a live virus, with viral load and probability of growing live virus of SARS-CoV2... We propose that further work should be done on this with the aim of constructing an algorithm for integrating the results of PCR with other variables, to increase the effectiveness of detecting infectious patients."
Another scientific review that looked into how the timing of the test influences results and your risk of being infectious was posted on the preprint server medRxiv September 29, 2020. Fourteen studies were included in this review. [14][15]
The data show that your chances of getting a true positive on the first day of COVID-19 symptom onset is only about 40%. Not until Day 3 from symptom onset do you have an 80% chance of getting an accurate PCR result.
By Day 5 the accuracy shrinks considerably and by Day 8 the accuracy is nil. Now, these are symptomatic people. When you're asymptomatic, your odds of a positive PCR test being accurate is virtually nonexistent.
The graph below, from one of the studies included in the review (Bullard et. al.), illustrates the probability of a patient being infectious (having live virus) based on the CT used and the timing of the test. [16][17] As explained by the review authors:
"The figure... shows how the probability of SARS-CoV-2 infectious virus is greater (the red bars) when the cycle threshold is lower (the blue line) and when symptoms to test time is shorter--beyond 8 days, no live virus was detected."
FLORIDA TO REQUIRE DISCLOSURE OF CT DATA
Even though health authorities know that high CTs result in high rates of false positives, they do not specify the CT used for the PCR tests they're reporting. Fortunately, that's about to change in Florida, which just became the first state to require all labs in the state to report the CT used for their PCR tests. [18]
The Florida Health Department issued the order December 3, 2020, and labs must comply with the new mandatory reporting rule within seven days. [19]
This could prove quite interesting, especially if the state health department decides to invalidate positive results obtained from tests run above a certain amplification threshold. Time will tell exactly how this reporting requirement might influence pandemic response measures such as mask mandates and lockdowns.
PORTUGAL RULES QUARANTINE BASED ON PCR RESULTS IS UNLAWFUL
In related news, an appeals court in Portugal recently ruled that the PCR test is "not a reliable test for SARS-CoV-2" and that "a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection." Therefore, "any enforced quarantine based on the results is unlawful." [20][21][22]
The court also noted that forcing healthy people to self-isolate could be a violation of their fundamental right to liberty. The case was brought by four German tourists who had been forced to self-quarantine after one of them tested positive.
Several scientific studies were brought forth as evidence in this case, including a September 28, 2020, study in Clinical Infectious Diseases, which found that when you run a PCR test at a CT of 35 or higher, the accuracy drops to 3%, resulting in a 97% false positive rate. The court ruled that, based on the science presented, any PCR test using a CT over is unreliable. [23][25]
FATAL ERRORS FOUND IN PAPER ON WHICH PCR TESTING IS BASED
The Portuguese appeals court is not alone in its critique of the PCR test being used as the sole criteria for quarantine. November 30, 2020, the scientific paper describing the work flow of how to use the PCR test to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection--which was quickly accepted as the standard by the WHO and applied across the world--was challenged by 22 international scientists who demand that the paper be retracted due to "fatal errors." [24][25][26]
The paper in question was written by Christian Drosten, Ph.D., a German virologist, and Victor Corman, who heads a German working group on virus diagnostics and clinical virology. According to Reiner Fuellmich, founding member of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss, or ACU), Drosten is a key culprit in the COVID-19 pandemic hoax. [27][28][29][30]
One of the key "fatal errors" in the Corman-Drosten paper is that they wrote it--and developed the PCR test--before there was any viral isolate available. All they used was the genetic sequence published online by Chinese scientists in January 2020.
Interestingly, the supposedly peer-reviewed] paper was published a mere 24 hours after it was submitted, which suggests that it actually wasn't peer-reviewed before being embraced by the whole world. How could it have been in such a short time? Undercover DC interviewed Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of the 22 scientists who are now demanding the paper's retraction, who stated: [31]
"Every scientific rationale for the development of that test has been totally destroyed by this paper. It's like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the COVID test.
"When Drosten developed the test, China hadn't given them a viral isolate. They developed the test from a sequence in a gene bank. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. They had a code, but no body for the code. No viral morphology.
"In the fish market, it's like giving you a few bones and saying 'that's your fish.' It could be any fish... Listen, the Corman-Drosten paper, there's nothing from a patient in it. It's all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren't there they made up.
"They synthetically created them to fill in the blanks. That's what genetics is; it's a code. So, its ABBBCCDDD and you're missing some, what you think is EEE, so you put it in... This is basically a computer virus.
"There are 10 fatal errors in this Drosten test paper... But here is the bottom line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they were doing. The PCR products of the amplification didn't correspond to any viral isolate at that time. I call it 'donut ring science.' There is nothing at the center of it. It's all about code, genetics, nothing to do with reality...
"There have since been papers saying they've produced viral isolates. But there are no controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July... where they said: 'Here's the viral isolate.' Do you know what they did? They swabbed one person. One person, who'd been to China and had cold symptoms. One person. And they assumed he had [COVID-19] to begin with. So, it's all full of holes, the whole thing."
NO VIABLE VIRUS FOUND IN POSITIVE CASES
The critique against PCR testing is further strengthened by a November 20, 2020, study in Nature Communications, which found no viable virus in PCR-positive cases. The study evaluated data from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan, China, who had undergone PCR testing between May 14 and June 1, 2020. [32]
A total of 300 tested positive but had no symptoms. Of the 34,424 people with a history of COVID-19, 107 tested positive a second time. Yet when they did virus cultures on these 407 individuals who had tested positive (either for the first or second time), no live virus was ever found.
EXPOSE THE FRAUD AND END THE MISERY
A number of experts have now come forward, calling out the COVID-19 pandemic as a cruel hoax perpetuated by fatally flawed testing. Aside from this testing data, there's no evidence of a lethal pandemic at all. While there is such a thing as COVID-19, and people have and do die from it, there are no excess deaths due to it. [33[34][35]
In other words, the total Mortality Rate for 2020 is basically normal, not significantly different than it has been over the past decade, in fact, especially when you consider things like population increases. The pandemic has not killed more people than would die in any given year--from something, anything--anyway. So, unless we think we should shut down the world and stop living because people die from heart disease, diabetes, cancer, the flu or anything else, then there's no reason to shut down the world because some people happen to die from COVID-19. [39]
The good news is the hoax is starting to be exposed, and will continue to be exposed as more cases are brought before the courts of the world. As for what you can do, consider:
- Turning off mainstream media news, and turning instead to independent experts. Do the research. Read through the science.
- Continue to counter the censorship by asking questions--The more questions are asked, the more answers will come to light. Arm yourself with mortality statistics and the facts on PCR testing, so you can explain how and why this pandemic simply isn't really a grave one that justifies the sort of Draconian "counter-measures" that are currently being implemented.
- If you are a medical professional, especially if you're a member of a professional society, write an open letter to your government, urging them to speak to and heed recommendations from independent experts. Sign The Great Barrington Declaration, which calls for an end to lockdowns. [36]
REFERENCES
1. https://www.ddponline.org/
2. https://tinyurl.com/yc67yo8e
3. https://tinyurl.com/y494kz2v
4. https://youtu.be/a_Vy6fgaBPE?t=260
5. https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
6, 7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10096-020-03913-9
7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13. https://tinyurl.com/yyyjun95
14, 17. https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/infectious-positive-pcr-test-result-covid-19/
15. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.04.20167932v4
16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32442256/
18. https://tinyurl.com/yc3w3jvk
19. https://tinyurl.com/y56ht8wn
20. https://tinyurl.com/yynsvyw4
21. https://tinyurl.com/yxhxywrb
22. https://tinyurl.com/y46uybaq
23. https://tinyurl.com/yxs6d4gl
24. https://tinyurl.com/rrepus7
25. https://cormandrostenreview.com/
26, 31. https://tinyurl.com/y4xgsck8
27. https://www.fuellmich.com/dr-reiner-fuellmich/
28. https://acu2020.org/
29. https://acu2020.org/english-versions/
30. https://tinyurl.com/yd3cpqpg
32. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
33. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjYvitCeMPc
34. https://tinyurl.com/y9fcl2gl
35. https://tinyurl.com/yyryvj9x
36. https://gbdeclaration.org/
37. https://tinyurl.com/y73j4ruu
38. https://tinyurl.com/yymmcdfr
39. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/provisional-tables.htm
#Medicine #COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #WHO #Society #Freedom #Pandemics #Epidemiology #PCRTests #PCRTesting #Medicine #Virology #COVIDTruth #ScientificFraud
Positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests have been used as the justification for keeping large portions of the world locked down since March, 2020. Not reliable hospitalization or death rates; just positive PCR test numbers--a large portion of which are from people who have no symptoms of actual illness--are the triggers behind the shutdowns.
Experts are now coming forward in growing numbers denouncing mass PCR testing as foolhardy and nonsensical, if not outright criminal. Why? Because we're now finding that PCR tests rarely tell us anything truly useful, at least not when they're used as they have been so far.
You know that when the Globalist-controlled propaganda outlets like the Toilet Paper of Record, the New York Times is forced to admit that 90% of all "positive" COVID-19 tests are actually false positives, and that it's a waste of time to test asymptomatic people anyway, the gig is up. [38]
We now know that PCR tests:
1. Cannot distinguish between "live" viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles and therefore cannot be used as a diagnostic tool--For this reason, it is grossly misleading to refer to a positive test as a "COVID-19 case."
As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness lecture, featured in "How Medical Technocracy Made the PLANdemic Possible," media and public health officials appear to have purposefully conflated "cases" or positive tests with the actual illness. [1]
Medically speaking, a "case" refers to a sick person. It never ever referred to someone who had no symptoms of illness. Now all of a sudden, this well-established medical term, "case," has been arbitrarily redefined to mean someone who tested positive for the presence of noninfectious viral RNA. As noted by Merritt, "That is not epidemiology. That's fraud."
2. Cannot confirm that SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.
3. Have not been established for monitoring the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
4. Have exceptionally high false result rates--The higher the cycle threshold (CT)--i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles--the greater the chance of a false positive.
While any CT over 35 is deemed scientifically unjustifiable, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend running PCR tests at a CT of 40. [2][3][4][5]
Drosten tests and tests recommended by the World Health Organization are set to a CT of 45. These excessively high CTs guarantee the appearance of widespread (pandemic) infection when infection rates are in fact low.
THE CYCLE THRESHOLD IS THE KEY TO THE PANDEMIC
Many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many times, which results in healthy people testing "positive" for SARS-CoV-2 infection and being ordered to take off work and self-isolate for two weeks.
To optimize accuracy and avoid imposing unnecessary hardship on healthy people, PCR tests must be run at far fewer cycles than the 40 to 45 CTs currently recommended.
Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero.
An April 2020 study in the European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases showed that to get 100% confirmed real positives, the PCR test must be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically. [6]
By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy rate is a mere 20%, meaning 80% are false positives. Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero, as illustrated in the following graph from that study. [7]
By running PCR tests at 40 to 45 amplification cycles, you end up with the false appearance of an outbreak, and this grossly flawed testing scheme is what government leaders are basing their mask mandates and lockdown orders on.
Percentage of positive viral culture of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive nasopharyngeal samples from Covid-19 patients, according to Ct value (plain line). The dashed curve indicates the polynomial regression curve.
SCIENTIFIC REVIEW CONFIRMS PCR FLAWS
More recently, a December 3, 2020, systematic review published in the journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases assessed the findings of 29 different studies--all of which were published in 2020--comparing evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection with the CTs used in testing. They also looked at the timing of the test, and how symptom severity relates to PCR test results. [8] As reported by the authors:
"The data suggest a relationship between the time from onset of symptom to the timing of the specimen test, cycle threshold (CT) and symptom severity. Twelve studies reported that CT values were significantly lower and log copies higher in specimens producing live virus culture.
"Two studies reported the odds of live virus culture reduced by approximately 33% for every one unit increase in CT. Six of eight studies reported detectable RNA for longer than 14 days but infectious potential declined after day 8 even among cases with ongoing high viral loads..."
In other words, if you have symptoms of COVID-19, by Day 8 from the onset of symptoms, the chances of you spreading it to others starts to decline, and in the days following, you are unlikely to be infectious even if you still test positive. This is particularly true if the PCR test is using a higher than ideal CT. [9] As noted by the authors:
"Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR. Prospective routine testing of reference and culture specimens and their relationship to symptoms, signs and patient co-factors should be used to define the reliability of PCR for assessing infectious potential. Those with high cycle threshold are unlikely to have infectious potential."
LIVE VIRUS UNLIKELY IN TESTS USING CT ABOVE 24
According to The New York Times, researchers have been "unable to grow the coronavirus out of samples from volunteers whose PCR tests had CT values above 27," and if the virus cannot replicate, you will not get ill and are not infectious, so you cannot spread it to others. [10]
The Clinical Infectious Diseases review confirms this. Under the heading "The Relationship Between RT-PCR Results and Viral Culture of SARS-CoV-2," they point out that "significantly lower" CTs were used in studies that correctly identified infectious patients. [11][12]
Five of the studies included were unable to identify any live viruses in cases where a positive PCR test had used a CT above 24. What's more, in order to produce live virus culture, a patient whose PCR test used a CT at or above 35 had to be symptomatic.
So, to clarify, if you have symptoms of COVID-19 and test positive using a PCR test that was run at 35 amplification cycles or higher, then you are likely to be infected and infectious.
However, if you do not have symptoms, yet test positive using a PCR test run at 35 CTs or higher, then it is likely a false positive and you pose no risk to others as you're unlikely to carry any live virus. In fact, provided you're asymptomatic, you're unlikely to be infectious even if you test positive with a test run at 24 CTs or higher.
TIMING OF PCR TEST ALSO MATTERS
The Clinical Infectious Diseases review also confirmed that the timing of the test matters. [13] According to the authors:
"...there appears to be a time window during which RNA detection is at its highest with low cycle threshold and higher possibility of culturing a live virus, with viral load and probability of growing live virus of SARS-CoV2... We propose that further work should be done on this with the aim of constructing an algorithm for integrating the results of PCR with other variables, to increase the effectiveness of detecting infectious patients."
Another scientific review that looked into how the timing of the test influences results and your risk of being infectious was posted on the preprint server medRxiv September 29, 2020. Fourteen studies were included in this review. [14][15]
The data show that your chances of getting a true positive on the first day of COVID-19 symptom onset is only about 40%. Not until Day 3 from symptom onset do you have an 80% chance of getting an accurate PCR result.
By Day 5 the accuracy shrinks considerably and by Day 8 the accuracy is nil. Now, these are symptomatic people. When you're asymptomatic, your odds of a positive PCR test being accurate is virtually nonexistent.
The graph below, from one of the studies included in the review (Bullard et. al.), illustrates the probability of a patient being infectious (having live virus) based on the CT used and the timing of the test. [16][17] As explained by the review authors:
"The figure... shows how the probability of SARS-CoV-2 infectious virus is greater (the red bars) when the cycle threshold is lower (the blue line) and when symptoms to test time is shorter--beyond 8 days, no live virus was detected."
FLORIDA TO REQUIRE DISCLOSURE OF CT DATA
Even though health authorities know that high CTs result in high rates of false positives, they do not specify the CT used for the PCR tests they're reporting. Fortunately, that's about to change in Florida, which just became the first state to require all labs in the state to report the CT used for their PCR tests. [18]
The Florida Health Department issued the order December 3, 2020, and labs must comply with the new mandatory reporting rule within seven days. [19]
This could prove quite interesting, especially if the state health department decides to invalidate positive results obtained from tests run above a certain amplification threshold. Time will tell exactly how this reporting requirement might influence pandemic response measures such as mask mandates and lockdowns.
PORTUGAL RULES QUARANTINE BASED ON PCR RESULTS IS UNLAWFUL
In related news, an appeals court in Portugal recently ruled that the PCR test is "not a reliable test for SARS-CoV-2" and that "a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection." Therefore, "any enforced quarantine based on the results is unlawful." [20][21][22]
The court also noted that forcing healthy people to self-isolate could be a violation of their fundamental right to liberty. The case was brought by four German tourists who had been forced to self-quarantine after one of them tested positive.
Several scientific studies were brought forth as evidence in this case, including a September 28, 2020, study in Clinical Infectious Diseases, which found that when you run a PCR test at a CT of 35 or higher, the accuracy drops to 3%, resulting in a 97% false positive rate. The court ruled that, based on the science presented, any PCR test using a CT over is unreliable. [23][25]
FATAL ERRORS FOUND IN PAPER ON WHICH PCR TESTING IS BASED
The Portuguese appeals court is not alone in its critique of the PCR test being used as the sole criteria for quarantine. November 30, 2020, the scientific paper describing the work flow of how to use the PCR test to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection--which was quickly accepted as the standard by the WHO and applied across the world--was challenged by 22 international scientists who demand that the paper be retracted due to "fatal errors." [24][25][26]
The paper in question was written by Christian Drosten, Ph.D., a German virologist, and Victor Corman, who heads a German working group on virus diagnostics and clinical virology. According to Reiner Fuellmich, founding member of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss, or ACU), Drosten is a key culprit in the COVID-19 pandemic hoax. [27][28][29][30]
One of the key "fatal errors" in the Corman-Drosten paper is that they wrote it--and developed the PCR test--before there was any viral isolate available. All they used was the genetic sequence published online by Chinese scientists in January 2020.
Interestingly, the supposedly peer-reviewed] paper was published a mere 24 hours after it was submitted, which suggests that it actually wasn't peer-reviewed before being embraced by the whole world. How could it have been in such a short time? Undercover DC interviewed Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of the 22 scientists who are now demanding the paper's retraction, who stated: [31]
"Every scientific rationale for the development of that test has been totally destroyed by this paper. It's like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the COVID test.
"When Drosten developed the test, China hadn't given them a viral isolate. They developed the test from a sequence in a gene bank. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. They had a code, but no body for the code. No viral morphology.
"In the fish market, it's like giving you a few bones and saying 'that's your fish.' It could be any fish... Listen, the Corman-Drosten paper, there's nothing from a patient in it. It's all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren't there they made up.
"They synthetically created them to fill in the blanks. That's what genetics is; it's a code. So, its ABBBCCDDD and you're missing some, what you think is EEE, so you put it in... This is basically a computer virus.
"There are 10 fatal errors in this Drosten test paper... But here is the bottom line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they were doing. The PCR products of the amplification didn't correspond to any viral isolate at that time. I call it 'donut ring science.' There is nothing at the center of it. It's all about code, genetics, nothing to do with reality...
"There have since been papers saying they've produced viral isolates. But there are no controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July... where they said: 'Here's the viral isolate.' Do you know what they did? They swabbed one person. One person, who'd been to China and had cold symptoms. One person. And they assumed he had [COVID-19] to begin with. So, it's all full of holes, the whole thing."
NO VIABLE VIRUS FOUND IN POSITIVE CASES
The critique against PCR testing is further strengthened by a November 20, 2020, study in Nature Communications, which found no viable virus in PCR-positive cases. The study evaluated data from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan, China, who had undergone PCR testing between May 14 and June 1, 2020. [32]
A total of 300 tested positive but had no symptoms. Of the 34,424 people with a history of COVID-19, 107 tested positive a second time. Yet when they did virus cultures on these 407 individuals who had tested positive (either for the first or second time), no live virus was ever found.
EXPOSE THE FRAUD AND END THE MISERY
A number of experts have now come forward, calling out the COVID-19 pandemic as a cruel hoax perpetuated by fatally flawed testing. Aside from this testing data, there's no evidence of a lethal pandemic at all. While there is such a thing as COVID-19, and people have and do die from it, there are no excess deaths due to it. [33[34][35]
In other words, the total Mortality Rate for 2020 is basically normal, not significantly different than it has been over the past decade, in fact, especially when you consider things like population increases. The pandemic has not killed more people than would die in any given year--from something, anything--anyway. So, unless we think we should shut down the world and stop living because people die from heart disease, diabetes, cancer, the flu or anything else, then there's no reason to shut down the world because some people happen to die from COVID-19. [39]
The good news is the hoax is starting to be exposed, and will continue to be exposed as more cases are brought before the courts of the world. As for what you can do, consider:
- Turning off mainstream media news, and turning instead to independent experts. Do the research. Read through the science.
- Continue to counter the censorship by asking questions--The more questions are asked, the more answers will come to light. Arm yourself with mortality statistics and the facts on PCR testing, so you can explain how and why this pandemic simply isn't really a grave one that justifies the sort of Draconian "counter-measures" that are currently being implemented.
- If you are a medical professional, especially if you're a member of a professional society, write an open letter to your government, urging them to speak to and heed recommendations from independent experts. Sign The Great Barrington Declaration, which calls for an end to lockdowns. [36]
REFERENCES
1. https://www.ddponline.org/
2. https://tinyurl.com/yc67yo8e
3. https://tinyurl.com/y494kz2v
4. https://youtu.be/a_Vy6fgaBPE?t=260
5. https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
6, 7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10096-020-03913-9
7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13. https://tinyurl.com/yyyjun95
14, 17. https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/infectious-positive-pcr-test-result-covid-19/
15. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.04.20167932v4
16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32442256/
18. https://tinyurl.com/yc3w3jvk
19. https://tinyurl.com/y56ht8wn
20. https://tinyurl.com/yynsvyw4
21. https://tinyurl.com/yxhxywrb
22. https://tinyurl.com/y46uybaq
23. https://tinyurl.com/yxs6d4gl
24. https://tinyurl.com/rrepus7
25. https://cormandrostenreview.com/
26, 31. https://tinyurl.com/y4xgsck8
27. https://www.fuellmich.com/dr-reiner-fuellmich/
28. https://acu2020.org/
29. https://acu2020.org/english-versions/
30. https://tinyurl.com/yd3cpqpg
32. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
33. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjYvitCeMPc
34. https://tinyurl.com/y9fcl2gl
35. https://tinyurl.com/yyryvj9x
36. https://gbdeclaration.org/
37. https://tinyurl.com/y73j4ruu
38. https://tinyurl.com/yymmcdfr
39. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/provisional-tables.htm
#Medicine #COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #WHO #Society #Freedom #Pandemics #Epidemiology #PCRTests #PCRTesting #Medicine #Virology #COVIDTruth #ScientificFraud
As I've been telling everyone for over 10 months now, neither the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), nor any of its sub-agencies such as the NIH or the CDC, nor ANYONE ELSE in the world has EVER actually isolated (disaggregated) the SARS-CoV-2 virus in a laboratory from a tissue sample taken from ANY COVID-19 patient anywhere in the world. Nor has China ever provided anyone in the world with an physical sample of the SARS-CoV-2, or even a [complete] genome of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is the name of the [alleged] virus which the Communist Chinese/Bill Gates-controlled World Health Organization (WHO) says causes the disease that they named "COVID-19." [1]
That's right, folks. Notwithstanding the fact that millions of people are said to be infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and notwithstanding the fact that more than 200,000 Americans are alleged to have died from this virus, our so-called "health authorities" here in the U.S. and Canada, nor anyone else in the world, have never even bothered to take a biological sample from ANY COVID-19 patient in order to confirm the existence of that virus in that patient, or any other COVID-19 patient, in any scientifically-verifiable way
Let that sink in for a moment.
Wouldn't you think that would be necessary to develop reliable diagnostic tests and vaccines for any novel (new) pandemic level virus, especially for a virus that said "health authorities" are claiming is so deadly to humanity that it necessitates completely overturning civilization and redesigning it, coincidentally, into the shape the ruling elite have been actively planning to for over 10 years now, all in order to protect ourselves from that virus. [2] Of course, you would. Then, I ask, why is it that they have not done so already? After all, the NIH calls modern cell culture diagnosis "the gold standard" for the diagnosis of any virus. So, why on Earth not this one? [3]
Yet, these PCR Tests that are currently being used to diagnose patients with COVID-19, and the vaccines that are currently being developed at "warp speed," are all being manufactured based upon nothing but a computer-generated model of a virus.--a theoretical virus, not a "real" virus which has been properly isolated (scientifically proven to exist) in a laboratory, in accordance with NIH guidelines, so that its genome can be fully mapped, and physically examined under an electron microscope in order to confirm its true properties, and thereby be "quantified."
Not only that, folks. It gets worse.
The PCR tests that are currently being used are diagnosing people "positive" for COVID-19 whenever their tests match the genetic markers, which they have derived from their [theoretical] computer model of SARS-CoV-2. However, the problem with that is there are about 30,000 genes in a viral genome, and your average person on the street [without any SARS-CoV-2 infection, or any other viral infection] might match any number of these, or even all of the tiny subset of ONLY 37 markers that they are currently using in the PCR test to claim that people are positive for COVID-19. [4]
Don't just believe me, here's what a renowned physician, Dr. Tom Cowan has to tell you about this. He calls what's going on right now "scientific fraud." Indeed. Nope. It's actually worse than that. It's the Mother of All Frauds.
"This week, my colleague and friend Sally Fallon Morell brought to my attention an amazing article put out by the CDC. It was published in June, 2020. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.
"First, in the section titled Whole Genome Sequencing, we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, that the CDC 'designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512). [5]
"To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud.
"Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.
"The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by “consensus,” sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary “unicorn,” so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn." [6]
Footnotes
1. https://AlaskasList.com/freedom/open_letter.php
2. https://alaskaslist.com/extra/lock_step.php
3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850366/
4. https://www.nytimes.com/.../health/coronavirus-testing.html
5. http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article
6. https://tinyurl.com/4kw4htkp
#COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #Pandemics #Epidemiology #Science #Virology #Lockdowns #Quarantines #ScientificFraud #Health #Medicine #Flu #Fraud #Unicorns
That's right, folks. Notwithstanding the fact that millions of people are said to be infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and notwithstanding the fact that more than 200,000 Americans are alleged to have died from this virus, our so-called "health authorities" here in the U.S. and Canada, nor anyone else in the world, have never even bothered to take a biological sample from ANY COVID-19 patient in order to confirm the existence of that virus in that patient, or any other COVID-19 patient, in any scientifically-verifiable way
Let that sink in for a moment.
Wouldn't you think that would be necessary to develop reliable diagnostic tests and vaccines for any novel (new) pandemic level virus, especially for a virus that said "health authorities" are claiming is so deadly to humanity that it necessitates completely overturning civilization and redesigning it, coincidentally, into the shape the ruling elite have been actively planning to for over 10 years now, all in order to protect ourselves from that virus. [2] Of course, you would. Then, I ask, why is it that they have not done so already? After all, the NIH calls modern cell culture diagnosis "the gold standard" for the diagnosis of any virus. So, why on Earth not this one? [3]
Yet, these PCR Tests that are currently being used to diagnose patients with COVID-19, and the vaccines that are currently being developed at "warp speed," are all being manufactured based upon nothing but a computer-generated model of a virus.--a theoretical virus, not a "real" virus which has been properly isolated (scientifically proven to exist) in a laboratory, in accordance with NIH guidelines, so that its genome can be fully mapped, and physically examined under an electron microscope in order to confirm its true properties, and thereby be "quantified."
Not only that, folks. It gets worse.
The PCR tests that are currently being used are diagnosing people "positive" for COVID-19 whenever their tests match the genetic markers, which they have derived from their [theoretical] computer model of SARS-CoV-2. However, the problem with that is there are about 30,000 genes in a viral genome, and your average person on the street [without any SARS-CoV-2 infection, or any other viral infection] might match any number of these, or even all of the tiny subset of ONLY 37 markers that they are currently using in the PCR test to claim that people are positive for COVID-19. [4]
Don't just believe me, here's what a renowned physician, Dr. Tom Cowan has to tell you about this. He calls what's going on right now "scientific fraud." Indeed. Nope. It's actually worse than that. It's the Mother of All Frauds.
"This week, my colleague and friend Sally Fallon Morell brought to my attention an amazing article put out by the CDC. It was published in June, 2020. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.
"First, in the section titled Whole Genome Sequencing, we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, that the CDC 'designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512). [5]
"To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud.
"Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.
"The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by “consensus,” sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary “unicorn,” so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn." [6]
Footnotes
1. https://AlaskasList.com/freedom/open_letter.php
2. https://alaskaslist.com/extra/lock_step.php
3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850366/
4. https://www.nytimes.com/.../health/coronavirus-testing.html
5. http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article
6. https://tinyurl.com/4kw4htkp
#COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #Pandemics #Epidemiology #Science #Virology #Lockdowns #Quarantines #ScientificFraud #Health #Medicine #Flu #Fraud #Unicorns