Here you will see a screenshot of a Freedom of Information Act Request that was submitted to the Public Health Agency of Canada almost 6 months ago, requesting evidence that is absolutely essential (but not entirely sufficient on its own) for establishing the existence of the alleged "SARS-COV-2" virus.
Without this step having been performed (followed by controlled experiments), there is no way to claim scientifically that the alleged "novel coronavirus", (SARS-CoV-2), which is blamed for the disease diagnosis known as COVID-19, actually exists.
Without this step having been performed, and being followed by the necessary controlled experiments, all claims of this alleged virus are nothing but wild, unscientific, fraud-based speculation backed only by fraudulent science, fraudulent tests, and fraudulent RT-PCR diagnoses.
See all such requests...
https://tinyurl.com/ybw8ey8q
#Medicine #COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #WHO #Society #Freedom #Pandemics #Epidemiology #RT-PCRTests #RT-PCRTesting #Virology
Without this step having been performed (followed by controlled experiments), there is no way to claim scientifically that the alleged "novel coronavirus", (SARS-CoV-2), which is blamed for the disease diagnosis known as COVID-19, actually exists.
Without this step having been performed, and being followed by the necessary controlled experiments, all claims of this alleged virus are nothing but wild, unscientific, fraud-based speculation backed only by fraudulent science, fraudulent tests, and fraudulent RT-PCR diagnoses.
See all such requests...
https://tinyurl.com/ybw8ey8q
#Medicine #COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #WHO #Society #Freedom #Pandemics #Epidemiology #RT-PCRTests #RT-PCRTesting #Virology
Post
THE RT-PCR TESTS ARE ARE A HUGE FRAUD
Positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests have been used as the justification for keeping large portions of the world locked down since March, 2020. Not reliable hospitalization or death rates; just positive PCR test numbers--a large portion of which are from people who have no symptoms of actual illness--are the triggers behind the shutdowns.
Experts are now coming forward in growing numbers denouncing mass PCR testing as foolhardy and nonsensical, if not outright criminal. Why? Because we're now finding that PCR tests rarely tell us anything truly useful, at least not when they're used as they have been so far.
You know that when the Globalist-controlled propaganda outlets like the Toilet Paper of Record, the New York Times is forced to admit that 90% of all "positive" COVID-19 tests are actually false positives, and that it's a waste of time to test asymptomatic people anyway, the gig is up. [38]
We now know that PCR tests:
1. Cannot distinguish between "live" viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles and therefore cannot be used as a diagnostic tool--For this reason, it is grossly misleading to refer to a positive test as a "COVID-19 case."
As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness lecture, featured in "How Medical Technocracy Made the PLANdemic Possible," media and public health officials appear to have purposefully conflated "cases" or positive tests with the actual illness. [1]
Medically speaking, a "case" refers to a sick person. It never ever referred to someone who had no symptoms of illness. Now all of a sudden, this well-established medical term, "case," has been arbitrarily redefined to mean someone who tested positive for the presence of noninfectious viral RNA. As noted by Merritt, "That is not epidemiology. That's fraud."
2. Cannot confirm that SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.
3. Have not been established for monitoring the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
4. Have exceptionally high false result rates--The higher the cycle threshold (CT)--i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles--the greater the chance of a false positive.
While any CT over 35 is deemed scientifically unjustifiable, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend running PCR tests at a CT of 40. [2][3][4][5]
Drosten tests and tests recommended by the World Health Organization are set to a CT of 45. These excessively high CTs guarantee the appearance of widespread (pandemic) infection when infection rates are in fact low.
THE CYCLE THRESHOLD IS THE KEY TO THE PANDEMIC
Many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many times, which results in healthy people testing "positive" for SARS-CoV-2 infection and being ordered to take off work and self-isolate for two weeks.
To optimize accuracy and avoid imposing unnecessary hardship on healthy people, PCR tests must be run at far fewer cycles than the 40 to 45 CTs currently recommended.
Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero.
An April 2020 study in the European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases showed that to get 100% confirmed real positives, the PCR test must be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically. [6]
By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy rate is a mere 20%, meaning 80% are false positives. Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero, as illustrated in the following graph from that study. [7]
By running PCR tests at 40 to 45 amplification cycles, you end up with the false appearance of an outbreak, and this grossly flawed testing scheme is what government leaders are basing their mask mandates and lockdown orders on.
Percentage of positive viral culture of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive nasopharyngeal samples from Covid-19 patients, according to Ct value (plain line). The dashed curve indicates the polynomial regression curve.
SCIENTIFIC REVIEW CONFIRMS PCR FLAWS
More recently, a December 3, 2020, systematic review published in the journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases assessed the findings of 29 different studies--all of which were published in 2020--comparing evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection with the CTs used in testing. They also looked at the timing of the test, and how symptom severity relates to PCR test results. [8] As reported by the authors:
"The data suggest a relationship between the time from onset of symptom to the timing of the specimen test, cycle threshold (CT) and symptom severity. Twelve studies reported that CT values were significantly lower and log copies higher in specimens producing live virus culture.
"Two studies reported the odds of live virus culture reduced by approximately 33% for every one unit increase in CT. Six of eight studies reported detectable RNA for longer than 14 days but infectious potential declined after day 8 even among cases with ongoing high viral loads..."
In other words, if you have symptoms of COVID-19, by Day 8 from the onset of symptoms, the chances of you spreading it to others starts to decline, and in the days following, you are unlikely to be infectious even if you still test positive. This is particularly true if the PCR test is using a higher than ideal CT. [9] As noted by the authors:
"Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR. Prospective routine testing of reference and culture specimens and their relationship to symptoms, signs and patient co-factors should be used to define the reliability of PCR for assessing infectious potential. Those with high cycle threshold are unlikely to have infectious potential."
LIVE VIRUS UNLIKELY IN TESTS USING CT ABOVE 24
According to The New York Times, researchers have been "unable to grow the coronavirus out of samples from volunteers whose PCR tests had CT values above 27," and if the virus cannot replicate, you will not get ill and are not infectious, so you cannot spread it to others. [10]
The Clinical Infectious Diseases review confirms this. Under the heading "The Relationship Between RT-PCR Results and Viral Culture of SARS-CoV-2," they point out that "significantly lower" CTs were used in studies that correctly identified infectious patients. [11][12]
Five of the studies included were unable to identify any live viruses in cases where a positive PCR test had used a CT above 24. What's more, in order to produce live virus culture, a patient whose PCR test used a CT at or above 35 had to be symptomatic.
So, to clarify, if you have symptoms of COVID-19 and test positive using a PCR test that was run at 35 amplification cycles or higher, then you are likely to be infected and infectious.
However, if you do not have symptoms, yet test positive using a PCR test run at 35 CTs or higher, then it is likely a false positive and you pose no risk to others as you're unlikely to carry any live virus. In fact, provided you're asymptomatic, you're unlikely to be infectious even if you test positive with a test run at 24 CTs or higher.
TIMING OF PCR TEST ALSO MATTERS
The Clinical Infectious Diseases review also confirmed that the timing of the test matters. [13] According to the authors:
"...there appears to be a time window during which RNA detection is at its highest with low cycle threshold and higher possibility of culturing a live virus, with viral load and probability of growing live virus of SARS-CoV2... We propose that further work should be done on this with the aim of constructing an algorithm for integrating the results of PCR with other variables, to increase the effectiveness of detecting infectious patients."
Another scientific review that looked into how the timing of the test influences results and your risk of being infectious was posted on the preprint server medRxiv September 29, 2020. Fourteen studies were included in this review. [14][15]
The data show that your chances of getting a true positive on the first day of COVID-19 symptom onset is only about 40%. Not until Day 3 from symptom onset do you have an 80% chance of getting an accurate PCR result.
By Day 5 the accuracy shrinks considerably and by Day 8 the accuracy is nil. Now, these are symptomatic people. When you're asymptomatic, your odds of a positive PCR test being accurate is virtually nonexistent.
The graph below, from one of the studies included in the review (Bullard et. al.), illustrates the probability of a patient being infectious (having live virus) based on the CT used and the timing of the test. [16][17] As explained by the review authors:
"The figure... shows how the probability of SARS-CoV-2 infectious virus is greater (the red bars) when the cycle threshold is lower (the blue line) and when symptoms to test time is shorter--beyond 8 days, no live virus was detected."
FLORIDA TO REQUIRE DISCLOSURE OF CT DATA
Even though health authorities know that high CTs result in high rates of false positives, they do not specify the CT used for the PCR tests they're reporting. Fortunately, that's about to change in Florida, which just became the first state to require all labs in the state to report the CT used for their PCR tests. [18]
The Florida Health Department issued the order December 3, 2020, and labs must comply with the new mandatory reporting rule within seven days. [19]
This could prove quite interesting, especially if the state health department decides to invalidate positive results obtained from tests run above a certain amplification threshold. Time will tell exactly how this reporting requirement might influence pandemic response measures such as mask mandates and lockdowns.
PORTUGAL RULES QUARANTINE BASED ON PCR RESULTS IS UNLAWFUL
In related news, an appeals court in Portugal recently ruled that the PCR test is "not a reliable test for SARS-CoV-2" and that "a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection." Therefore, "any enforced quarantine based on the results is unlawful." [20][21][22]
The court also noted that forcing healthy people to self-isolate could be a violation of their fundamental right to liberty. The case was brought by four German tourists who had been forced to self-quarantine after one of them tested positive.
Several scientific studies were brought forth as evidence in this case, including a September 28, 2020, study in Clinical Infectious Diseases, which found that when you run a PCR test at a CT of 35 or higher, the accuracy drops to 3%, resulting in a 97% false positive rate. The court ruled that, based on the science presented, any PCR test using a CT over is unreliable. [23][25]
FATAL ERRORS FOUND IN PAPER ON WHICH PCR TESTING IS BASED
The Portuguese appeals court is not alone in its critique of the PCR test being used as the sole criteria for quarantine. November 30, 2020, the scientific paper describing the work flow of how to use the PCR test to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection--which was quickly accepted as the standard by the WHO and applied across the world--was challenged by 22 international scientists who demand that the paper be retracted due to "fatal errors." [24][25][26]
The paper in question was written by Christian Drosten, Ph.D., a German virologist, and Victor Corman, who heads a German working group on virus diagnostics and clinical virology. According to Reiner Fuellmich, founding member of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss, or ACU), Drosten is a key culprit in the COVID-19 pandemic hoax. [27][28][29][30]
One of the key "fatal errors" in the Corman-Drosten paper is that they wrote it--and developed the PCR test--before there was any viral isolate available. All they used was the genetic sequence published online by Chinese scientists in January 2020.
Interestingly, the supposedly peer-reviewed] paper was published a mere 24 hours after it was submitted, which suggests that it actually wasn't peer-reviewed before being embraced by the whole world. How could it have been in such a short time? Undercover DC interviewed Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of the 22 scientists who are now demanding the paper's retraction, who stated: [31]
"Every scientific rationale for the development of that test has been totally destroyed by this paper. It's like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the COVID test.
"When Drosten developed the test, China hadn't given them a viral isolate. They developed the test from a sequence in a gene bank. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. They had a code, but no body for the code. No viral morphology.
"In the fish market, it's like giving you a few bones and saying 'that's your fish.' It could be any fish... Listen, the Corman-Drosten paper, there's nothing from a patient in it. It's all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren't there they made up.
"They synthetically created them to fill in the blanks. That's what genetics is; it's a code. So, its ABBBCCDDD and you're missing some, what you think is EEE, so you put it in... This is basically a computer virus.
"There are 10 fatal errors in this Drosten test paper... But here is the bottom line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they were doing. The PCR products of the amplification didn't correspond to any viral isolate at that time. I call it 'donut ring science.' There is nothing at the center of it. It's all about code, genetics, nothing to do with reality...
"There have since been papers saying they've produced viral isolates. But there are no controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July... where they said: 'Here's the viral isolate.' Do you know what they did? They swabbed one person. One person, who'd been to China and had cold symptoms. One person. And they assumed he had [COVID-19] to begin with. So, it's all full of holes, the whole thing."
NO VIABLE VIRUS FOUND IN POSITIVE CASES
The critique against PCR testing is further strengthened by a November 20, 2020, study in Nature Communications, which found no viable virus in PCR-positive cases. The study evaluated data from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan, China, who had undergone PCR testing between May 14 and June 1, 2020. [32]
A total of 300 tested positive but had no symptoms. Of the 34,424 people with a history of COVID-19, 107 tested positive a second time. Yet when they did virus cultures on these 407 individuals who had tested positive (either for the first or second time), no live virus was ever found.
EXPOSE THE FRAUD AND END THE MISERY
A number of experts have now come forward, calling out the COVID-19 pandemic as a cruel hoax perpetuated by fatally flawed testing. Aside from this testing data, there's no evidence of a lethal pandemic at all. While there is such a thing as COVID-19, and people have and do die from it, there are no excess deaths due to it. [33[34][35]
In other words, the total Mortality Rate for 2020 is basically normal, not significantly different than it has been over the past decade, in fact, especially when you consider things like population increases. The pandemic has not killed more people than would die in any given year--from something, anything--anyway. So, unless we think we should shut down the world and stop living because people die from heart disease, diabetes, cancer, the flu or anything else, then there's no reason to shut down the world because some people happen to die from COVID-19. [39]
The good news is the hoax is starting to be exposed, and will continue to be exposed as more cases are brought before the courts of the world. As for what you can do, consider:
- Turning off mainstream media news, and turning instead to independent experts. Do the research. Read through the science.
- Continue to counter the censorship by asking questions--The more questions are asked, the more answers will come to light. Arm yourself with mortality statistics and the facts on PCR testing, so you can explain how and why this pandemic simply isn't really a grave one that justifies the sort of Draconian "counter-measures" that are currently being implemented.
- If you are a medical professional, especially if you're a member of a professional society, write an open letter to your government, urging them to speak to and heed recommendations from independent experts. Sign The Great Barrington Declaration, which calls for an end to lockdowns. [36]
REFERENCES
1. https://www.ddponline.org/
2. https://tinyurl.com/yc67yo8e
3. https://tinyurl.com/y494kz2v
4. https://youtu.be/a_Vy6fgaBPE?t=260
5. https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
6, 7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10096-020-03913-9
7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13. https://tinyurl.com/yyyjun95
14, 17. https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/infectious-positive-pcr-test-result-covid-19/
15. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.04.20167932v4
16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32442256/
18. https://tinyurl.com/yc3w3jvk
19. https://tinyurl.com/y56ht8wn
20. https://tinyurl.com/yynsvyw4
21. https://tinyurl.com/yxhxywrb
22. https://tinyurl.com/y46uybaq
23. https://tinyurl.com/yxs6d4gl
24. https://tinyurl.com/rrepus7
25. https://cormandrostenreview.com/
26, 31. https://tinyurl.com/y4xgsck8
27. https://www.fuellmich.com/dr-reiner-fuellmich/
28. https://acu2020.org/
29. https://acu2020.org/english-versions/
30. https://tinyurl.com/yd3cpqpg
32. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
33. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjYvitCeMPc
34. https://tinyurl.com/y9fcl2gl
35. https://tinyurl.com/yyryvj9x
36. https://gbdeclaration.org/
37. https://tinyurl.com/y73j4ruu
38. https://tinyurl.com/yymmcdfr
39. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/provisional-tables.htm
#Medicine #COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #WHO #Society #Freedom #Pandemics #Epidemiology #PCRTests #PCRTesting #Medicine #Virology #COVIDTruth #ScientificFraud
Positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests have been used as the justification for keeping large portions of the world locked down since March, 2020. Not reliable hospitalization or death rates; just positive PCR test numbers--a large portion of which are from people who have no symptoms of actual illness--are the triggers behind the shutdowns.
Experts are now coming forward in growing numbers denouncing mass PCR testing as foolhardy and nonsensical, if not outright criminal. Why? Because we're now finding that PCR tests rarely tell us anything truly useful, at least not when they're used as they have been so far.
You know that when the Globalist-controlled propaganda outlets like the Toilet Paper of Record, the New York Times is forced to admit that 90% of all "positive" COVID-19 tests are actually false positives, and that it's a waste of time to test asymptomatic people anyway, the gig is up. [38]
We now know that PCR tests:
1. Cannot distinguish between "live" viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles and therefore cannot be used as a diagnostic tool--For this reason, it is grossly misleading to refer to a positive test as a "COVID-19 case."
As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness lecture, featured in "How Medical Technocracy Made the PLANdemic Possible," media and public health officials appear to have purposefully conflated "cases" or positive tests with the actual illness. [1]
Medically speaking, a "case" refers to a sick person. It never ever referred to someone who had no symptoms of illness. Now all of a sudden, this well-established medical term, "case," has been arbitrarily redefined to mean someone who tested positive for the presence of noninfectious viral RNA. As noted by Merritt, "That is not epidemiology. That's fraud."
2. Cannot confirm that SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.
3. Have not been established for monitoring the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
4. Have exceptionally high false result rates--The higher the cycle threshold (CT)--i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles--the greater the chance of a false positive.
While any CT over 35 is deemed scientifically unjustifiable, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend running PCR tests at a CT of 40. [2][3][4][5]
Drosten tests and tests recommended by the World Health Organization are set to a CT of 45. These excessively high CTs guarantee the appearance of widespread (pandemic) infection when infection rates are in fact low.
THE CYCLE THRESHOLD IS THE KEY TO THE PANDEMIC
Many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many times, which results in healthy people testing "positive" for SARS-CoV-2 infection and being ordered to take off work and self-isolate for two weeks.
To optimize accuracy and avoid imposing unnecessary hardship on healthy people, PCR tests must be run at far fewer cycles than the 40 to 45 CTs currently recommended.
Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero.
An April 2020 study in the European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases showed that to get 100% confirmed real positives, the PCR test must be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically. [6]
By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy rate is a mere 20%, meaning 80% are false positives. Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero, as illustrated in the following graph from that study. [7]
By running PCR tests at 40 to 45 amplification cycles, you end up with the false appearance of an outbreak, and this grossly flawed testing scheme is what government leaders are basing their mask mandates and lockdown orders on.
Percentage of positive viral culture of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive nasopharyngeal samples from Covid-19 patients, according to Ct value (plain line). The dashed curve indicates the polynomial regression curve.
SCIENTIFIC REVIEW CONFIRMS PCR FLAWS
More recently, a December 3, 2020, systematic review published in the journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases assessed the findings of 29 different studies--all of which were published in 2020--comparing evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection with the CTs used in testing. They also looked at the timing of the test, and how symptom severity relates to PCR test results. [8] As reported by the authors:
"The data suggest a relationship between the time from onset of symptom to the timing of the specimen test, cycle threshold (CT) and symptom severity. Twelve studies reported that CT values were significantly lower and log copies higher in specimens producing live virus culture.
"Two studies reported the odds of live virus culture reduced by approximately 33% for every one unit increase in CT. Six of eight studies reported detectable RNA for longer than 14 days but infectious potential declined after day 8 even among cases with ongoing high viral loads..."
In other words, if you have symptoms of COVID-19, by Day 8 from the onset of symptoms, the chances of you spreading it to others starts to decline, and in the days following, you are unlikely to be infectious even if you still test positive. This is particularly true if the PCR test is using a higher than ideal CT. [9] As noted by the authors:
"Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR. Prospective routine testing of reference and culture specimens and their relationship to symptoms, signs and patient co-factors should be used to define the reliability of PCR for assessing infectious potential. Those with high cycle threshold are unlikely to have infectious potential."
LIVE VIRUS UNLIKELY IN TESTS USING CT ABOVE 24
According to The New York Times, researchers have been "unable to grow the coronavirus out of samples from volunteers whose PCR tests had CT values above 27," and if the virus cannot replicate, you will not get ill and are not infectious, so you cannot spread it to others. [10]
The Clinical Infectious Diseases review confirms this. Under the heading "The Relationship Between RT-PCR Results and Viral Culture of SARS-CoV-2," they point out that "significantly lower" CTs were used in studies that correctly identified infectious patients. [11][12]
Five of the studies included were unable to identify any live viruses in cases where a positive PCR test had used a CT above 24. What's more, in order to produce live virus culture, a patient whose PCR test used a CT at or above 35 had to be symptomatic.
So, to clarify, if you have symptoms of COVID-19 and test positive using a PCR test that was run at 35 amplification cycles or higher, then you are likely to be infected and infectious.
However, if you do not have symptoms, yet test positive using a PCR test run at 35 CTs or higher, then it is likely a false positive and you pose no risk to others as you're unlikely to carry any live virus. In fact, provided you're asymptomatic, you're unlikely to be infectious even if you test positive with a test run at 24 CTs or higher.
TIMING OF PCR TEST ALSO MATTERS
The Clinical Infectious Diseases review also confirmed that the timing of the test matters. [13] According to the authors:
"...there appears to be a time window during which RNA detection is at its highest with low cycle threshold and higher possibility of culturing a live virus, with viral load and probability of growing live virus of SARS-CoV2... We propose that further work should be done on this with the aim of constructing an algorithm for integrating the results of PCR with other variables, to increase the effectiveness of detecting infectious patients."
Another scientific review that looked into how the timing of the test influences results and your risk of being infectious was posted on the preprint server medRxiv September 29, 2020. Fourteen studies were included in this review. [14][15]
The data show that your chances of getting a true positive on the first day of COVID-19 symptom onset is only about 40%. Not until Day 3 from symptom onset do you have an 80% chance of getting an accurate PCR result.
By Day 5 the accuracy shrinks considerably and by Day 8 the accuracy is nil. Now, these are symptomatic people. When you're asymptomatic, your odds of a positive PCR test being accurate is virtually nonexistent.
The graph below, from one of the studies included in the review (Bullard et. al.), illustrates the probability of a patient being infectious (having live virus) based on the CT used and the timing of the test. [16][17] As explained by the review authors:
"The figure... shows how the probability of SARS-CoV-2 infectious virus is greater (the red bars) when the cycle threshold is lower (the blue line) and when symptoms to test time is shorter--beyond 8 days, no live virus was detected."
FLORIDA TO REQUIRE DISCLOSURE OF CT DATA
Even though health authorities know that high CTs result in high rates of false positives, they do not specify the CT used for the PCR tests they're reporting. Fortunately, that's about to change in Florida, which just became the first state to require all labs in the state to report the CT used for their PCR tests. [18]
The Florida Health Department issued the order December 3, 2020, and labs must comply with the new mandatory reporting rule within seven days. [19]
This could prove quite interesting, especially if the state health department decides to invalidate positive results obtained from tests run above a certain amplification threshold. Time will tell exactly how this reporting requirement might influence pandemic response measures such as mask mandates and lockdowns.
PORTUGAL RULES QUARANTINE BASED ON PCR RESULTS IS UNLAWFUL
In related news, an appeals court in Portugal recently ruled that the PCR test is "not a reliable test for SARS-CoV-2" and that "a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection." Therefore, "any enforced quarantine based on the results is unlawful." [20][21][22]
The court also noted that forcing healthy people to self-isolate could be a violation of their fundamental right to liberty. The case was brought by four German tourists who had been forced to self-quarantine after one of them tested positive.
Several scientific studies were brought forth as evidence in this case, including a September 28, 2020, study in Clinical Infectious Diseases, which found that when you run a PCR test at a CT of 35 or higher, the accuracy drops to 3%, resulting in a 97% false positive rate. The court ruled that, based on the science presented, any PCR test using a CT over is unreliable. [23][25]
FATAL ERRORS FOUND IN PAPER ON WHICH PCR TESTING IS BASED
The Portuguese appeals court is not alone in its critique of the PCR test being used as the sole criteria for quarantine. November 30, 2020, the scientific paper describing the work flow of how to use the PCR test to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection--which was quickly accepted as the standard by the WHO and applied across the world--was challenged by 22 international scientists who demand that the paper be retracted due to "fatal errors." [24][25][26]
The paper in question was written by Christian Drosten, Ph.D., a German virologist, and Victor Corman, who heads a German working group on virus diagnostics and clinical virology. According to Reiner Fuellmich, founding member of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss, or ACU), Drosten is a key culprit in the COVID-19 pandemic hoax. [27][28][29][30]
One of the key "fatal errors" in the Corman-Drosten paper is that they wrote it--and developed the PCR test--before there was any viral isolate available. All they used was the genetic sequence published online by Chinese scientists in January 2020.
Interestingly, the supposedly peer-reviewed] paper was published a mere 24 hours after it was submitted, which suggests that it actually wasn't peer-reviewed before being embraced by the whole world. How could it have been in such a short time? Undercover DC interviewed Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of the 22 scientists who are now demanding the paper's retraction, who stated: [31]
"Every scientific rationale for the development of that test has been totally destroyed by this paper. It's like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the COVID test.
"When Drosten developed the test, China hadn't given them a viral isolate. They developed the test from a sequence in a gene bank. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. They had a code, but no body for the code. No viral morphology.
"In the fish market, it's like giving you a few bones and saying 'that's your fish.' It could be any fish... Listen, the Corman-Drosten paper, there's nothing from a patient in it. It's all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren't there they made up.
"They synthetically created them to fill in the blanks. That's what genetics is; it's a code. So, its ABBBCCDDD and you're missing some, what you think is EEE, so you put it in... This is basically a computer virus.
"There are 10 fatal errors in this Drosten test paper... But here is the bottom line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they were doing. The PCR products of the amplification didn't correspond to any viral isolate at that time. I call it 'donut ring science.' There is nothing at the center of it. It's all about code, genetics, nothing to do with reality...
"There have since been papers saying they've produced viral isolates. But there are no controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July... where they said: 'Here's the viral isolate.' Do you know what they did? They swabbed one person. One person, who'd been to China and had cold symptoms. One person. And they assumed he had [COVID-19] to begin with. So, it's all full of holes, the whole thing."
NO VIABLE VIRUS FOUND IN POSITIVE CASES
The critique against PCR testing is further strengthened by a November 20, 2020, study in Nature Communications, which found no viable virus in PCR-positive cases. The study evaluated data from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan, China, who had undergone PCR testing between May 14 and June 1, 2020. [32]
A total of 300 tested positive but had no symptoms. Of the 34,424 people with a history of COVID-19, 107 tested positive a second time. Yet when they did virus cultures on these 407 individuals who had tested positive (either for the first or second time), no live virus was ever found.
EXPOSE THE FRAUD AND END THE MISERY
A number of experts have now come forward, calling out the COVID-19 pandemic as a cruel hoax perpetuated by fatally flawed testing. Aside from this testing data, there's no evidence of a lethal pandemic at all. While there is such a thing as COVID-19, and people have and do die from it, there are no excess deaths due to it. [33[34][35]
In other words, the total Mortality Rate for 2020 is basically normal, not significantly different than it has been over the past decade, in fact, especially when you consider things like population increases. The pandemic has not killed more people than would die in any given year--from something, anything--anyway. So, unless we think we should shut down the world and stop living because people die from heart disease, diabetes, cancer, the flu or anything else, then there's no reason to shut down the world because some people happen to die from COVID-19. [39]
The good news is the hoax is starting to be exposed, and will continue to be exposed as more cases are brought before the courts of the world. As for what you can do, consider:
- Turning off mainstream media news, and turning instead to independent experts. Do the research. Read through the science.
- Continue to counter the censorship by asking questions--The more questions are asked, the more answers will come to light. Arm yourself with mortality statistics and the facts on PCR testing, so you can explain how and why this pandemic simply isn't really a grave one that justifies the sort of Draconian "counter-measures" that are currently being implemented.
- If you are a medical professional, especially if you're a member of a professional society, write an open letter to your government, urging them to speak to and heed recommendations from independent experts. Sign The Great Barrington Declaration, which calls for an end to lockdowns. [36]
REFERENCES
1. https://www.ddponline.org/
2. https://tinyurl.com/yc67yo8e
3. https://tinyurl.com/y494kz2v
4. https://youtu.be/a_Vy6fgaBPE?t=260
5. https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
6, 7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10096-020-03913-9
7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13. https://tinyurl.com/yyyjun95
14, 17. https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/infectious-positive-pcr-test-result-covid-19/
15. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.04.20167932v4
16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32442256/
18. https://tinyurl.com/yc3w3jvk
19. https://tinyurl.com/y56ht8wn
20. https://tinyurl.com/yynsvyw4
21. https://tinyurl.com/yxhxywrb
22. https://tinyurl.com/y46uybaq
23. https://tinyurl.com/yxs6d4gl
24. https://tinyurl.com/rrepus7
25. https://cormandrostenreview.com/
26, 31. https://tinyurl.com/y4xgsck8
27. https://www.fuellmich.com/dr-reiner-fuellmich/
28. https://acu2020.org/
29. https://acu2020.org/english-versions/
30. https://tinyurl.com/yd3cpqpg
32. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
33. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjYvitCeMPc
34. https://tinyurl.com/y9fcl2gl
35. https://tinyurl.com/yyryvj9x
36. https://gbdeclaration.org/
37. https://tinyurl.com/y73j4ruu
38. https://tinyurl.com/yymmcdfr
39. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/provisional-tables.htm
#Medicine #COVID19 #Virus #COVIDTruth #WHO #Society #Freedom #Pandemics #Epidemiology #PCRTests #PCRTesting #Medicine #Virology #COVIDTruth #ScientificFraud
Free societies prefer private governance to public governance. Historically, we have applied this logic against Socialism, Fascism, war, macroeconomic planning, public goods, monetary policy, countercyclical fiscal policy, environmental regulation, and a hundred other issues. We’ve always made a solid case for pure freedom, and how that system always works better for society than does the heavy hand of an authoritarian government.
And yet here we are now living in times when the government is controlling our movements, shuttering our businesses, defining who and what is, or is not, "essential," dangerously disrupting commercial supply chains, forcibly closing our schools and churches, and restricting our travel. A shelter-in-place order is something of a nightmare for those of us who believe in Freedom. We see that as the worst-possible use of coercive power against Individual Rights, and we also see that the results have been catastrophic to our society.
We have a very thin record of writings that make the case that freedom, market forces, and private governance are better than government quarantines and closures in dealing with pandemics. All we have is the Draconian edicts set out by the Neo-cons in the Bush administration, most of whom were not even doctors, that were developed in the wake of 9/11. So where do we turn for better arguments and a better case?
Let me introduce you to Dr. Donald A. Henderson (1928-2016). He was the twentieth-century’s most acclaimed disease eradicator. In particular, he is credited with ridding the world of smallpox. He was a world renowned epidemiologist who trained at the Epidemic Intelligence Service of the Communicable Disease Center, and who headed the World Health Organization’s division that was focused on smallpox.
Here is what he wrote in his 2006 white paper, which is entitled " Disease Mitigation Measures in the Control of Pandemic Influenza."
"Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted. Strong political and public health leadership to provide reassurance and to ensure that needed medical care services are provided are critical elements. If either is seen to be less than optimal, a manageable epidemic could move toward catastrophe.
"There are no historical observations or scientific studies that support the confinement by quarantine of groups of possibly infected people for extended periods in order to slow the spread of any respiratory virus. A World Health Organization (WHO) Writing Group, after reviewing the literature and considering contemporary international experience, concluded that “forced isolation and quarantine are ineffective and impractical.” Despite this recommendation by experts, mandatory large-scale quarantine continues to be considered as an option by some authorities and government officials.
"The interest in quarantine reflects the views and conditions prevalent more than 50 years ago, when much less was known about the epidemiology of infectious diseases and when there was far less international and domestic travel in a less densely populated world. It is difficult to identify circumstances in the past half-century when large-scale quarantine has been effectively used in the control of any disease. The negative consequences of large-scale quarantine are so extreme (forced confinement of sick people with the well; complete restriction of movement of large populations; difficulty in getting critical supplies, medicines, and food to people inside the quarantine zone) that this mitigation measure should be eliminated from serious consideration."
Contrast all that this renowned epidemiologist said with the horror show that is the government's handling of this PLANdemic under the guidance of the Globalist traitors, like the Jesuit Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins who are currently ruining Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness in America today.
Hmmm
Nope. What we are witnessing now is a giant, worldwide PSYOP and Globalist takeover operation, the scope and nature of which is unparalleled in human history. And those who are responsible for this GREATEST CRIME EVER COMMITTED AGAINST HUMANITY must be punished for what they have done.
#Medicine #COVID19 #COVIDTruth #WHO #Society #Freedom #Pandemics #Authoritarianism #Totalitarianism #Lockdown #Quarantine #Epidemiology
And yet here we are now living in times when the government is controlling our movements, shuttering our businesses, defining who and what is, or is not, "essential," dangerously disrupting commercial supply chains, forcibly closing our schools and churches, and restricting our travel. A shelter-in-place order is something of a nightmare for those of us who believe in Freedom. We see that as the worst-possible use of coercive power against Individual Rights, and we also see that the results have been catastrophic to our society.
We have a very thin record of writings that make the case that freedom, market forces, and private governance are better than government quarantines and closures in dealing with pandemics. All we have is the Draconian edicts set out by the Neo-cons in the Bush administration, most of whom were not even doctors, that were developed in the wake of 9/11. So where do we turn for better arguments and a better case?
Let me introduce you to Dr. Donald A. Henderson (1928-2016). He was the twentieth-century’s most acclaimed disease eradicator. In particular, he is credited with ridding the world of smallpox. He was a world renowned epidemiologist who trained at the Epidemic Intelligence Service of the Communicable Disease Center, and who headed the World Health Organization’s division that was focused on smallpox.
Here is what he wrote in his 2006 white paper, which is entitled " Disease Mitigation Measures in the Control of Pandemic Influenza."
"Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted. Strong political and public health leadership to provide reassurance and to ensure that needed medical care services are provided are critical elements. If either is seen to be less than optimal, a manageable epidemic could move toward catastrophe.
"There are no historical observations or scientific studies that support the confinement by quarantine of groups of possibly infected people for extended periods in order to slow the spread of any respiratory virus. A World Health Organization (WHO) Writing Group, after reviewing the literature and considering contemporary international experience, concluded that “forced isolation and quarantine are ineffective and impractical.” Despite this recommendation by experts, mandatory large-scale quarantine continues to be considered as an option by some authorities and government officials.
"The interest in quarantine reflects the views and conditions prevalent more than 50 years ago, when much less was known about the epidemiology of infectious diseases and when there was far less international and domestic travel in a less densely populated world. It is difficult to identify circumstances in the past half-century when large-scale quarantine has been effectively used in the control of any disease. The negative consequences of large-scale quarantine are so extreme (forced confinement of sick people with the well; complete restriction of movement of large populations; difficulty in getting critical supplies, medicines, and food to people inside the quarantine zone) that this mitigation measure should be eliminated from serious consideration."
Contrast all that this renowned epidemiologist said with the horror show that is the government's handling of this PLANdemic under the guidance of the Globalist traitors, like the Jesuit Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins who are currently ruining Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness in America today.
Hmmm
Nope. What we are witnessing now is a giant, worldwide PSYOP and Globalist takeover operation, the scope and nature of which is unparalleled in human history. And those who are responsible for this GREATEST CRIME EVER COMMITTED AGAINST HUMANITY must be punished for what they have done.
#Medicine #COVID19 #COVIDTruth #WHO #Society #Freedom #Pandemics #Authoritarianism #Totalitarianism #Lockdown #Quarantine #Epidemiology
From the moment of "COVID-19's" naming--and particularly since the imposition of unprecedented restrictions on life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness--some people have smelled a rat. And with each passing week, the smell becomes worse. A growing chorus of ordinary citizens and world-renowned medical and scientific experts is raising questions about matters ranging from the coronavirus's origins to the rationale for continued lock-downs.
The mainstream propaganda media have shown themselves only too ready to lob ad hominem attacks against any and all such non-conformists. However, one does not have to be insensitive to the illness and deaths associated with COVID-19 to recognize that powerful agendas are riding on the coattails of SARS-CoV-2. Citizens are waking up to the fact that the countries, officials and public figures who embrace draconian interventions such as immunity certificates, microchipping, forced vaccination and the removal of children from their homes also approve of making our sovereign rights--whether to earn a living, maintain bodily integrity, congregate to practice our spirituality, enjoy the arts or protect and educate our children--contingent upon our acceptance of these Big Brother measures and technologies.
The following Timeline of Events is intended to make it easier for everybody to assess what is happening, and what is at stake. You're invited to consider how these events--some of them seemingly unrelated--and the network of partnerships and relationships that they illustrate have contributed to the unfolding set of circumstances in which we now find ourselves.
While the lock-down is a cataclysm for the world economy, it is a huge opportunity for Bill Gates" and the billionaire club of eugenicists who he represents.
Around the world, many people are understandably reeling in shock at the rapid economic, social and cultural changes that have followed in the wake of the phenomenon called "COVID-19." Many of these changes involve ever-tighter restrictions on our rights and freedoms, accompanied by inexorable messaging--both public and subliminal--promoting the notion that a "vaccine for all" and 24/7 tracking and surveillance are the only way out. Increasingly, however, there are hopeful signs that more members of the public are recognizing the duplicity and self-interest of those offering humanity this false salvation. Each of us needs to do our part to expose these issues, standing up for individual sovereignty and working to halt the transition "to a totalitarian singularity more despotic than George Orwell could have ever ever imagined."
Notes/Explanatory Context
Gain-of-function research: COVID-19 has prompted renewed questioning about a long-debated branch of virology that, around 2012, scientists benignly rebranded as "gain-of-function" (GOF) research. GOF experiments seek to generate viruses "with properties that do not exist in nature" or, stated another way, "alter a pathogen to make it more transmissible or deadly." One of the leading proponents of GOF work is Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill (UNC), a "legend in coronavirology" and "trailblazer of synthetic genomic manipulation techniques" who specializes in engineering lethal coronaviruses from "mail-order DNA." Baric and other GOF enthusiasts argue that this type of viral tinkering is "critical to the development of broad-based vaccines and therapeutics," but critics, such as Dr. Thomas Inglesby (director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security) and tens of thousands of other renowned scientists, deny that their is any worthwhile benefit derived from GOF research.
Timeline of Facts and Events
1998
May 18: The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and 20 states file antitrust charges against Microsoft.
2000
2000: Bill Gates steps down from his position as Microsoft CEO, and Bill and Melinda Gates launch their eponymous foundation.
2000: The Gates Foundation (along with other partners) launches the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), known today as Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. The foundation has given $4.1 billion to Gavi over the past 20 years.
2001
November: After initially losing the antitrust lawsuit and appealing the decision, Microsoft settles its case with the DOJ out of court.
2002
November 2002: University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill (UNC) researcher Ralph Baric publishes a "breakthrough work" in gain-of-function research (studies that alter pathogens to make them more transmissible or deadly, see Notes above), describing the creation of a synthetic clone of a natural mouse coronavirus.
November 2002: China's Guangdong province reports the first case of "atypical pneumonia" (later labeled as SARS).
The speed of the Baric group illustrates how quickly a qualified team of virologists can create a synthetic clone from a natural virus, and therefore make genetic modifications to it.
2003
October 28: A paper by the Baric research group at UNC describes their synthetic recreation of the "previously undescribed" SARS coronavirus. (Writing in 2020, a scientist states, "The speed of the Baric group illustrates how quickly a qualified team of virologists can create a synthetic clone from a natural virus, and therefore make genetic modifications to it. Moreover, that was back in 2003. Today, a qualified laboratory can repeat those steps in a matter of weeks.")
2005
December: Congress approves the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, which authorizes the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) "to issue a PREP Act Declaration . . . that provides immunity from liability for any loss caused, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from administration or use of countermeasures to diseases, threats, and conditions determined in the Declaration to constitute a present or credible risk of a future public health emergency."
2009
2009-present (and earlier): The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation awards millions of dollars in global health funding to Imperial College London; funding covers areas such as polio, HIV, family planning, malaria, health care delivery, agricultural development, information technology and "public awareness and analysis."
2009: The Gates Foundation funds human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine trials in India, administering the vaccine to 23,000 young girls in remote provinces. Seven die and approximately 1,200 suffer autoimmune conditions, fertility disorders or other severe reactions. Ethical violations include forged consent forms and refusal of medical treatment for the injured girls.
October 2009: Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), goes on YouTube to declare that serious adverse events for the H1N1 influenza vaccine are "very, very, very rare." Months later, serious adverse events such as miscarriages, narcolepsy and febrile convulsions explode in multiple countries.
2010
January: Bill Gates pledges $10 billion in funding for the World Health Organization (WHO) and announces "the Decade of Vaccines."
May 18: Senator and physician Tom Coburn calls out Dr. Fauci for misleadingly touting "significant progress in HIV vaccine research"--research that has ushered millions into NIAID's coffers. Dr. Coburn stated, "Most scientists involved in AIDS research believe that an HIV vaccine is further away than ever."
2011
December 30: Dr. Fauci promotes gain-of-function research on bird flu viruses, arguing that the research is worth the risk. The risks worry other "seasoned researchers."
2012
April 20: Baylor College researchers publish their evaluation of four vaccine candidates for SARS, concluding that "Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated."
May: The 194 Member States of the World Health Assembly endorse the Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP), led by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in collaboration with NIAID, WHO, Gavi, UNICEF and others. Dr. Fauci is one of five members on the GVAP's Leadership Council.
2014
2014: Dr. Deborah Birx takes the helm of PEPFAR (the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief), which Dr. Fauci helped launch (in 2003) and which benefits from generous Gates Foundation support. Birx and Fauci are long-time allies, having worked together during the early years of AIDS and sharing overlapping career paths.
October 7: National Institutes of Health (NIH) director Francis Collins announces a "new phase of cooperation" between NIH and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, including partnering for vaccine development.
October 17: Under President Obama, the NIH halts federal funding for gain-of-function (GOF) research (see Notes) and asks federally funded GOF researchers to "agree to a voluntary moratorium." The funding hiatus applies to 21 studies "reasonably anticipated to confer attributes to influenza, MERS, or SARS viruses such that the virus would have enhanced pathogenicity and/or transmissibility in mammals via the respiratory route." NIH later allows 10 of the studies to resume.
These data and restrictions represent a crossroads of [gain-of-function] research concerns; the potential to prepare for and mitigate future outbreaks must be weighed against the risk of creating more dangerous pathogens.
2015
2015: NIAID, under Fauci, awards a five-year, $3.7 million grant to EcoHealth Alliance (whose director gets credit on subsequent publications for "funding acquisition" rather than scientific work) to conduct gain-of-function studies on the "risk of bat coronavirus emergence." Ten percent of the award goes to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which does "the bulk of the on-the-ground sample collection and analysis."
September 24: UNC's Ralph Baric is granted a patent for the creation of chimeric coronavirus spike proteins.
November 9: Baric and the Wuhan Institute's Shi Zheng-Li (the leading GOF coronavirus researcher in China) publish what some refer to as "the most famous gain-of-function virology paper" (in Nature Medicine), describing their creation of a synthetic chimeric coronavirus. The authors state: "[T]hese data and restrictions represent a crossroads of GOF research concerns; the potential to prepare for and mitigate future outbreaks must be weighed against the risk of creating more dangerous pathogens [emphasis added]. In developing policies moving forward, it is important to consider the value of the data generated by these studies and whether these types of chimeric virus studies warrant further investigation versus the inherent risks involved."
2016
2016: The National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity states that "very few government-funded gain-of-function experiments [pose] a significant threat to public health."
Researchers blame the Gates-funded polio vaccination campaign for almost half a million cases of childhood paralysis.
2017
February 8: The Modi administration in India severs ties with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, after researchers blame the Gates-funded polio vaccination campaign for almost half a million cases of childhood paralysis.
November 30: Shi Zheng-Li and coauthors publish a paper in PLoS Pathogens describing the creation of eight new synthetic coronaviruses.
December 19: The NIH and Dr. Fauci's NIAID restore federal funding for gain-of-function research, ending the moratorium that began in October 2014.
December 19: Dr. Marc Lipsitch of the Harvard School of Public Health tells the New York Times that the type of gain-of-function experiments endorsed by Dr. Fauci's NIAID have "done almost nothing to improve our preparedness for pandemics, and yet risked creating an accidental pandemic."
NIAID awards a six-year renewal grant of $3.7 million to EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology to continue their gain-of-function studies on bat coronaviruses.
2019
2019: NIAID awards a six-year renewal grant of $3.7 million to EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology to continue their gain-of-function studies on bat coronaviruses. The renewal is approved "unusually quickly," receiving a "really extremely high priority for funding."
August 14: Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) records show that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation owns 5.3 million shares of Crown Castle International Corp., representing the Foundation's second largest tech holding after Microsoft. Crown Castle dominates ownership of 5G infrastructure throughout the U.S., including cell towers, small cell nodes and fiber.
October: A report released by NBC News in May, 2020 declares, "The analysis of commercial telemetry data in Wuhan suggests the COVID-19 pandemic began earlier than initially reported" and "supports the release of COVID-19 at the Wuhan Institute of Virology." NBC's May 8 summary states, "there was no cellphone activity in a high-security portion of the Wuhan Institute of Virology from Oct. 7 through Oct. 24, 2019, and that there may have been a ‘hazardous event' sometime between Oct. 6 and Oct. 11."
October 6: On May 5, 2020, British and French researchers publish a study estimating that COVID-19 could have started as early as October 6, 2019.
October 18: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security convene an invitation-only "tabletop exercise" called Event 201 to map out the response to a hypothetical global coronavirus pandemic.
November-December: General practitioners in northern Italy start noticing a "strange pneumonia."
December 2-3: Vaccine scientists attending the WHO's Global Vaccine Safety Summit confirm major problems with vaccine safety around the world.
December 18: Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) report the development of a "novel way to record a patient's vaccination history," using smartphone-readable nanocrystals called "quantum dots" embedded in the skin using microneedles--this work is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
December 31: Chinese officials inform the WHO about a cluster of "mysterious pneumonia" cases. Later, the South China Morning Post reports that it can trace the first case back to November 17.
Dr. Peter Hotez of Baylor College … tells a Congressional Committee that coronavirus vaccines have always had a "unique potential safety problem"
2020
January 7: Chinese authorities formally identify a "novel" coronavirus.
January 10: China makes the [alleged] genome sequence of the new coronavirus publicly available. However, China does not provide any quantifiable [isolated] samples of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which researchers would require in order to verify the genome, develop testing apparatuses, treatments, or vaccines.
January 11: China records its first death attributed to the new coronavirus.
January 20: The first U.S. coronavirus case is reported in Washington State.
January 23: Shi Zheng-Li releases a paper reporting that the new coronavirus is 96% identical to a strain that her lab isolated from bats in 2013 but never publicized.
January 30: The WHO declares the new coronavirus a "global health emergency."
Jan. 31, 2020: A group of Indian scientists publishes a study finding HIV sequences in the 2019-nCoV coronavirus. The scientists withdraw the study withdrew the study within 24 hours, presumably under some pressure.
February 4: With just 11 people in the U.S. who are confirmed to have COVID-19, HHS issues a Declaration, published on March 17 in the Federal Register, that places the new coronavirus under the umbrella of the 2005 PREP Act, making medical countermeasures (including vaccines) immune from liability.
February 5: Bill and Melinda Gates announce $100 million in funding for coronavirus vaccine research and treatment efforts.
February 10: French and Canadian scientists publish a paper about the new coronavirus describing an "important" anomaly--12 additional nucleotides--not observed in previous coronaviruses. They suggest that the distinct feature "may provide a gain-of-function . . . for efficient spreading in the human population."
February 11: The WHO gives the disease thought to be caused by the new coronavirus a name: "COVID-19." WHO's Director-General explains, "We had to find a name that did not refer to a geographical location, an animal, an individual or group of people, and which is also pronounceable and related to the disease."
February 24: Moderna, Inc. sends the first batch of its experimental coronavirus vaccine, mRNA-1273, to its research partner, NIAID.
February 25: Moderna stock shares trade 15% higher.
February 29: The U.S. reports its first COVID-19 death.
March 5: Dr. Peter Hotez of Baylor College (who has previously tried to develop a SARS vaccine) tells a Congressional Committee that coronavirus vaccines have always had a "unique potential safety problem"--a "kind of paradoxical immune enhancement phenomenon."
March 6: President Trump signs an $8.3 billion emergency coronavirus spending package, much of which "directly benefit[s] the drug industry."
March 10: Dr. Paul Offit of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia expresses concerns about the push to "rush [a vaccine] through," particularly in the absence of "any history of making a coronavirus vaccine."
March 10: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome and Mastercard commit $125 million to identify, assess, develop and scale up COVID-19 treatments, forming the COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator. The $50 million in Gates Foundation funding is part of the $100 million in COVID-19 funding announced by Gates on February 5.
March 11: The WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic.
March 13: Bill Gates steps down from the Boards of Microsoft and Berkshire Hathaway to "dedicate more time to philanthropic priorities."
March 16: Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London, scientific advisor to the UK government, publishes his computer simulations warning that there will be over two million COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. unless the country adopts "intensive and socially disruptive measures."
March 16: Dr. Fauci tells Americans that they must be prepared to "take more drastic steps" and "hunker down significantly" to slow the coronavirus's spread.
March 16: NIAID launches a Phase 1 trial in 45 healthy adults of the mRNA-1273 coronavirus vaccine co-developed by NIAID and Moderna, Inc. The trial skips the customary step of testing the vaccine in animal models prior to proceeding to human trials.
March 17: The Nation publishes an analysis covering conflicts of interest in the Gates Foundation's charitable giving, describing "close to $2 billion in tax-deductible charitable donations to private companies," including GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), and "close to $250 million in charitable grants . . . to companies in which the foundation holds corporate stocks and bonds," including Merck, GSK, Sanofi and other pharmaceutical corporations. A critic states that the foundation has "created one of the most problematic precedents in the history of foundation giving by essentially opening the door for corporations to see themselves as deserving charity claimants at a time when corporate profits are at an all-time high."
March 22: U.S. bioweapons expert Dr. Francis Boyle repeats earlier statements that the purpose of Biosafety Level 4 (BSL-4) labs such as the Wuhan Institute of Virology "is the research, development, testing and stockpiling of offensive biological weapons" and that the new virus is a "weaponized" SARS coronavirus that leaked out of the Wuhan BSL-4 lab.
Bill Gates announces significant funding for a company, EarthNow, that will blanket Earth with $1 billion in video surveillance satellites.
March 24: Bill Gates announces significant funding for a company, EarthNow, that will blanket Earth with $1 billion in video surveillance satellites.
March 26: Microsoft announces that it is acquiring Affirmed Networks, a company focused on 5G and "edge computing."
March 26: Dr. Fauci publishes an editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine (with senior NIAID official H. Clifford Lane and CDC director Robert Redfield), stating that "the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza," with a case fatality rate of perhaps 0.1%.
March 27: President Trump signs the $2 trillion CARES Act into law.
March 27: Children's Health Defense publishes its video and article, "Dr. Fauci and COVID-19 priorities: therapeutics now or vaccines later?" Shortly thereafter, Mailchimp deactivates CHD's account with no advance notice and no violation of Mailchimp's rules.
March 29: President Trump extends nationwide social distancing guidelines until April 30.
March 31: White House coronavirus advisors Dr. Deborah Birx and Dr. Fauci cite models showing a potential 100,000 to 240,000 coronavirus deaths "even if the country keeps stringent social distancing guidelines in place." Fauci describes social distancing and lockdowns as "inconvenient" but "the answer to our problems."
April 2: Bill Gates states that a coronavirus vaccine "is the only thing that will allow us to return to normal."
April 3: Forbes reports that Moderna's CEO has become an overnight billionaire after the company ended 2019 with a net loss.
April 6: Dr. Fauci describes a COVID-19 vaccine as a "showstopper" and states, "I hope we don't have so many people infected that we actually have . . . herd immunity."
April 9: Dr. Fauci states that the U.S. death toll from the coronavirus "looks more like the 60,000 [range]," adding the "models are really only as good as the assumptions that you put into the model."
April 9: The Gates-funded Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) reports that 115 COVID-19 vaccines are in the pipeline.
April 9: Children's Health Defense publishes "Gates' globalist vaccine agenda: a win-win for pharma and mandatory vaccination."
April 11: Children's Health Defense publishes "Here's why Bill Gates wants indemnity… Are you willing to take the risk?"
April 15: Bill Gates pledges another $150 million to coronavirus vaccine development and other measures. He states, "There are seven billion people on the planet. We are going to need to vaccinate nearly every one."
April 16: Moderna announces up to $483 million in funding from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) to speed up the mRNA-1273 vaccine's development.
April 18: Professor Luc Montagnier, recipient of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine for his discovery of HIV, appears on French television and states that SARS-CoV-2 has been "manipulated" to include "added sequences" from HIV. Professor Montagnier asserts that this "meticulous" insertion could only have been carried out in a laboratory. Others raise similar questions about the origins of SARS-CoV-2.
April 18: News outlets report that the country's first coronavirus tests are ineffective due to CDC lab contamination and the CDC's violation of its manufacturing standards.
April 21: Washington State announces plans to have a 1,500-person contact tracing team in place by mid-May.
April 23: Researchers issue a preprint reporting "direct evidence" of at least 30 different SARS-CoV-2 genetic variants.
April 23: News outlets report that American billionaires' wealth increased by 10% during the first few months of COVID-19.
April 23: Children's Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. publishes "The Bill Gates effect: WHO's DTP vaccine killed more children in Africa than the diseases it targeted."
April 24: The NIH cancels the funding awarded to EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology for gain-of-function research on coronaviruses (funding awarded continuously since 2015). The NIH and Dr. Fauci decline to comment.
April 27: Former FDA head Scott Gottlieb (now with Pfizer) and former Medicare/Medicaid official Andy Slavitt urge the Trump administration to dedicate $46 billion to contact tracing and isolation.
April 28: A Newsweek article reports, "Dr. Fauci backed controversial Wuhan lab with U.S. dollars for risky coronavirus research." Fauci does not respond to requests for comments.
April 29: Bloomberg publishes a story about President Trump's "Operation Warp Speed," a planned pharmaceutical-government-military collaboration to shrink the development time for a coronavirus vaccine.
April 30: Bill Gates writes that "the world will be able to go back to the way things were . . . when almost every person on the planet has been vaccinated against coronavirus." Gates also states that "Governments will need to expedite their usual drug approval processes in order to deliver the vaccine to over 7 billion people quickly."
April 30: Dr. Fauci states that it is "doable" to have hundreds of millions of doses of a coronavirus vaccine available by January 2021.
May 1: Dr. Thomas Inglesby (director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security), discussing gain-of-function research, states that "laboratory systems are not infallible, and even in the greatest laboratories of the world, there are mistakes."
May 1: Democratic Representative Bobby Rush of Illinois introduces the TRACE Act ("HR 6666: COVID-19 Testing, Reaching, and Contacting Everyone"). The conspicuously vague Act would allocate $100 billion to CDC-hired entities for contact tracing and "other purposes," including family separation. (See also May 15.)
May 4: Bill Gates pledges another $50 million toward COVID-19, for a total of $300 million in commitments.
May 4: President Trump states that the U.S. will have a coronavirus vaccine by the end of 2020.
May 5: British and French researchers publish "Emergence of genomic diversity and recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2," suggesting that the recurrent mutations detected "may indicate ongoing adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 to its novel human host."
May 5: Neil Ferguson resigns from the UK government's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) after flouting his own social distancing rules. The married lover with whom Ferguson has his trysts works for an organization "loosely connected with Bill Gates, through the World Economic Forum."
May 5: Children's Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. publishes "Redfield and Birx: can they be trusted with COVID?"
May 6: An anonymous software engineer (ex-Google) pronounces Neil Ferguson's COVID-19 computer model "unusable for scientific purposes."
May 6: New York governor Andrew Cuomo announces that the state will partner with "visionary" Bill Gates to restructure education by placing "technology at the forefront." Cuomo appoints former Google CEO Eric Schmidt to lead a blue-ribbon committee for this purpose. Critics push back, describing past Gates-Foundation-funded educational fiascos that amassed "detailed personal information about millions of students" in the cloud.
May 7: Business Insider reports that over 33 million Americans have filed for unemployment over the seven-week period since COVID-19 restrictions began.
May 7: NPR reports that 44 states and the District of Columbia have plans to deploy a contact tracing workforce of over 66,000 workers.
May 8: NBC News releases a private report describing an unconfirmed shutdown of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in October 2019.
May 8: Children's Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Dafna Tachover (director of CHD's "Stop 5G and Wireless Harms Project") publish "The brave new world of Bill Gates and Big Telecom."
May 11: UK chief medical officer Dr. Chris Whitty (an insider who has received millions in malaria research funding from the Gates Foundation and who endorses stigma as a useful public health intervention) states that COVID-19 is "harmless to [the] vast majority."
May 13: Australian researchers report that "SARS-CoV-2 is uniquely adapted to infect humans, raising important questions as to whether it arose in nature by a rare chance event or whether its origins might lie elsewhere."
May 14: Microsoft announces that it is acquiring UK-based Metaswitch Networks "to expand its Azure 5G strategy."
May 15: The House passes the 1,815-page, $3 trillion HEROES Act ("Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency Solutions Act"), sneaking in portions of the TRACE ACT that would funnel $75 billion to the CDC for "coronavirus testing, contact tracing and isolation measures."
May 18: Moderna announces interim results from the Phase 1 trial of its mRNA-1273 coronavirus vaccine. The company reports that three out of 15 healthy participants (20%) experienced Grade 3 systemic adverse events following a second dose. (The Merck Manual defines Grade 3 as "severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care.")
May 18: Discussing the interim results from Moderna's Phase 1 trial of its mRNA-1273 vaccine--co-developed with NIAID--Dr. Fauci states: "I must warn that there's also the possibility of negative consequences, where certain vaccines can actually enhance the negative effect of the infection."
May 18: After describing its interim Phase 1 results as "promising," shares of Moderna stock soar 25%, closing at a "record high." The company's stock has gained 241% since the beginning of 2020.
May 20: Microsoft announces its new supercomputer intended to create "human-like" artificial intelligence.
#COVID #COVIDTruth #China #WHO #WEF #BillGates #AnthonyFauci #FrancisCollins #RalphBaric #Vaccines #Genocide #Eugenics
The mainstream propaganda media have shown themselves only too ready to lob ad hominem attacks against any and all such non-conformists. However, one does not have to be insensitive to the illness and deaths associated with COVID-19 to recognize that powerful agendas are riding on the coattails of SARS-CoV-2. Citizens are waking up to the fact that the countries, officials and public figures who embrace draconian interventions such as immunity certificates, microchipping, forced vaccination and the removal of children from their homes also approve of making our sovereign rights--whether to earn a living, maintain bodily integrity, congregate to practice our spirituality, enjoy the arts or protect and educate our children--contingent upon our acceptance of these Big Brother measures and technologies.
The following Timeline of Events is intended to make it easier for everybody to assess what is happening, and what is at stake. You're invited to consider how these events--some of them seemingly unrelated--and the network of partnerships and relationships that they illustrate have contributed to the unfolding set of circumstances in which we now find ourselves.
While the lock-down is a cataclysm for the world economy, it is a huge opportunity for Bill Gates" and the billionaire club of eugenicists who he represents.
Around the world, many people are understandably reeling in shock at the rapid economic, social and cultural changes that have followed in the wake of the phenomenon called "COVID-19." Many of these changes involve ever-tighter restrictions on our rights and freedoms, accompanied by inexorable messaging--both public and subliminal--promoting the notion that a "vaccine for all" and 24/7 tracking and surveillance are the only way out. Increasingly, however, there are hopeful signs that more members of the public are recognizing the duplicity and self-interest of those offering humanity this false salvation. Each of us needs to do our part to expose these issues, standing up for individual sovereignty and working to halt the transition "to a totalitarian singularity more despotic than George Orwell could have ever ever imagined."
Notes/Explanatory Context
Gain-of-function research: COVID-19 has prompted renewed questioning about a long-debated branch of virology that, around 2012, scientists benignly rebranded as "gain-of-function" (GOF) research. GOF experiments seek to generate viruses "with properties that do not exist in nature" or, stated another way, "alter a pathogen to make it more transmissible or deadly." One of the leading proponents of GOF work is Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill (UNC), a "legend in coronavirology" and "trailblazer of synthetic genomic manipulation techniques" who specializes in engineering lethal coronaviruses from "mail-order DNA." Baric and other GOF enthusiasts argue that this type of viral tinkering is "critical to the development of broad-based vaccines and therapeutics," but critics, such as Dr. Thomas Inglesby (director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security) and tens of thousands of other renowned scientists, deny that their is any worthwhile benefit derived from GOF research.
Timeline of Facts and Events
1998
May 18: The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and 20 states file antitrust charges against Microsoft.
2000
2000: Bill Gates steps down from his position as Microsoft CEO, and Bill and Melinda Gates launch their eponymous foundation.
2000: The Gates Foundation (along with other partners) launches the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), known today as Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. The foundation has given $4.1 billion to Gavi over the past 20 years.
2001
November: After initially losing the antitrust lawsuit and appealing the decision, Microsoft settles its case with the DOJ out of court.
2002
November 2002: University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill (UNC) researcher Ralph Baric publishes a "breakthrough work" in gain-of-function research (studies that alter pathogens to make them more transmissible or deadly, see Notes above), describing the creation of a synthetic clone of a natural mouse coronavirus.
November 2002: China's Guangdong province reports the first case of "atypical pneumonia" (later labeled as SARS).
The speed of the Baric group illustrates how quickly a qualified team of virologists can create a synthetic clone from a natural virus, and therefore make genetic modifications to it.
2003
October 28: A paper by the Baric research group at UNC describes their synthetic recreation of the "previously undescribed" SARS coronavirus. (Writing in 2020, a scientist states, "The speed of the Baric group illustrates how quickly a qualified team of virologists can create a synthetic clone from a natural virus, and therefore make genetic modifications to it. Moreover, that was back in 2003. Today, a qualified laboratory can repeat those steps in a matter of weeks.")
2005
December: Congress approves the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, which authorizes the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) "to issue a PREP Act Declaration . . . that provides immunity from liability for any loss caused, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from administration or use of countermeasures to diseases, threats, and conditions determined in the Declaration to constitute a present or credible risk of a future public health emergency."
2009
2009-present (and earlier): The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation awards millions of dollars in global health funding to Imperial College London; funding covers areas such as polio, HIV, family planning, malaria, health care delivery, agricultural development, information technology and "public awareness and analysis."
2009: The Gates Foundation funds human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine trials in India, administering the vaccine to 23,000 young girls in remote provinces. Seven die and approximately 1,200 suffer autoimmune conditions, fertility disorders or other severe reactions. Ethical violations include forged consent forms and refusal of medical treatment for the injured girls.
October 2009: Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), goes on YouTube to declare that serious adverse events for the H1N1 influenza vaccine are "very, very, very rare." Months later, serious adverse events such as miscarriages, narcolepsy and febrile convulsions explode in multiple countries.
2010
January: Bill Gates pledges $10 billion in funding for the World Health Organization (WHO) and announces "the Decade of Vaccines."
May 18: Senator and physician Tom Coburn calls out Dr. Fauci for misleadingly touting "significant progress in HIV vaccine research"--research that has ushered millions into NIAID's coffers. Dr. Coburn stated, "Most scientists involved in AIDS research believe that an HIV vaccine is further away than ever."
2011
December 30: Dr. Fauci promotes gain-of-function research on bird flu viruses, arguing that the research is worth the risk. The risks worry other "seasoned researchers."
2012
April 20: Baylor College researchers publish their evaluation of four vaccine candidates for SARS, concluding that "Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated."
May: The 194 Member States of the World Health Assembly endorse the Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP), led by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in collaboration with NIAID, WHO, Gavi, UNICEF and others. Dr. Fauci is one of five members on the GVAP's Leadership Council.
2014
2014: Dr. Deborah Birx takes the helm of PEPFAR (the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief), which Dr. Fauci helped launch (in 2003) and which benefits from generous Gates Foundation support. Birx and Fauci are long-time allies, having worked together during the early years of AIDS and sharing overlapping career paths.
October 7: National Institutes of Health (NIH) director Francis Collins announces a "new phase of cooperation" between NIH and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, including partnering for vaccine development.
October 17: Under President Obama, the NIH halts federal funding for gain-of-function (GOF) research (see Notes) and asks federally funded GOF researchers to "agree to a voluntary moratorium." The funding hiatus applies to 21 studies "reasonably anticipated to confer attributes to influenza, MERS, or SARS viruses such that the virus would have enhanced pathogenicity and/or transmissibility in mammals via the respiratory route." NIH later allows 10 of the studies to resume.
These data and restrictions represent a crossroads of [gain-of-function] research concerns; the potential to prepare for and mitigate future outbreaks must be weighed against the risk of creating more dangerous pathogens.
2015
2015: NIAID, under Fauci, awards a five-year, $3.7 million grant to EcoHealth Alliance (whose director gets credit on subsequent publications for "funding acquisition" rather than scientific work) to conduct gain-of-function studies on the "risk of bat coronavirus emergence." Ten percent of the award goes to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which does "the bulk of the on-the-ground sample collection and analysis."
September 24: UNC's Ralph Baric is granted a patent for the creation of chimeric coronavirus spike proteins.
November 9: Baric and the Wuhan Institute's Shi Zheng-Li (the leading GOF coronavirus researcher in China) publish what some refer to as "the most famous gain-of-function virology paper" (in Nature Medicine), describing their creation of a synthetic chimeric coronavirus. The authors state: "[T]hese data and restrictions represent a crossroads of GOF research concerns; the potential to prepare for and mitigate future outbreaks must be weighed against the risk of creating more dangerous pathogens [emphasis added]. In developing policies moving forward, it is important to consider the value of the data generated by these studies and whether these types of chimeric virus studies warrant further investigation versus the inherent risks involved."
2016
2016: The National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity states that "very few government-funded gain-of-function experiments [pose] a significant threat to public health."
Researchers blame the Gates-funded polio vaccination campaign for almost half a million cases of childhood paralysis.
2017
February 8: The Modi administration in India severs ties with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, after researchers blame the Gates-funded polio vaccination campaign for almost half a million cases of childhood paralysis.
November 30: Shi Zheng-Li and coauthors publish a paper in PLoS Pathogens describing the creation of eight new synthetic coronaviruses.
December 19: The NIH and Dr. Fauci's NIAID restore federal funding for gain-of-function research, ending the moratorium that began in October 2014.
December 19: Dr. Marc Lipsitch of the Harvard School of Public Health tells the New York Times that the type of gain-of-function experiments endorsed by Dr. Fauci's NIAID have "done almost nothing to improve our preparedness for pandemics, and yet risked creating an accidental pandemic."
NIAID awards a six-year renewal grant of $3.7 million to EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology to continue their gain-of-function studies on bat coronaviruses.
2019
2019: NIAID awards a six-year renewal grant of $3.7 million to EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology to continue their gain-of-function studies on bat coronaviruses. The renewal is approved "unusually quickly," receiving a "really extremely high priority for funding."
August 14: Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) records show that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation owns 5.3 million shares of Crown Castle International Corp., representing the Foundation's second largest tech holding after Microsoft. Crown Castle dominates ownership of 5G infrastructure throughout the U.S., including cell towers, small cell nodes and fiber.
October: A report released by NBC News in May, 2020 declares, "The analysis of commercial telemetry data in Wuhan suggests the COVID-19 pandemic began earlier than initially reported" and "supports the release of COVID-19 at the Wuhan Institute of Virology." NBC's May 8 summary states, "there was no cellphone activity in a high-security portion of the Wuhan Institute of Virology from Oct. 7 through Oct. 24, 2019, and that there may have been a ‘hazardous event' sometime between Oct. 6 and Oct. 11."
October 6: On May 5, 2020, British and French researchers publish a study estimating that COVID-19 could have started as early as October 6, 2019.
October 18: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security convene an invitation-only "tabletop exercise" called Event 201 to map out the response to a hypothetical global coronavirus pandemic.
November-December: General practitioners in northern Italy start noticing a "strange pneumonia."
December 2-3: Vaccine scientists attending the WHO's Global Vaccine Safety Summit confirm major problems with vaccine safety around the world.
December 18: Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) report the development of a "novel way to record a patient's vaccination history," using smartphone-readable nanocrystals called "quantum dots" embedded in the skin using microneedles--this work is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
December 31: Chinese officials inform the WHO about a cluster of "mysterious pneumonia" cases. Later, the South China Morning Post reports that it can trace the first case back to November 17.
Dr. Peter Hotez of Baylor College … tells a Congressional Committee that coronavirus vaccines have always had a "unique potential safety problem"
2020
January 7: Chinese authorities formally identify a "novel" coronavirus.
January 10: China makes the [alleged] genome sequence of the new coronavirus publicly available. However, China does not provide any quantifiable [isolated] samples of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which researchers would require in order to verify the genome, develop testing apparatuses, treatments, or vaccines.
January 11: China records its first death attributed to the new coronavirus.
January 20: The first U.S. coronavirus case is reported in Washington State.
January 23: Shi Zheng-Li releases a paper reporting that the new coronavirus is 96% identical to a strain that her lab isolated from bats in 2013 but never publicized.
January 30: The WHO declares the new coronavirus a "global health emergency."
Jan. 31, 2020: A group of Indian scientists publishes a study finding HIV sequences in the 2019-nCoV coronavirus. The scientists withdraw the study withdrew the study within 24 hours, presumably under some pressure.
February 4: With just 11 people in the U.S. who are confirmed to have COVID-19, HHS issues a Declaration, published on March 17 in the Federal Register, that places the new coronavirus under the umbrella of the 2005 PREP Act, making medical countermeasures (including vaccines) immune from liability.
February 5: Bill and Melinda Gates announce $100 million in funding for coronavirus vaccine research and treatment efforts.
February 10: French and Canadian scientists publish a paper about the new coronavirus describing an "important" anomaly--12 additional nucleotides--not observed in previous coronaviruses. They suggest that the distinct feature "may provide a gain-of-function . . . for efficient spreading in the human population."
February 11: The WHO gives the disease thought to be caused by the new coronavirus a name: "COVID-19." WHO's Director-General explains, "We had to find a name that did not refer to a geographical location, an animal, an individual or group of people, and which is also pronounceable and related to the disease."
February 24: Moderna, Inc. sends the first batch of its experimental coronavirus vaccine, mRNA-1273, to its research partner, NIAID.
February 25: Moderna stock shares trade 15% higher.
February 29: The U.S. reports its first COVID-19 death.
March 5: Dr. Peter Hotez of Baylor College (who has previously tried to develop a SARS vaccine) tells a Congressional Committee that coronavirus vaccines have always had a "unique potential safety problem"--a "kind of paradoxical immune enhancement phenomenon."
March 6: President Trump signs an $8.3 billion emergency coronavirus spending package, much of which "directly benefit[s] the drug industry."
March 10: Dr. Paul Offit of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia expresses concerns about the push to "rush [a vaccine] through," particularly in the absence of "any history of making a coronavirus vaccine."
March 10: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome and Mastercard commit $125 million to identify, assess, develop and scale up COVID-19 treatments, forming the COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator. The $50 million in Gates Foundation funding is part of the $100 million in COVID-19 funding announced by Gates on February 5.
March 11: The WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic.
March 13: Bill Gates steps down from the Boards of Microsoft and Berkshire Hathaway to "dedicate more time to philanthropic priorities."
March 16: Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London, scientific advisor to the UK government, publishes his computer simulations warning that there will be over two million COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. unless the country adopts "intensive and socially disruptive measures."
March 16: Dr. Fauci tells Americans that they must be prepared to "take more drastic steps" and "hunker down significantly" to slow the coronavirus's spread.
March 16: NIAID launches a Phase 1 trial in 45 healthy adults of the mRNA-1273 coronavirus vaccine co-developed by NIAID and Moderna, Inc. The trial skips the customary step of testing the vaccine in animal models prior to proceeding to human trials.
March 17: The Nation publishes an analysis covering conflicts of interest in the Gates Foundation's charitable giving, describing "close to $2 billion in tax-deductible charitable donations to private companies," including GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), and "close to $250 million in charitable grants . . . to companies in which the foundation holds corporate stocks and bonds," including Merck, GSK, Sanofi and other pharmaceutical corporations. A critic states that the foundation has "created one of the most problematic precedents in the history of foundation giving by essentially opening the door for corporations to see themselves as deserving charity claimants at a time when corporate profits are at an all-time high."
March 22: U.S. bioweapons expert Dr. Francis Boyle repeats earlier statements that the purpose of Biosafety Level 4 (BSL-4) labs such as the Wuhan Institute of Virology "is the research, development, testing and stockpiling of offensive biological weapons" and that the new virus is a "weaponized" SARS coronavirus that leaked out of the Wuhan BSL-4 lab.
Bill Gates announces significant funding for a company, EarthNow, that will blanket Earth with $1 billion in video surveillance satellites.
March 24: Bill Gates announces significant funding for a company, EarthNow, that will blanket Earth with $1 billion in video surveillance satellites.
March 26: Microsoft announces that it is acquiring Affirmed Networks, a company focused on 5G and "edge computing."
March 26: Dr. Fauci publishes an editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine (with senior NIAID official H. Clifford Lane and CDC director Robert Redfield), stating that "the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza," with a case fatality rate of perhaps 0.1%.
March 27: President Trump signs the $2 trillion CARES Act into law.
March 27: Children's Health Defense publishes its video and article, "Dr. Fauci and COVID-19 priorities: therapeutics now or vaccines later?" Shortly thereafter, Mailchimp deactivates CHD's account with no advance notice and no violation of Mailchimp's rules.
March 29: President Trump extends nationwide social distancing guidelines until April 30.
March 31: White House coronavirus advisors Dr. Deborah Birx and Dr. Fauci cite models showing a potential 100,000 to 240,000 coronavirus deaths "even if the country keeps stringent social distancing guidelines in place." Fauci describes social distancing and lockdowns as "inconvenient" but "the answer to our problems."
April 2: Bill Gates states that a coronavirus vaccine "is the only thing that will allow us to return to normal."
April 3: Forbes reports that Moderna's CEO has become an overnight billionaire after the company ended 2019 with a net loss.
April 6: Dr. Fauci describes a COVID-19 vaccine as a "showstopper" and states, "I hope we don't have so many people infected that we actually have . . . herd immunity."
April 9: Dr. Fauci states that the U.S. death toll from the coronavirus "looks more like the 60,000 [range]," adding the "models are really only as good as the assumptions that you put into the model."
April 9: The Gates-funded Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) reports that 115 COVID-19 vaccines are in the pipeline.
April 9: Children's Health Defense publishes "Gates' globalist vaccine agenda: a win-win for pharma and mandatory vaccination."
April 11: Children's Health Defense publishes "Here's why Bill Gates wants indemnity… Are you willing to take the risk?"
April 15: Bill Gates pledges another $150 million to coronavirus vaccine development and other measures. He states, "There are seven billion people on the planet. We are going to need to vaccinate nearly every one."
April 16: Moderna announces up to $483 million in funding from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) to speed up the mRNA-1273 vaccine's development.
April 18: Professor Luc Montagnier, recipient of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine for his discovery of HIV, appears on French television and states that SARS-CoV-2 has been "manipulated" to include "added sequences" from HIV. Professor Montagnier asserts that this "meticulous" insertion could only have been carried out in a laboratory. Others raise similar questions about the origins of SARS-CoV-2.
April 18: News outlets report that the country's first coronavirus tests are ineffective due to CDC lab contamination and the CDC's violation of its manufacturing standards.
April 21: Washington State announces plans to have a 1,500-person contact tracing team in place by mid-May.
April 23: Researchers issue a preprint reporting "direct evidence" of at least 30 different SARS-CoV-2 genetic variants.
April 23: News outlets report that American billionaires' wealth increased by 10% during the first few months of COVID-19.
April 23: Children's Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. publishes "The Bill Gates effect: WHO's DTP vaccine killed more children in Africa than the diseases it targeted."
April 24: The NIH cancels the funding awarded to EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology for gain-of-function research on coronaviruses (funding awarded continuously since 2015). The NIH and Dr. Fauci decline to comment.
April 27: Former FDA head Scott Gottlieb (now with Pfizer) and former Medicare/Medicaid official Andy Slavitt urge the Trump administration to dedicate $46 billion to contact tracing and isolation.
April 28: A Newsweek article reports, "Dr. Fauci backed controversial Wuhan lab with U.S. dollars for risky coronavirus research." Fauci does not respond to requests for comments.
April 29: Bloomberg publishes a story about President Trump's "Operation Warp Speed," a planned pharmaceutical-government-military collaboration to shrink the development time for a coronavirus vaccine.
April 30: Bill Gates writes that "the world will be able to go back to the way things were . . . when almost every person on the planet has been vaccinated against coronavirus." Gates also states that "Governments will need to expedite their usual drug approval processes in order to deliver the vaccine to over 7 billion people quickly."
April 30: Dr. Fauci states that it is "doable" to have hundreds of millions of doses of a coronavirus vaccine available by January 2021.
May 1: Dr. Thomas Inglesby (director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security), discussing gain-of-function research, states that "laboratory systems are not infallible, and even in the greatest laboratories of the world, there are mistakes."
May 1: Democratic Representative Bobby Rush of Illinois introduces the TRACE Act ("HR 6666: COVID-19 Testing, Reaching, and Contacting Everyone"). The conspicuously vague Act would allocate $100 billion to CDC-hired entities for contact tracing and "other purposes," including family separation. (See also May 15.)
May 4: Bill Gates pledges another $50 million toward COVID-19, for a total of $300 million in commitments.
May 4: President Trump states that the U.S. will have a coronavirus vaccine by the end of 2020.
May 5: British and French researchers publish "Emergence of genomic diversity and recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2," suggesting that the recurrent mutations detected "may indicate ongoing adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 to its novel human host."
May 5: Neil Ferguson resigns from the UK government's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) after flouting his own social distancing rules. The married lover with whom Ferguson has his trysts works for an organization "loosely connected with Bill Gates, through the World Economic Forum."
May 5: Children's Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. publishes "Redfield and Birx: can they be trusted with COVID?"
May 6: An anonymous software engineer (ex-Google) pronounces Neil Ferguson's COVID-19 computer model "unusable for scientific purposes."
May 6: New York governor Andrew Cuomo announces that the state will partner with "visionary" Bill Gates to restructure education by placing "technology at the forefront." Cuomo appoints former Google CEO Eric Schmidt to lead a blue-ribbon committee for this purpose. Critics push back, describing past Gates-Foundation-funded educational fiascos that amassed "detailed personal information about millions of students" in the cloud.
May 7: Business Insider reports that over 33 million Americans have filed for unemployment over the seven-week period since COVID-19 restrictions began.
May 7: NPR reports that 44 states and the District of Columbia have plans to deploy a contact tracing workforce of over 66,000 workers.
May 8: NBC News releases a private report describing an unconfirmed shutdown of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in October 2019.
May 8: Children's Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Dafna Tachover (director of CHD's "Stop 5G and Wireless Harms Project") publish "The brave new world of Bill Gates and Big Telecom."
May 11: UK chief medical officer Dr. Chris Whitty (an insider who has received millions in malaria research funding from the Gates Foundation and who endorses stigma as a useful public health intervention) states that COVID-19 is "harmless to [the] vast majority."
May 13: Australian researchers report that "SARS-CoV-2 is uniquely adapted to infect humans, raising important questions as to whether it arose in nature by a rare chance event or whether its origins might lie elsewhere."
May 14: Microsoft announces that it is acquiring UK-based Metaswitch Networks "to expand its Azure 5G strategy."
May 15: The House passes the 1,815-page, $3 trillion HEROES Act ("Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency Solutions Act"), sneaking in portions of the TRACE ACT that would funnel $75 billion to the CDC for "coronavirus testing, contact tracing and isolation measures."
May 18: Moderna announces interim results from the Phase 1 trial of its mRNA-1273 coronavirus vaccine. The company reports that three out of 15 healthy participants (20%) experienced Grade 3 systemic adverse events following a second dose. (The Merck Manual defines Grade 3 as "severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care.")
May 18: Discussing the interim results from Moderna's Phase 1 trial of its mRNA-1273 vaccine--co-developed with NIAID--Dr. Fauci states: "I must warn that there's also the possibility of negative consequences, where certain vaccines can actually enhance the negative effect of the infection."
May 18: After describing its interim Phase 1 results as "promising," shares of Moderna stock soar 25%, closing at a "record high." The company's stock has gained 241% since the beginning of 2020.
May 20: Microsoft announces its new supercomputer intended to create "human-like" artificial intelligence.
#COVID #COVIDTruth #China #WHO #WEF #BillGates #AnthonyFauci #FrancisCollins #RalphBaric #Vaccines #Genocide #Eugenics
COVID-19 Timeline of Events: Please feel free to add to this timeline by adding it through the comments. If it's good information, I will certainly add it to the main post above. Thanks for your help.
Like -
2020-12-22T11:33:44-09:00
From the moment of "COVID-19's" naming--and particularly since the imposition of unprecedented restrictions on life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness that we've seen since March 13, 2020--some people have smelled a rat. And with each passing week, the smell just gets worse.
A growing chorus of ordinary citizens and world-renowned medical and scientific experts is raising questions about matters ranging from the real origins of SARS-Cov-2 (Wuhan Institute of Virology with U.S. taxpayer funding) to the rationale for continued lock-downs and the seemingly never-ending list of Draconian measures that are being imposed on every society except China, which is where the virus came from, and Sweden, which did none of these unnecessary things, and which has now effectively achieved "herd immunity," despite what the nattering Communist nabobs at the WHO warned and predicted would happen if they did not lock-down like every one else did.
The mainstream propaganda media have shown themselves only too ready to lob ad hominem attacks against anyone not marching in lockstep with this giant, worldwide PSYOP and Globalist takeover operation that's been cleverly disguised as a grave viral pandemic.
However, one does not have to be insensitive to the illness and deaths which are TRULY associated with COVID-19, and you see that there actually very few when you scratch the paint away from the CDC's fraudulent IFR statistics, to recognize that powerful agendas are riding on the coattails of SARS-CoV-2.
Millions of Americans are waking up to the fact that the countries, officials and public figures who embrace Draconian interventions such as immunity certificates, microchipping, forced injection with a genetic mutagen disguised as a vaccine, and the removal of children from their homes also approve of making our sovereign rights--whether to earn a living, maintain bodily autonomy, congregate to practice our spirituality, or protect and educate our children--contingent upon our acceptance of these Draconian measures.
While the lock-down is a cataclysm for the world economy, and a boom for China's, it' also a huge opportunity for Bill Gates" and the Thirteen Families of eugenicists who he represents.
Around the world, many people are understandably reeling in shock at the rapid economic, social and cultural changes that have followed in the wake of the phenomenon called "COVID-19." Many of these changes involve ever-tighter restrictions on our rights and freedoms, accompanied by inexorable messaging--both public and subliminal--that a "vaccine for all" and 24/7 tracking and surveillance are the only way out.
Increasingly, however, there are hopeful signs that more members of the public are recognizing the duplicity and self-interest of those offering false salvation. Each of us needs to do our part to expose these issues, standing up for individual sovereignty and working to halt the transition to a totalitarian singularity more despotic than anything that George Orwell could have ever imagined.
My COVID-19 Timeline of Events page, which I have linked to below is intended to make it easier for the everyone to assess what is happening and what is at stake. You're invited to visit this page, and consider how these events--some of them seemingly unrelated--and the network of partnerships and relationships that they illustrate have contributed to the unfolding set of circumstances in which we now find ourselves.
https://freedommovement.info/social/page/covid19timeline
#BillGates #Elites #Oligarchs #Vaccines #Eugenics #Genocide #Medicine #COVID19 #COVIDTruth #WHO #Science #Government
A growing chorus of ordinary citizens and world-renowned medical and scientific experts is raising questions about matters ranging from the real origins of SARS-Cov-2 (Wuhan Institute of Virology with U.S. taxpayer funding) to the rationale for continued lock-downs and the seemingly never-ending list of Draconian measures that are being imposed on every society except China, which is where the virus came from, and Sweden, which did none of these unnecessary things, and which has now effectively achieved "herd immunity," despite what the nattering Communist nabobs at the WHO warned and predicted would happen if they did not lock-down like every one else did.
The mainstream propaganda media have shown themselves only too ready to lob ad hominem attacks against anyone not marching in lockstep with this giant, worldwide PSYOP and Globalist takeover operation that's been cleverly disguised as a grave viral pandemic.
However, one does not have to be insensitive to the illness and deaths which are TRULY associated with COVID-19, and you see that there actually very few when you scratch the paint away from the CDC's fraudulent IFR statistics, to recognize that powerful agendas are riding on the coattails of SARS-CoV-2.
Millions of Americans are waking up to the fact that the countries, officials and public figures who embrace Draconian interventions such as immunity certificates, microchipping, forced injection with a genetic mutagen disguised as a vaccine, and the removal of children from their homes also approve of making our sovereign rights--whether to earn a living, maintain bodily autonomy, congregate to practice our spirituality, or protect and educate our children--contingent upon our acceptance of these Draconian measures.
While the lock-down is a cataclysm for the world economy, and a boom for China's, it' also a huge opportunity for Bill Gates" and the Thirteen Families of eugenicists who he represents.
Around the world, many people are understandably reeling in shock at the rapid economic, social and cultural changes that have followed in the wake of the phenomenon called "COVID-19." Many of these changes involve ever-tighter restrictions on our rights and freedoms, accompanied by inexorable messaging--both public and subliminal--that a "vaccine for all" and 24/7 tracking and surveillance are the only way out.
Increasingly, however, there are hopeful signs that more members of the public are recognizing the duplicity and self-interest of those offering false salvation. Each of us needs to do our part to expose these issues, standing up for individual sovereignty and working to halt the transition to a totalitarian singularity more despotic than anything that George Orwell could have ever imagined.
My COVID-19 Timeline of Events page, which I have linked to below is intended to make it easier for the everyone to assess what is happening and what is at stake. You're invited to visit this page, and consider how these events--some of them seemingly unrelated--and the network of partnerships and relationships that they illustrate have contributed to the unfolding set of circumstances in which we now find ourselves.
https://freedommovement.info/social/page/covid19timeline
#BillGates #Elites #Oligarchs #Vaccines #Eugenics #Genocide #Medicine #COVID19 #COVIDTruth #WHO #Science #Government